May 26, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Market Recovers by $5 Billion but Why Are Ethereum and Bitcoin Cash Plunging?

Market recovers by $5 billion but why are ethereum and bitcoin cash plunging?

Market Recovers by $5 Billion but Why Are Ethereum and Bitcoin Cash Plunging?


Ethereum wallet dapp cryptocurrency
Advertisement

Over the last 24 hours, the crypto market has added $5 billion to its valuation, demonstrating a slight recovery from $106 billion to $111 billion. Despite the recovery of the market, Ethereum (ETH) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) continue to fall in value, both recording a three percent drop against the U.S. dollar.

On December 9, the Ethereum price fell by around three percent from $97 to $93, failing to sustain the short-term momentum it garnered from an unforeseen recovery it experienced on Saturday. Since its daily peak, Ethereum has declined by more than six percent against the U.S. dollar, from $100 to $93.

bitcoin Cash has also demonstrated a weakness in its short-term price trend as it lost nearly half of its value within a two-week period. Since November 6, the Bitcoin Cash price declined from $200 to $100, by exactly 50 percent.

Market recovers by $5 billion but why are ethereum and bitcoin cash plunging?Why is Ethereum and bitcoin Cash Dropping So Rapidly?

The gap between Ethereum and Ripple, which recently took over Ethereum as the second most valuable cryptocurrency in the global market, has increased to more than $3 billion within a three-week span.

Technical indicators demonstrate oversold conditions but the sheer intensity of the drop in the price of the two cryptocurrencies have created a difficult environment for the two assets to recover or even maintain a low price range.

It is possible that as investors in the cryptocurrency market resort back to fundamentals, cryptocurrencies that have struggled to see a noticeable increase in accessibility, adoption, and usability are falling harder than bitcoin.

Ethereum, for instance, as seen in the case of ConsenSys, the largest blockchain software company in the world, has been successful in creating an efficient infrastructure for decentralized applications (dApps) to a certain extent, but struggled to see much progress in Plasma, Sharding, and Casper, the projects three major solutions to scaling.

ERC20 tokens, most of which are based on Ethereum, given its dominance in the smart contract sector, have also failed to showcase products that can actually be used by casual users and the mainstream.

Seeing a clear lack of adoption of dApps and decentralized systems, Joseph Lubin, a co-creator of Ethereum and the founder of ConsenSys, said that the company will move forward and begin focusing on the development of products that can be utilized by users in the ecosystem.

Lubin said in an email sent to the company’s employees:

“ConsenSys 2.0 requires us to evaluate our endeavors more rigorously. We will seek to run leaner projects because often better decisions are made in a context of more constrained resources. Scarcity sharpens the senses and forces discernment in decision making. Lush plentitude, while perhaps a noble goal in many circumstances, should be hard won; otherwise it leads to complacency and dull-wittedness.”

bitcoin Cash, a cryptocurrency with a large transaction capacity, has seen limited merchant adoption which it sought out for when it first launched in August.

bitcoin Will Likely Survive Better in Bear Market

With large-scale financial institutions like Nasdaq, NYSE, ICE, and Fidelity vowing to build infrastructure around bitcoin first, the dominant cryptocurrency is expected to continue to outperform both major digital assets and small market cap cryptocurrencies throughout the bear market.

Featured Image from Shutterstock. Charts from TradingView.

Get Exclusive Crypto Analysis by Professional Traders and Investors on Hacked.com. Sign up now and get the first month for free. Click here.

Advertisement

Published at Sun, 09 Dec 2018 03:46:17 +0000

Previous Article

Mediar crowdsale announced

Next Article

Market Recovers by $5 Billion but Why Are Ethereum and Bitcoin Cash Plunging?

You might be interested in …

China's state media takes aim at crypto trading, icos

China's State Media Takes Aim at Crypto Trading, ICOs

China's State Media Takes Aim at Crypto Trading, ICOs China’s state-owned news agency appears to be stepping up rhetoric on over-the-counter (OTC) crypto trading and overseas initial coin offerings (ICOs), calling the blockchain use cases […]

Alex Tapscott’s Nextblock Global Receives Major Backlash Prior to Public Offering

Things have gone from bad to worse for Alex Tapscott this past week. Several of his projects have received a lot of scrutiny. Moreover, there are some allegations which have to be rectified as well. Nextblock Global, the company owned by Alex Tapscott, will invest in companies and projects focusing on ICOs. However, the list of advisors for this company is mostly fake. Not a big surprise, but it is still rather worrisome.

Most people in the cryptocurrency world know the name Alex Tapscott. He is a well-known author and Canadian investors. However, his latest business venture raises a lot more questions than answers. Nextblock Global is a very dubious business model, to say the least. Not because of the investing angle, but everything else about it seems pretty fake. Especially the list of alleged advisors contains names which aren’t even associated with this venture.

Trouble Ahead for Nextblock Global

Some of those names include Andreas Antonopoulos and Dmitry Buterin. It is unclear why their names are on the list of advisors, to begin with. Neither of these gentlemen is even remotely connected to this new venture. There are some other names on the page which may also be completely fake, including Vinny Lingham and Kathryn Haun. It is disconcerting to see these names listed on a site they don’t even want to be associated with. It is a common tactic among semi-scammy ICO ventures, though.

The big question is why Alex Tapscott made such a grave mistake. It is evident these names were included to make the company more legitimate. However, it is unclear if this is his doing or someone else’s. The official explanation is how they were “listed in a draft version”. Even so, these names shouldn’t be there unless they agree to be a part of it. A weak explanation, to say the very least. This doesn’t bode well for the future of Nextblock Global either.

It is evident this whole ordeal will cause a lot of heated debate. The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce has rebuked its underwriting of the Nextblock Global public offering. This is the only logical decision as long as these “issues” are still being discussed. It is a very strange and potentially unfortunate turn of events. Whether or not there was any foul play involved, will always remain a question. It won’t do the reputation of Alex Tapscott any favors either right now. Then again, if this is an error, it should all blow over pretty soon.

Header image courtesy of Shutterstock

The post Alex Tapscott’s Nextblock Global Receives Major Backlash Prior to Public Offering appeared first on NEWSBTC.