January 25, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

The Economics of Coffee Culture – The Merkle Hash

The Economics of Coffee Culture – The Merkle Hash

In the United States 69% of adults drink at least two cups of coffee a day.  Humanity’s experience with coffee doesn’t begin and end with our morning thermos though – where there is culture, coffee culture isn’t far behind.

Heavily influencing European cultures, the Dutch Parisians, and Venetians in particular, the first coffeehouses as we understand them today began cropping up in the Netherlands. Offering more than just a place to sit and enjoy a hot cup of coffee, the coffeehouse offered a neutral location for socializing, discussion, innovation, and even dissent. Sociologist Ray Oldenburg describes the concept of the “third place” as a meeting place other than the home or workplace that remains accessible to all, regardless of status.

Third place locations often include other familiar settings like bars and public parks, even barber shops take on this role in some communities. What we get from the third place is a setting that’s focused on building and maintaining community, conversations, and important interactions. In 1792, the Tontine Coffee House in New York City served as the birthplace for the New York Stock Exchange; decades later and hundreds of miles away, the all-American cocktail the Sazerac was named for its coffee shop home, the Sazerac Coffee House in New Orleans.

In pop culture, we see the reflection on our need for a third place. Up until the early/mid-1990s, the third place of media choice was a bar; sitcom favorites like Cheers took place almost entirely within a bar. But as times changes, and coffee obsession began to take on a local mood, our favorite characters started spending their time at coffee shops instead.

Seinfeld and even Cheers spinoff series Frasier all had essential plot setting in their community coffeehouse. “Central Perk,” the coffee shop and favorite hangout spot from the massively popular TV sitcom Friends became so memorable to fans that Warner Bros had trademarked the rights to the name, logo, and facade signage and maintains these rights even 15 years after Friends had finished its run on TV. In 2014, WB hosted a temporary pop-up recreation of the Central Perk café, catering coffee to fans.

Looking back on our history with coffee can not only help us predict the trends of the future, but also offers us interesting and even relatable insights into the past. When we see coffee’s place in the movement of the world from global trade, political unrest, social defiance, and community building. Coffee is full of contradictions – and yet we still enjoy it every morning. Take a look at this infographic for more on a deeper look into coffee culture and how we can use it to look towards the future, espresso in hand.

Source: RaveReviews.org

Image(s): Photo by rawpixel.com from Pexels.com

Published at Tue, 05 Feb 2019 22:56:56 +0000

Previous Article

Crypto-Anarchist Shot Dead in Mexico’s Murder Capital Ahead of Anarchapulco

Next Article

Stellar Price Remains Bearish as Value Drops Below $0.08

You might be interested in …

“大区块”运动正转向延展区块,BU和Core之争最终为他人做嫁衣?

“大区块”运动正转向延展区块,BU和Core之争最终为他人做嫁衣? 在长达两年的比特币扩容争论进程中,很少有替代性选择能够发展到足以挑战比特币网络最著名的且运行时间最长的软件——bitcoin Core。其中相对比较有名的方案就是bitcoin XT和bitcoin Classic,这两种替代性选择都优先支持更大区块大小作为扩展比特币交易能力的方法。 然而,这些雄心勃勃的方案的副作用就是网络用户需要切换比特币实施来执行这些更改,但并不是所有人都想或愿意这样做。 这些都暴露了扩容争论中出现的一种潜规则——替代性解决方案不仅需要提出一种技术更改,还要组建自己的开发者团队,这样才能作为一种资本来提出不同观点。 最近很有名的替代性解决方案就是bitcoin Unlimited,该方案允许矿工和用户支持他们自己想要的区块大小,然而BU遭受了一些质疑,其中之一就是其代码糟糕——或者说,至少还不成熟。例如,今年3月份,攻击者两次利用这些bug,导致大多数的BU网络节点关闭。 在这种情况下,一种叫做“Bcoin”的实施(由比特币创业公司Purse创建)加入了这场扩容争论,这种方案可能会成为扩容争论中一项引人注目的成果。 Purse在这种方案中引入了旧的扩容思想——“延展区块(e-block)”,并以此作为一种绕过如今的区块大小停滞的方法。该方案在本周公布之后就获得了很多人的吹捧。 经过复杂的技术讨论之后,这种想法被认为具有争议性,一些开发者认为添加“延展区块”是不安全的。 不过,延展区块仍旧获得了强烈的支持,很大程度上是由于其开发团队的技术能力。值得注意的是,一些BU支持者已经对这个项目表达了赞美之词。 例如,ViaBTC矿池首席执行官杨海坡告诉Coindesk说他支持Purse的概念和Bcoin团队。 杨说: “我认为延展区块将会是向前发展的解决方案。”  “有希望的”选项  总的来说,越来越多的人认为Bcoin(一种于去年9月份推出的替代性Node.js实施)拥有比BU以及其他所谓的“大区块”团队更加强大的技术团队。 例如,Purse CTO和Bcoin开发者克里斯托弗-杰弗里(Christopher Jeffrey)就因为构建了该软件以及一种正在进行中的闪电网络实施——Plasma(这种实施能够部署到该软件之上)而受到了称赞。 同时,闪电网络联合作者约瑟夫-潘(Joseph Poon)还帮助编写了Bcoin实施最近引入的旗舰技术的参数。 支持者认为该团队的技术实力能够被信赖的原因之一就是,在3月份,BTC.com矿池已经通过运行Bcoin软件挖出了一个区块——这是第一个不是基于比特币源代码实施的区块。 Purse已经发布了一份技术草案和参考实施代码,用于在Bcoin上实施延展区块。 这并不是说Bcoin与其他实施一样想要取代bitcoin Core。当Bcoin第一次被公布时,Purse将其描述为一种代码更加清洁的比特币替代性选择,并且能够与其他软件版本共存。 分歧仍然存在  尽管杨海坡对延展区块很有信心,不过,并非所有BU支持者都是如此。 例如,比特币基金会前董事会成员Olivier Janssens批评这种解决方案太复杂,告诉Coindesk说Bcoin想法“太复杂了”。 他说: “人们需要克服自己对硬分叉的恐惧。”然而,很多人都正在谈论这种方案的积极面,即使他们可能更加专注于其他扩容选项。 bitcoin Core替代选择最直言不讳的倡导者,比特币投资者和bitcoin.com运营者Roger […]