July 19, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Wall Street Marketplace Shutdown Sees $14.2 Million Stolen

Wall street marketplace shutdown sees $14. 2 million stolen

Wall Street Marketplace Shutdown Sees $14.2 Million Stolen

Wall street marketplace shutdown sees $14. 2 million stolen

Following the shutdown of another prominent dark web marketplace, the Wall Street Market has also shut down, with $14.2 million in customer funds lost, as reported on April 23, 2019.

The Great Shutdown

One of the biggest ongoing tasks for the crypto community is the shedding of its image as being a hub for criminals.

One of the ways by which this belief is perpetuated is through the dark web, especially when it came to light that the amount of bitcoin being spent on the dark web doubled in 2018.

Despite their popularity, authorities are working hard to crack down on such marketplaces. Just a month after one of the oldest and most powerful dark web markets was shut down, another dark web market has also been shut down as reported on April 23, 2019.

The Wall Street Market is shutting down after an exit scam in which $14.2 million in user funds were stolen.

The funds in question belong to various criminals selling illegal items over the Internet. Following the closure of the Wall Street Market, the T.chka market is now the only major marketplace on the dark web.

Prior to the reportedly long-winded scheme, the Wall Street bitcoin wallet worked as an escrow system whereby users would deposit funds to be held while awaiting their goods and services from sellers.

However, it was reported that last week the admins of the marketplace had encountered some difficulties with the service providers of the wallet. Ultimately, customers couldn’t make withdrawals on the platform. 

This drew complaints and criticisms from customers but so far, it appears the money is gone and management will not be returning it to any of them. Warnings have since been circulating on the Internet cautioning users from conducting any business with the Wall Street Market. On top of this, marketplace users are being blackmailed by the support staff of the market to pay them or have their information leaked to the public and law enforcement.

Like BTCMANAGER? Send us a tip!
Our bitcoin Address: 3AbQrAyRsdM5NX5BQh8qWYePEpGjCYLCy4

Published at Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:13:55 +0000

Previous Article

Blockchain Platform for Content Creators and Fans Sets Out Plan for Gaining Global Reach

Next Article

Millionaire Teenage Rapper Lil Pump is Selling Merchandise for Bitcoin

You might be interested in …

Alex Tapscott’s Nextblock Global Receives Major Backlash Prior to Public Offering

Things have gone from bad to worse for Alex Tapscott this past week. Several of his projects have received a lot of scrutiny. Moreover, there are some allegations which have to be rectified as well. Nextblock Global, the company owned by Alex Tapscott, will invest in companies and projects focusing on ICOs. However, the list of advisors for this company is mostly fake. Not a big surprise, but it is still rather worrisome.

Most people in the cryptocurrency world know the name Alex Tapscott. He is a well-known author and Canadian investors. However, his latest business venture raises a lot more questions than answers. Nextblock Global is a very dubious business model, to say the least. Not because of the investing angle, but everything else about it seems pretty fake. Especially the list of alleged advisors contains names which aren’t even associated with this venture.

Trouble Ahead for Nextblock Global

Some of those names include Andreas Antonopoulos and Dmitry Buterin. It is unclear why their names are on the list of advisors, to begin with. Neither of these gentlemen is even remotely connected to this new venture. There are some other names on the page which may also be completely fake, including Vinny Lingham and Kathryn Haun. It is disconcerting to see these names listed on a site they don’t even want to be associated with. It is a common tactic among semi-scammy ICO ventures, though.

The big question is why Alex Tapscott made such a grave mistake. It is evident these names were included to make the company more legitimate. However, it is unclear if this is his doing or someone else’s. The official explanation is how they were “listed in a draft version”. Even so, these names shouldn’t be there unless they agree to be a part of it. A weak explanation, to say the very least. This doesn’t bode well for the future of Nextblock Global either.

It is evident this whole ordeal will cause a lot of heated debate. The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce has rebuked its underwriting of the Nextblock Global public offering. This is the only logical decision as long as these “issues” are still being discussed. It is a very strange and potentially unfortunate turn of events. Whether or not there was any foul play involved, will always remain a question. It won’t do the reputation of Alex Tapscott any favors either right now. Then again, if this is an error, it should all blow over pretty soon.

Header image courtesy of Shutterstock

The post Alex Tapscott’s Nextblock Global Receives Major Backlash Prior to Public Offering appeared first on NEWSBTC.

Intro to Blockchain and Smart Contracts

Intro to Blockchain and Smart Contracts In this course you will learn about the Blockchain and how to build Ethereum decentralized applications. The power of Blockchain apps is no central authority and verified transactions among untrusted parties. […]