May 16, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Slovenia: Local Bank Forced to Stop Selling Cryptocurrency Via ATMs

Slovenia: local bank forced to stop selling cryptocurrency via atms

Slovenia: Local Bank Forced to Stop Selling Cryptocurrency Via ATMs

Slovenia: local bank forced to stop selling cryptocurrency via atms

A tiny bank in Slovenia has been forced to stop selling cryptocurrency from its ATMs. Hranilnica Lon only had 15 automated teller machines but announced proudly last September that they’d decided to allow the purchase of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies directly from the machines. This was done via BitIns coupons, which are traded directly for digital currency. Since launching the initiative, the bank claims to have sold coupons for more than half a million euros worth of cryptocurrency. This is fairly impressive for such a small bank in just four months.

The news that they’d be halting immediately followed a press conference by Banka Slovenije on January 18. There was little reasoning given at the time. However, since then STA and Total Slovenia News have learned from “unofficial information” that the decision was made based on a legislative provision restricting banks from selling financial products. Since the law in Slovenia does not recognise cryptocurrency as a financial product, Hranilnica Lon is excluded from offering bitcoin and other digital currencies from their ATMs or in-branch.

Slovenia has previously gained a reputation for being a cryptocurrency-friendly nation. Exchange platform BitStamp was headquartered there in their early years and the country has become something of a hotbed for initial coin offerings. However, with the rising popularity of the new sector, clamourings for more protective legislation have also been increasing. There are many who fear the risk of abuse has grown so pronounced that greater regulation is sorely needed.

In the central bank’s press conference on January 18, it was stated that they were not seeking to regulate cryptocurrencies directly themselves. They did suggest that the European Central Bank was mulling over legislation to cover the entire eurozone, however. The bank also acknowledged that digital currency could pose a risk to the financial stability of nations should the amount of money pouring into them continue to increase.

Published at Thu, 08 Feb 2018 19:30:24 +0000

Altcoins

Previous Article

Dr. Moe Levin Joins Advisory Committee at 4NEW

Next Article

SEC, CFTC Breathe Life Into Floundering Crypto Market

You might be interested in …

Spain seeks to pass crypto-friendly legislation

Spain Seeks to Pass Crypto-Friendly Legislation

Spain Seeks to Pass Crypto-Friendly Legislation Adam James · February 18, 2018 · 11:00 am While other European countries seek stricter regulations on cryptocurrencies, Spain looks to follow Switzerland’s lead and charge ahead of the […]

tZero STO交易合約架構解析 – Anton Cheng – Medium

tZero STO交易合約架構解析 – Anton Cheng – Medium 在進入tZero的架構解析之前,我們要先理解,證券型代幣相較於傳統的ERC20代幣有什麼不同,以及為什麼要有所區隔。 說直接一點,ERC20代幣是不合法律規定的,它只是Ethereum上面對於代幣的一個統一協定罷了。之前泡沫嚴重的ICO風潮就是大家濫發ERC20 Token作為募資手段的實例。對於投資者而言,基本上ICO的投資不會有任何保障,但相對的這完全符合去中心化的思想,你的隱私受到完全保護,沒有人知道也不需要知道每一個投資者(或代幣使用者)是誰。 而Security Token呢,是希望將證券上鏈,這些上鏈的Token就會如同一張股票一樣,交易、流通所有過程都會受到嚴格監管。為什麼會要這麼做呢?因為在ICO熱浪中我們就發現,許多公司試圖做的就是透過發行ERC20 Token作為公司股份,這儼然就是現在金融市場中的證券了。這些金融商品在金融市場中需要被監管,怎麼可以隨便換個名目就到鏈上拿來詐騙了呢? 說了這麼多,最重要的就是「監管」二字。ERC20 Token的合約中,transfer 這個函數做的就是把合約中一個地址的餘額提高,一個地址的餘額減少,除了餘額外不會對兩個地址有其他檢查。而在Security Token的合約中,transfer 就多了一個步驟去run一個叫做 canTransfer的函式。這個函式就是整個ST合約中最精華的部分,它檢查了兩個地址雙方是不是在所謂的「受監管白名單」中,如果這兩個地址其一不在被具有交易資格,或是交易上限等等不符合規定的話,就會觸發 revert,直接終止合約。 所以,所謂證券型代幣上鏈其實可以簡化成兩個部分:鏈上白名單的監管,以及其他交易規則的程式化(合約化)。 接下來的部分,我們就來看看tZero的合約中如何實現這兩點。以下所有的圖片以及souce code都可以從tZero GitHub上面找到,有興趣進一步了解的也可以在裡面找到更多資訊喔。 從上圖我們可以看得出來,整個tZero的系統由 Registry, Compliance, ERC-20, 以及 Rules 四大合約組成,並且是以Compliance為中心。我們就一一來介紹他們的作用以及彼此之間的互動關係。 ERC20 ERC20 Token Contract […]