October 9, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

The Daily: Shatner Dives Deep Into Crypto, Bank to Launch Digital Deposit Box

bitcoin News
The Daily: Shatner Dives Deep Into Crypto, Bank to Launch Digital Deposit Box
The daily: shatner dives deep into crypto, bank to launch digital deposit box

In today’s edition of The Daily, we feature a story about William Shatner flaunting his vast crypto knowledge, from Tether to Kitties. Additionally covered are a bank which wants to offer a digital deposit box for exchanges and investment funds, a new development in the Charlie Shrem lawsuit and more.

Also Read: Marshall Islands President Attacked Over National Crypto Plan

Tether Blows Captain Kirk’s Mind

William Shatner, the original Captain Kirk, wants you to know that he knows his crypto. After admitting back in June that he doesn’t fully understand the bitcoin mining business he was getting into, Shatner has now gone on a tweet storm showing just how much he learned.

Besides discussing developments in smart contracts, Shatner also dropped a truth bomb on Tether (USDT). He wrote: “I know how smart contracts work. That’s really not hard. What’s more mind bending is Tether being (supposedly) linked to the dollar but being worth less than a dollar…”

Obviously having a lot of fun with this dive into the world of cryptocurrency, the TV star was also happy to engage with fans about Crypto Kitties. And after learning that he can breed them, Shatner joked that he is now waiting for the accessories, “the Crypto Kitty Dream House and the Crypto Kitty Corvette.”

The daily: shatner dives deep into crypto, bank to launch digital deposit box

Canadian Bank to Launch Deposit Box for Exchanges

The daily: shatner dives deep into crypto, bank to launch digital deposit boxVersa Bank (previously Pacific & Western Bank of Canada) is a Canadian chartered bank publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange. It announced on Thursday it has completed beta testing for its “digital safety deposit box” and is now starting to offer the new service to cryptocurrency exchanges and crypto-based investment funds. The company states it does not have the ability to ‘drill’ into a client’s deposit box, or to examine its contents.

President and CEO David Taylor stated: “While many are considering ideas and plans for a digital safety deposit box, we have designed and built it, and are now commercializing a first of its kind service that provides our clients with the most sophisticated security and authentication technology available globally, in which our clients enjoy absolute privacy. The Versa Vault will now begin rolling out services to cryptocurrency exchanges and crypto investment funds.”

Court Unfreezes Charlie Shrem’s Accounts

Earlier this month, it was reported that a U.S. federal court has ordered the freezing of Charlie Shrem’s accounts on Coinbase and Xapo. This was done after he was hit by a lawsuit alleging that the early bitcoin pioneer had stolen about 5,000 BTC from the founders of the Gemini exchange. But in what might be an indication of the merits of the allegations, the court has reversed the asset freezing order in a hearing on Thursday. Now Shrem can go back to his luxury shopping spree, and maybe get a third Maserati.

Cryptopay Mail Bomber

The daily: shatner dives deep into crypto, bank to launch digital deposit boxLondon’s Metropolitan Police has revealed on Friday that a 43-year-old Swedish man was sentenced to six and a half years in jail for mailing a homemade bomb to a “bitcoin company.” The Stockholm District Court found Jermu Michael Salonen guilty of attempted murder for sending a bomb to Cryptopay – a UK based crypto wallet and payment solution.

According to the Met Police, the motive for Salonen’s actions is that he was locked out of his account, unable to access his funds after losing his password. In August 2017 he asked Cryptopay to reset his password and send him a new one but the company refused as this contravened their privacy policy.

Commander Clarke Jarrett, head of the Met Police Counter Terrorism Command, said: “Salonen seemingly made and sent a device that had the capability to seriously harm and even kill over something as inconsequential as a change of password. Fortunately the bomb did not detonate. It was due to sheer luck that the recipient ripped opened the package in the middle rather than using the envelope flap which would have activated the device.”

What do you think about today’s news tidbits? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock.

Verify and track bitcoin cash transactions on our BCH Block Explorer, the best of its kind anywhere in the world. Also, keep up with your holdings, BCH and other coins, on our market charts at Satoshi’s Pulse, another original and free service from bitcoin.com.

The post The Daily: Shatner Dives Deep Into Crypto, Bank to Launch Digital Deposit Box appeared first on Bitcoin News.

