July 1, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Chinese Authorities Publish List of Registered Blockchain Firms

Chinese Authorities Publish List of Registered Blockchain Firms

On March 30, 2019, the National Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) issued registration numbers to nearly 200 distributed ledger technology (DLT)-based firms in the region as part of its broader plan of regulating, securing, strengthening, and advancing the growth of the industry, according to local news source Yicai.

Chinese DLT Firms Get Licensed

Based on the publication, the CAC has issued registration numbers to the first set of 197 blockchain-based service providers in China who have officially registered.

These are companies who made filings to be registered and have been approved to render services in the region. They include Baidu, a technology company, Tencent, an investment holding company, and Iqiyi, an online video platform.

Before their approval, the CAC reportedly reviewed their applications in a manner that conforms with the laws and regulations presented on February 15, 2019, by the Management Rules on Blockchain Information Service.

CY Cheung, a partner of PwC Shanghai, told Yicai that the CAC’s filling regulation is in line with its fundamental principle of strengthening, securing, and developing the country’s financial industry.

Cheung further said the national policy was revealed last year and as such, news about the successful filing of these applications was only recently published which also calls for those who have not registered to do so.

Stakeholders’ Comments

Some blockchain-based service providers in the region who made comments include Sunny Lu, CEO of the VeChain (VET) project and Feng Xiao, President and CEO of Wanxiang Blockchain.

According to Xiao, the commercial benefits companies stand to reap through the development of blockchain-based applications has been an incentive to create them; however, there will be no developments in blockchain if applications were not built on the DLT.

Even if these applications are developed, there will be no one to use them without first complying and registering in the region.

According to Yicai, earlier in March, Hongliang Mao, an engineer from CNC, pointed out that all firms that use DLT in their operations in one way or the other must make efforts to submit their applications.

If they make use of the Internet, applications, and other tools which employ public, consortium or private blockchains to provide their customers’ with highly functional services, then they must come under the CAC umbrella.

On the other hand, the official also made it clear that blockchain-focused media firms are not required to apply for a license since they do not use DLT to render their services.

While the Chinese blockchain space continues flourishing, its harsh stance towards bitcoin and other cryptos has taken its toll on some firms in the cryptospace.

As BTCManager reported on January 30, 2019, Nvidia, a firm that manufactures GPUs for cryptocurrency mining, blamed the decline in its Q4 2018 revenue on China’s draconian crypto regulations among other factors.

Like BTCMANAGER? Send us a tip!
Our bitcoin Address: 3AbQrAyRsdM5NX5BQh8qWYePEpGjCYLCy4

Published at Tue, 02 Apr 2019 06:10:44 +0000

Previous Article

Viermonatshoch: Bitcoin knackt 5.000 US-Dollar

Next Article

Samsung Galaxy S10 is out but its cryptocurrency wallet is AWOL

You might be interested in …

Adam Back to Jihan Wu: SegWit Not ‘Complicated,’ Fixes Satoshi’s Bug

Hashcash inventor Adam Back has said Segregated Witness (SegWit) “fixes” an original bug in bitcoin from creator Satoshi Nakamoto.


Back: SegWit ‘Fixes Satoshi Bug’

As part of a Twitter exchange Friday, Back rebuffed criticism from bitcoin Unlimited proponent Jihan Wu, demonstrating how SegWit is beneficial to the virtual currency’s core protocol.

Wu, who is a co-founder of mining conglomerate Bitmain, had said that the technology would make the network “more complicated.”

adam-back

“SegWit is not more complicated,” Back wrote.

“It fixes Satoshi’s bug that txid=H(tx,sig) to txid=H(tx) this is not complicated, and it is necessary to fix.”

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

What’s more, if implemented, SegWit can can actually help reduce the so-called “technical debt” burden of complicated code albeit having its own tradeoffs, which are assessed here.

The segwit code has been heavily reviewed, which helps resist the introduction of technical debt at both a code and design level…Segwit has multiple independent reimplementations, which helps discover any unnecessary complexity and technical debt at the point that it can still be avoided.

SegWit: Complicated & Straightforward

Wu’s stance echoes a broader opinion from the Chinese community in particular that SegWit creates unnecessary complexity within bitcoin.

In an interview with Bitcoinist this month, for example, Leon Liu, CEO of P2P trading service Bitkan, said that this was a reason why the technology “is not the best solution for bitcoin scaling.”

“Segwit will not be the best solution for bitcoin scaling, it will make the bitcoin network more complicated,” he stated.

At the same time, efforts have been made to allay such fears, Blocktrail CTO Ruben De Vries commenting last year that SegWit “is not very complicated if you already know the ins and outs of the bitcoin protocol.”

segregated-witness

Back meanwhile has praised attempts at educating the wider community on the nature of scaling solutions without resorting to ‘political’ siding.

An explainer on SegWit by Andreas Antonopoulos garnered considerable praise, Back describing it as “the best he’d seen on the topic.”

On its benefits, Antonopoulos wrote in the blog post, which originally came out in August last year:

“Firstly, segregated witness reduces the overall cost of transactions by discounting witness data and increasing the capacity of the bitcoin blockchain.

“Secondly, segregated witness’ discount on witness data corrects a misalignment of incentives that may have inadvertently created more bloat in the UTXO set.”

Litecoin Bounce on SegWit Rumors?

SegWit is traditionally considered ‘complicated’ compared to merely increasing the bitcoin block size, despite the latter requiring a hard fork of the virtual currency.

Currently, the proposal is still behind bitcoin Unlimited though both need at least 95% to activate.

12121212

Outside the bitcoin debate, rumors surfacing that Litecoin is to activate SegWit may have led to a surprise expansion in value of the altcoin by around 30%.

What do you think about the contrasting opinions on SegWit? Will it add complexity to bitcoin? Let us know in the comments below!


Images courtesy of Shutterstock, Twitter

The post Adam Back to Jihan Wu: SegWit Not ‘Complicated,’ Fixes Satoshi’s Bug appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.