June 22, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Crypto World ’Definitely in a Bubble’: Wikipedia Creator Jimmy Wales

Crypto world ’definitely in a bubble’: wikipedia creator jimmy wales

Crypto World ’Definitely in a Bubble’: Wikipedia Creator Jimmy Wales


Wikipedia
Advertisement

Get exclusive analysis and cryptocurrency insights on Hacked.com for just $39 per month.

The co-founder of the world’s largest online encyclopedia said that he believes the current state of the cryptocurrency market bears many of the characteristics of an asset bubble.

Wikipedia creator Jimmy Wales made this claim on Tuesday at cryptocurrency conference Blockshow, which is being hosted in Berlin.

“Right now, we are in a bubble. The crypto world is absolutely, definitely in a bubble. I don’t think there’s many people who would deny that,” he said, adding that the space needs some “real journalism.”

As CCN reported, the Wikimedia Foundation has been accepting bitcoin donations since 2014, shortly after Wales revealed that he was “playing with BTC.” Four years later, the organization still accepts bitcoin donations, though it has not added support for any other cryptocurrencies.

Notably, despite Wikipedia’s early support for bitcoin, Wales not been as kind to the emergence of initial coin offerings (ICOs) as a method to decentralize early stage funding.

“I think blockchain is a super interesting technology but there are a lot of fads going on right now,” he told CNBC last October. “There are a lot of these initial coin offerings which are in my opinion are absolute scams and people should be very wary of things that are going on in that area.”

The cryptocurrency market ballooned over the ensuing four months, only to crash back down toward earth during the first two quarters of 2018. Nevertheless, Wales has reitered his stance on ICOs even after the market correction.

Earlier this month, he said in an interview with VentureBeat that the ICO industry is analogous to the dot-com bubble that occurred at the turn of the millennium.

“Almost every ICO is offering nothing of value to the world. That doesn’t mean that the concept of an ICO is inherently bad — just that we are in a bubble where people are doing a lot of things that don’t make any rational sense outside of the bubble mentality,” he said. “We’ve lived through this before during the dot-com bubble.”

Featured Image from Shutterstock

Follow us on Telegram.
Advertisement

Published at Tue, 29 May 2018 20:08:58 +0000

bitcoin Opinion

Previous Article

Please Stop I don't Care About Your ShitCoins T-shirt | Crypto Shirt | Bitcoin | Ethereum | Cryptocurrency | Gift Idea

Next Article

Enigma – Principles Of Lust: Sadeness / Find Love / Sadeness (Reprise)

You might be interested in …

Blockchain-enabled Prediction & Transactions

Blockchain-enabled Prediction & Transactions Fintech Camp Bucharest is waiting for you at final meetup of 2018, on Thursday, Dec 6, where we will have two presentations on blockchain applied to the financial market, namely transactions […]

U.S. Senate Mulls Reporting Requirements for Cryptocurrencies

USSenateBill

American bitcoin holders may soon have to report their holding to the United States government.

First introduced on May 25, 2015, by Sen. Chuck Grassley [R-IA], Senate Bill S.1241, the
“Combating Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing, and Counterfeiting Act of 2017,” can have serious implications for those involved in the cryptocurrency space. The hearing for S.1241 was held with virtually no public notice on November 28, 2017; the full two-hour hearing can be viewed here.

Currently, the definition of “financial institution” includes banks, trust companies, credit unions, currency exchanges and the like. But according to Section 5312(a) of title 31, the new bill would amend the definition of “financial institution” to include “an issuer, redeemer, or cashier of prepaid access devices, digital currency, or any digital exchanger or tumbler of digital currency.” 

This is most specifically embedded in Section 13:

senatebilltextscreen.png

Sen. Dianne Feinstein [D-CA] said in her opening remarks of the hearing, “The bill criminalizes intentionally concealing ownership or control of a bank account.” Although, during the hearing, no further clarifications were given as to the effects this would have on the cryptocurrency community, based on the amended definition of “financial institution,” it would seem that the bill would criminalize anyone intentionally concealing ownership or control of a digital currency or exchange account. While there is no finalized bill yet, the implication would be that cryptocurrency holders need to fill in federal registration forms for tax disclosure, quarterly reporting and more.

Notably, while the purpose of the bill and hearing had to do with adding digital currencies and exchanges to the definition of financial institutions, there was almost no discussion on the topic other than briefly in reference to drug cartels using them to launder money. For example, nowhere in the testimony by Coinbase board of directors member Kathryn Haun Rodriguez does she mention digital currencies or exchanges, and at no time was she asked any questions about them.

Unsurprisingly, the bill is receiving pushback from some cryptocurrency holders. Activists on Reddit have started a social media campaign in opposition to the bill, and are suggesting others to tweet: “@senjudiciary that #Bitcoiners are not #Crooks Remove #DigitalCurrencies from Section 13 of S1241.” Others are contacting their senators directly.

The post U.S. Senate Mulls Reporting Requirements for Cryptocurrencies appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.