CoinSpeaker
A Low Interest from Institutional Investors Impedes Wall Street Crypto March

CoinSpeaker
A Low Interest from Institutional Investors Impedes Wall Street Crypto March

Well, in the last few months, there were several stories of an increase in institutional penetration in the crypto market. Last month in early October, a Bloomberg report cited Bobby Cho, global head of trading at Cumberland, affirming to this. Cho told Bloomberg that bigger hedge funds are now replacing high-net individuals in the crypto market.

Much recently, Morgan Stanley’s research arm presented a report of its observation for growing institutional participation. bitcoin bull Mike Novogratz has stated several times that there can be a huge inrush of institutional money flowing into the crypto market by mid-2019.

Also, there is a common notion developing that unclear regulations are stopping institutional players from entering the crypto space. While this narrative is gathering heat within a large number of investors, Bloomberg has another story to present.

Regulators Not a Major Hurdle to Institutional Entry

In its latest article, Bloomberg says, “The biggest roadblock to Wall Street behemoths rolling out cryptocurrency businesses could come from their own clients, rather than from regulators.” In their latest report, Bloomberg cites the observations made by fintech entrepreneur and Revolut Ltd. founder – Nikolay Storonsky.

Revolut, currently valued at over $1 billion allows retail investors to speculate on cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and Ether. While speaking at the Web Summit 2018 in Lisbon, Storonsky said that Wall Street institutional giants have little interest in cryptocurrencies. This could possibly make things difficult for big financial institutions like ICE and Fidelity who are targetting institutional players by derivative products tied to digital assets.

“Unless these big institutional investors and hedge funds move heavily into the crypto world I just don’t think banks will move because they simply try to make money from their clients,’’ said Storonsky. “There is no interest from big institutional investors so far.’’

If Storonsky’s claims are true, it can crash down huge hopes of thousands of retail investors. After this year’s severe meltdown, the crypto market is now eagerly waiting for institutional entry. However, Storonsky’s views are quite similar to BlackRock CEO Larry Fink. Earlier this year, Fink said that his company’s clients have “zero interest” in cryptocurrencies.

Moreover, just last week in a CNBC interview, Fink said that his company won’t launch an ETF product until the market is “legitimate”. However, he noted that BlackRock has not closed the doors to crypto investments and associated products.

Big Institutions Preparing for Next Crypto Run

A number of traditional financial institutions, which were earlier hostile to cryptocurrency, are now warming up to them. Morgan Stanley is reportedly working on swaps for the bitcoin Futures. However, it will start trading them only after having a proven institutional demand. Other banking giants like Citi Group and Goldman Sachs are also working on bitcoin products.

However, Storonsky says that this year has been so far quite bad for the crypto market. Revolut’s bitcoin trading volumes are as low as just 20 percent to what they were during December 2017. For the fortunes of the crypto market to turn over, 2019 will likely have to show some huge improvements. However, he still feels that Wall Steet won’t be the prime beneficiary of it.

“Fintech will be very big in crypto for the foreseeable future,’’ he said. ‘’I just don’t think banks will catch up.’’

A Low Interest from Institutional Investors Impedes Wall Street Crypto March

Previous Article

A Low Interest from Institutional Investors Impedes Wall Street Crypto March

Next Article

Ethereum [ETH/USD] Technical Analysis: Speculations flash green in hopes of uptrend

You might be interested in …

Interview: Cryptographer Silvio Micali on Bitcoin, Ethereum and Proof of Stake

Interview: Cryptographer Silvio Micali on Bitcoin, Ethereum and Proof of Stake

Silvio Micali is an MIT professor and Turing Award–winning cryptographer known for his work in technologies that form the bedrock of blockchains today: public-key cryptosystems, digital signatures, pseudorandomness and multiparty computations. He is also the co-inventor of the zero-knowledge proof.

In the ’90s, he worked on Byzantine agreement, a protocol for getting nodes in a distributed system to agree on a state change. And in 2012, he and long-time collaborator Shafi Goldwasser were co-recipients of the A.M. Turing Award, essentially, the “Nobel Prize in computing.”

Upon learning about bitcoin three years ago, Micali turned his attention from mechanism design, which had consumed him for the previous seven years, and dove headlong into creating a proof-of-stake algorithm. His project is called Algorand.

Put simply, Algorand relies on a novel form of Byzantine agreement with only nine expected steps. In each step, committee members, chosen at random in a private lottery, are replaced. The result is a high-security system with a negligible risk of forks.

According to Micali, recent tests show Algorand can process 2 MB blocks in 17 seconds, compared to bitcoin, which produces a 1 MB block every 10 minutes. (A paper on these results will be presented at SOSP, the biennial ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, later this month.)

