Washington Utility Stops Accepting Applications for Crypto Mining
A customer-owned utilities company in rural Washington has stopped accepting applications for electricity from and similar operations, the Seattle Times July 30.
The Franklin Public Utility District commissioners (PUD) have approved a moratorium that will allow time for staff to investigate the impact of cryptocurrency mining on the electrical system before accepting applications. The PUD staff will also consider a new rate structure.
While initially drawn to rural Washington and New York by cheap electricity, miners are increasingly falling under the scrutiny of local regulators and power utilities, who are concerned about long term power supply for residents and other businesses.
In April, another rural Washington public utility, Chelan PUD, staff to enforce a moratorium on crypto mining with the discovery of unauthorized mining activities, becoming concerned with the state and safety of electricity systems. The enforcement measures included fines and penalties, disconnecting service, “reporting unauthorized loads to law enforcement as power theft”, and “firing officials to protect public safety.”
Earlier this month, New York state regulators a new rate scheme for miners that will allow them to negotiate contracts. The decision gives 36 municipal power authorities permission to charge crypto miners more than other consumers. The Massena municipal utility will consider contracts and set prices on a case-by-case basis for crypto miners who are interested in conducting operations there, which reportedly will protect other utility customers from increased rates.
Some local authorities have been more welcoming of crypto mining operations. In April, Port of Walla Walla, Washington commissioners unanimously on a land lease and purchase option for 10 acres to be used for a cryptocurrency mining project by subsidiary Ant Creek LLC. While the main concern of opponents to the project is the massive amount of that the company will consume, the project meets the Port’s mission of job and tax base creation.
Digital currency practices have exploded in recent months, bringing to the forefront new regulations. This means VC investors looking to get a piece of the action need to do further due-diligence and remain informed on the legal side.
According to , last year two bitcoin and blockchain-related startups raised over $1 billion in total investment. This is a massive increase from the $347 million invested in the space in 2014.
So what are the latest issues around cryptocurrencies? How will the recent SEC announcement impact investors? Bob Graham, partner and head of the digital currency services practice at , has been receiving inquiries from both bitcoin and blockchain-related firms and investor funds asking for audits and advice.
Graham tells bitcoin Magazine in an exclusive interview what VC investors should be aware of and how Bitfinex recently engaged Friedman to assist with an audit.
What issues are VCs facing related to digital currency?
There are several issues that VCs are facing when making investment decisions. Comparability of financial information between companies and industry trends are important factors that many investors use. There are a lot of startups in the digital currency industry, but some entities are becoming more mature and sophisticated, which brings more sophisticated investors.
Which accounting rules apply?
Currently under U.S. GAAP [generally accepted accounting procedure] rules, there are no specific accounting principles to address digital currencies, and therefore companies must interpret existing standards to determine which standard best applies by analogy to the transactions they are accounting for. This can result in divergence in practice and incomparability of financial information for investors looking to make an investment decision.
Another issue that many investors are facing is the lack of regulation and clarity. On the regulatory side this week we saw the SEC announce it would regulate the DAO. What is your view?
The SEC released their “Report of Investigation Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: The DAO,” which provided some clarification, in that the Commission determined that DAO Tokens are securities under the Securities Act of 1933. I have discussed this conclusion with members of the digital currency community, and the general consensus was that it was anticipated that the SEC would include tokens as considered securities under the Securities Act of 1933.
The SEC concluded that whether or not a particular transaction involves the offer and sale of a security will depend on the facts and circumstances, including the economic realities of the transaction. This is important, as the SEC is evaluating tokens on a case-by-case basis using the fact pattern outlined in the Report of Investigation into the DAO.
They provided some key considerations that companies and their consultants can evaluate in determining if tokens being offered would be considered a security under Securities Act of 1933.
There has been a significant influx of capital into digital currency companies during 2017 through token offerings, which vary significantly in structure. Some of the members of the community fear that regulation may slow innovation, but there is a delicate balance [between] innovation and investor protection. Some more sophisticated investors, including VCs, have been hesitant to enter the token-offering environment due to the lack of regulation.
We hear the phrase “Wild West” quite a lot when people refer to the cryptocurrency world. Could you expand on why you think a “Wild West” type scenario is being created?
One could say that the lack of regulation, relatively short timeframes and significant amount of capital being raised through token offerings could create a “Wild West” scenario when compared to a traditional route of an initial public offering. Companies looking to perform a token offering have to evaluate the structure of their offering and utilize lawyers and accounting firms that have experience in this industry in order to ensure they are appropriately protecting the investors, employees of the companies and the company itself.
With the SEC report discussed above, the SEC has put companies in this industry on notice that they are expected to follow the registration process with the Commission and take appropriate steps to comply with U.S. federal securities laws unless they are subject to exemption. It will be interesting to see how quickly the SEC proceeds in evaluating other token offerings that have been completed and any future token offerings; but they will be a key part of bringing regulation to the industry, which will hopefully improve investor confidence and allow digital currencies to become more mainstream investment vehicles.
Can you tell us more about the theft and compromised-exchanges issue facing the space? How could those types of issues have been avoided? Will the environment become safer?
I think that the environment will become safer as the digital currency markets continue to mature … The U.S. Department of Justice unsealed an indictment imposing a $110 million fine on the bitcoin exchange BTC-e for violating anti-money laundering laws. This is important as BTC-e is not domiciled in the U.S., and shows that U.S. regulators are willing to pursue action across borders. There is also an ongoing IRS investigation of the digital currency exchange Coinbase, which is domiciled in San Francisco, regarding tax reporting for digital currency transactions and customer records.
As exchanges continue to mature and subject themselves to additional checks and balances, whether through an audit of the financial information or an audit of their internal controls and processes, they will continue to develop better systems and processes which will hopefully promote a safer environment. These exchanges will continue to be the targets of theft due to the considerable value of their customer accounts and the digital nature of the transactions, but with continued development and more defined and tested processes the potential for loss will hopefully be reduced.
Keep in mind that no matter how sound an environment there is, there will always be a possibility of theft or other targeted attacks, but that isn’t something unique to the digital currency industry as it occurs often in other industries as well.
What role has Friedman LLP played in helping Bitfinex following the recent theft of more than $65 million worth of bitcoins from its exchange?
Unfortunately, I can’t go into a lot of detail about client accounts outside of what is public knowledge regarding the press release. I can say that as far as we are aware, there [are] many exchanges that are currently audited and I think it is great that Bitfinex is taking the time and effort to engage an auditor and open their books and records to external examination in order to encourage investor and customer confidence.
DS PLUS (PlusCoin) – Working days DS PLUS (PlusCoin) – is a decentralized platform for organization of loyalty systems for businesses and cashback service for users. The feature of the platform is in its technological […]
bitcoin [BTC]’s mining death spiral explained by BlockTower’s CIO, Ari Paul Ari Paul, the managing partner, and Chief Investment Officer the BlockTower capital spoke recently on TD Ameritrade’s Morning Trade Live on Monday and discussed bitcoin’s declining hash […]
