May 30, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Ripple Price Technical Analysis – Can XRP/USD Break 100 SMA?

Ripple price technical analysis – can xrp/usd break 100 sma?

Ripple Price Technical Analysis – Can XRP/USD Break 100 SMA?

Key Highlights

  • Ripple price formed support near the $0.7500 level and recovered recently against the US dollar.
  • There was a break above a declining channel with resistance at $0.8000 on the hourly chart of the XRP/USD pair (data source from Kraken).
  • The pair must clear the 100 hourly simple moving average and $0.8600 resistance to gain traction.

Ripple price is recovering with a bullish angle against the US Dollar and bitcoin. XRP/USD needs to settle above $0.8600 to extend gains in the near term.

Ripple Price Resistance

After a major decline, Ripple price formed a support base near the $0.7500 level against the US Dollar. The price started an upside wave and recovered above the $0.7800 resistance. The recovery was positive since the price moved above the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the last drop from the $0.9640 swing high to $0.7500 swing low. It ignited more upsides and the price moved above $0.8200.

During the upside move, there was a break above a declining channel with resistance at $0.8000 on the hourly chart of the XRP/USD pair. Therefore, it seems like the recent break above $0.8080 and $0.8200 is positive above $0.8080 and $0.8200. At the moment, the price is struggling to break a previous support at $0.8500. Moreover, the 100 hourly SMA is positioned near $0.8550. Lastly, the 50% Fib retracement level of the last drop from the $0.9640 swing high to $0.7500 swing low is near $0.8600 to prevent upsides.

Ripple price technical analysis xrp usd

Looking at the chart, the price has to clear the $0.8500, 100 hourly SMA and $0.8600 to gain further. A successful close above the $0.8600 resistance may open the doors for a push towards $0.8900. On the downside, supports area t $0.8200 and $0.8080.

Looking at the technical indicators:

Hourly MACD – The MACD for XRP/USD is slightly in the bullish zone.

Hourly RSI (Relative Strength Index) – The RSI for XRP/USD is currently just above the 50 level.

Major Support Level – $0.8080

Major Resistance Level – $0.8600

Published at Fri, 27 Apr 2018 06:30:59 +0000

Analysis

Previous Article

Daily Discussion Megathread – April 27, 2018

Next Article

Wax- Rosana (Dirty)

You might be interested in …

Lombrozo: Bitcoin Core Developers May Never Use Miner-Focused BIP 9 Signaling Again

core-BIP9.jpg

One of the key points of contention in the politicization of bitcoin protocol development over the past couple of years has been the concept of miner signaling. While not intended to be a vote among miners to decide the future of the bitcoin network, Ciphrex CEO and Bitcoin Core contributor Eric Lombrozo pointed out that miners are now using the signaling process as leverage in the discussion over bitcoin scaling.

Lombrozo made the comments during a discussion with host Thomas Hunt and bitcoin developer Jimmy Song on Hunt’s Mad Bitcoins YouTube channel.

“This whole signaling thing is a huge problem that I think created a very terrible narrative,” said Lombrozo.

What Is BIP 9?

BIP 9 is a method of rolling out soft-fork upgrades to bitcoin. The short description of this process is that soft-forked changes will be enabled once 95 percent of miners have signaled to the network that they are ready for activation, using a trick called “version bits.”

“It was an arbitrary system created by developers in order to coordinate smooth soft-fork transitions,” said Lombrozo. “It was not designed to be a political system for voting on controversial issues ever — that was never the intention.”

Lombrozo also noted that, in the past, soft forks have been deployed on bitcoin without any special treatment for miners, and BIP 9 was supposed to solve some of the issues miners could face during the deployment of a soft fork.

“It was introduced for the courtesy of miners to be able to reduce their orphan rates and reduce the probability that they’re going to end up mining blocks that are actually invalid — that was the real motivation behind it,” said Lombrozo.

According to Lombrozo, the goal is still to get nodes upgraded and enforce the rules of the soft fork; BIP 9 was simply a technique to coordinate with miners.

The Ciphrex CEO added that there was nothing like miner signaling in the original version of bitcoin, and Satoshi Nakamoto never used miner signaling for the soft forks that he deployed on the network.

“It was a mechanism that was created way later,” said Lombrozo. “And once this mechanism was created, it was abused and turned against the developers to try to extort stuff. And now it’s being used against businesses to extort stuff from them.”

BIP 9 Does Not Work With Uncooperative Miners

According to Lombrozo, BIP 9 would not have been used for Segregated Witness (SegWit) if the contributors to bitcoin Core knew then what they know now.

“If we considered that there had been this kind of, like, contentious or adversarial situation, then BIP 9 would not have been used,” said Lombrozo. “We would not have used the signaling mechanism because it obviously does not work under those kinds of circumstances.”

In Lombrozo’s view, miners are now using the effective veto power that comes with the miner signaling process outlined in BIP 9 as leverage in the discussions around scaling bitcoin. He also believes bitcoin Core developers may deserve some of the blame for using BIP 9 in the first place.

“But at the same time, we only had the best of intentions at the moment,” added Lombrozo. “We thought we’d gotten through all these disagreements and it seemed like the miners were for it and going to support it … Obviously, the adversarial case needs to be considered because it’s just the nature of this network and the way that it works.”

Lombrozo suggested that miners also used miner signaling as a sort of “propaganda” tool with bitcoin Unlimited, even though there was no activation mechanism included in the code.

Never Use BIP 9 Again?

According to Lombrozo, miners now think they have some control over the protocol due to the use of the miner signaling process outlined in BIP 9.

“Miners started thinking, ‘Hey, maybe we have control over the protocol because of this whole signaling thing,’” said Lombrozo during his discussion with Hunt and Song.

Lombrozo claimed that “we’re never going to use BIP 9 to deploy anything almost for sure” if SegWit is not activated via the current BIP 9 deployment.

As an alternative, bitcoin Core could turn to BIP 8, which is a variation of BIP 9 from pseudonymous developer Shaolin Fry that eventually activates a soft-forking change whether miners have signaled for it or not. Miners can still activate the change before it is automatically locked-in on the network, but approval from miners is not required before that lock-in takes place.

Watch the full episode here:

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTCB5bRGQj0?feature=oembed&w=480&h=270]

The post Lombrozo: Bitcoin Core Developers May Never Use Miner-Focused BIP 9 Signaling Again appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.