In an interview with bitcoin Magazine, Micali explained why he thinks proof of stake is superior to proof of work, the consensus algorithm that underlies most cryptocurrencies today, including bitcoin and Ethereum. Although Ethereum, more often viewed as a smart contract platform, aims to transition to proof of stake next year.

Unnecessary Evil

Micali thinks proof of work was a great idea when it first came out, but now that we have seen the consequences, he calls it an “unnecessary evil” for several reasons.

“The first time I heard about bitcoin, I saw all the difficulties. To me, the main difficulty is the waste of computational resources. That is really appalling,” he said. “It drives up prices and depletes the planet of resources.”

Second, he sees miners as “a new center of power” and an orthogonal force to the real users of the system: the coin holders.

“If five mining pools can control what goes in or does not go in a block, in what sense is the ledger decentralized? You don’t want miners having control over the ledger, particularly when they have low margins, are far away and accountable to no one. I think it is a recipe for disaster,” he said.

Finally, transaction ambiguity does not sit well with him. In bitcoin, occasionally two blocks are found at roughly the same time, creating a temporary fork in the chain. When that happens, the branch with the greater hash power is elongated, while the other and its blocks “disappear.” If your transactions happened to be in an orphaned block, it will eventually get picked up again in the main chain, but for Micali, the idea is unsettling.

“Every time I see my transaction is in a block, I worry the block may disappear. But never mind anxious people like me; banks may not be willing to take on the additional risk,” he said. “Can you imagine a financial world where wire transfers could be taken back?”  

Natural Democracy

Micali thinks proof of stake is a better option. In proof of stake, there are no miners, just the coin holders. Further, a coin holder’s ability to create or validate a block is based on how many coins in the system he or she owns.

“This is a natural interpretation of democracy,” Micali said. “Your influence in maintaining the integrity of the system is based on how much you are really invested in the system.”  

But there is a catch: creating a proof-of-stake algorithm is hard to do. While several projects claim to have come up with a secure protocol, Micali thinks some of those claims are questionable. “The fact is, people can claim anything they want,” he said.

One of the biggest challenges in proof of stake is the “nothing at stake” problem. If the chain forks, the optimal strategy for any coin holder is to extend both chains to earn additional block rewards or to double spend. That goes against the central design goal of all blockchains: getting users to converge on a single chain.

Some projects are looking at ways to sculpt their proof-of-stake protocols by adding perks or punishments to get coin holders to abide by the rules. As part of that, some proof-of-stake systems require users to put up a type of security deposit or bond.

Micali feels a well-designed proof-of-stake cryptocurrency should stand on its own, however, without extra measures. He thinks bonding opens doors to bad actors.

“Let me ask you, what fraction of your disposable income can you put on the table and not touch?” he said and suggested that honest people will put up only a small amount, ceding control to bad actors with big pockets.

“The danger is that only bad people will give up control over a large amount of money to manipulate the system. And if they earn much more money by misbehaving, they will be happy to lose what they put on the table,” he said.

He also disagrees with the idea of using punishment to get users to fall in line.

“A weak state rules through threats and fear,” he said, comparing the practice to barbaric punishments used by some nations to fight crime. Why do they do it? Because criminals are so rarely caught, he said. “So once they catch one, they disembowel the poor guy.”

He continued, “Do you want to oust somebody who misbehaves? Of course. But a well organized system is one in which you don’t need to punish people.”

bitcoin and Ethereum

Most people view bitcoin solely as a cryptocurrency, but Micali thinks the greatest value of bitcoin and Ethereum are as enablers of smart contracts, in which users can stipulate if-then conditions around payments.  

“At the end of the day, doing only payments is easy,” he said, adding that he did not want to trivialize the problem. “Of course, decentralized payments are better than centralized payments, but what really differentiates a cryptocurrency from any other form of money is that you can actually do a smart contract.”

Based on that, he thinks that both bitcoin and Ethereum would benefit from implementing the best consensus algorithm available. Currently, both systems are “huffing and puffing,” he said. bitcoin is constrained to 7 transactions per second, while Ethereum can process only 15 per second, compared to Visa’s 2,000 per second.

“If the blockchain scales, isn’t it better for bitcoin and Ethereum? If the blockchain has a [mathematical] proof of security, isn’t it better for its users?” he said. “If the blockchain cannot be hijacked by miners who are accountable to nobody and live in some faraway jurisdiction, isn’t that a plus for all users?” Micali thinks so.

The post Interview: Cryptographer Silvio Micali on Bitcoin, Ethereum and Proof of Stake appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.