March 31, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Tesla Had a Record Quarter, so Why Did its Shares Just Nosedive?

Tesla had a record quarter, so why did its shares just nosedive?

Tesla Had a Record Quarter, so Why Did its Shares Just Nosedive?


Tesla model 3 shares elon musk

Shares for electric carmaker Tesla took a nosedive on Wednesday after the Elon Musk brainchild once again failed to meet production targets.

Record Quarter Can’t Save Tesla from Missed Targets

Pre-market trading saw Tesla shares tumble more than 8 percent on Wednesday. The losses continued following the opening bell, and as of 9:52 am ET shares were trading at $302.12 — down 9.16 percent from Monday’s close at $332.80.

Tesla share price
Tesla shares saw a sharp decline on wednesday morning.

The catalyst for the plunge was the release of fourth-quarter production and delivery results, which demonstrated improvements from July’s “manufacturing hell” but were nevertheless short of Wall Street analyst targets.

Tesla delivered 90,700 vehicles during the fourth quarter, a new all-time high, closing the year with a total of 245,240 deliveries compared to 102,807 in 2017. Production also ramped up during the fourth quarter, enabling the company to complete 86,500 vehicles, up 8 percent from the previous quarter.

Even so, analysts had expected more of the electric carmaker, anticipating that it would complete 92,700 deliveries across its Model 3, Model S sedan, and Model X SUV. Tesla had previously stoked investor optimism by claiming that improvements in efficiency had reduced the number of labor hours needed to build the Model 3 by 30 percent.

Tesla Banks on Model 3 Production Improvements

Tesla model 3
Los angeles, usa – november 30, 2017: tesla model 3 on display during la auto show at the los angeles convention center.

Tesla is banking that the Model 3, which currently starts at $46,000 but is expected to feature a cheaper base model in the near future, will prove to be affordable enough to help electric car adoption grow beyond a niche consumer base of affluent buyers primarily located on the coasts. However, the company delivered just 63,150 Model 3s in the fourth quarter, missing analyst targets by 1,750 vehicles.

“As we continue to focus on quality and efficiency rather than simply pushing for the highest possible volume in the shortest period of time, we expect to have a slightly more gradual ramp through [the first quarter], likely ending the quarter at a weekly rate of about 2,500 Model 3 vehicles,” Tesla said Wednesday, per the Wall Street Journal.

Compounding investor anxiety was the company’s announcement that it would slash prices on all Tesla models by $2,000, with the price cut intended to offset a reduced federal tax credit that took effect on Tuesday. Previously, Tesla buyers had been eligible for a $7,500 federal tax credit on electric vehicle purchases, but as of Jan. 1, the federal government has trimmed that credit to $3,750.

Meanwhile, Tesla isn’t the only firm having a rough start to the 2019 trading year. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nasdaq, and S&P 500 indices all opened to major losses following the release of weak economic data from China.

The cryptocurrency markets, in contrast, showed gains across the board, with the bitcoin price rising a steady 3.2 percent and ethereum surging by 11.88 percent.

Featured Image from Shutterstock. Price Charts from TradingView.

We are hiring full-time and part-time journalists based in the United States. Ideal candidates will have extensive knowledge of traditional markets and/or the cryptocurrency industry. Apply for a position here.

Advertisement

Published at Wed, 02 Jan 2019 14:59:19 +0000

Previous Article

The Daily: Wallet Brings Bitcoin to Facebook, Fortnite Store Accepts Crypto

Next Article

Bitcoin – Move

You might be interested in …

Why Traders Are Now Selling Insurance To Protect Against Volatility: A “Feedback Loop” Theory

zerohedge.com / by Tyler Durden / Apr 7, 2017

Over the past several months, one of the proposals floated on this website to explain the strange collapse in volatility at a time when uncertainty has soared, was the so-called “negative convexity” gamma trade, demonstrated best by the Catalyst Funds’ Hedged Futures Strategy Fund in mid-February, according to which traders buying vol has led to dealers offsetting these purchases with more than proportional purchases of offsetting underlying assets as a hedge, in the process pushing sending realized – and thus implied – volatility even lower.

Today, the WSJ picks up on this idea, and looks at a possible “feedback loop” scenario in which selling of volatility leads to even more selling of volatility, resulting in a market in which the VIX appears oddly disconnected from prevailing nervous sentiment. According to the WSJ’s Jon Sindreau, the theory, advanced by several money managers, bankers and analysts, “describes a type of feedback loop in which calm markets make selling insurance against sharp swings in asset prices profitable, which makes the markets more calm, which then makes selling insurance yet more attractive. And on and on.”

READ MORE

The post Why Traders Are Now Selling Insurance To Protect Against Volatility: A “Feedback Loop” Theory appeared first on Silver For The People.

Litecoin Price Analysis: LTC/USD Turns Bearish Below $50

Ethereum World News Litecoin Price Analysis: LTC/USD Turns Bearish Below $50 Litecoin price extended declines below the $50.00 support against the US Dollar. LTC/USD is under a lot of pressure below the $50.00 and $51.00 […]