July 23, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Israel Supreme Court Temporarily Stops Account Closure for a Cryptobased Business. Will this set a Precedent or is it a Mere Setback on Bank’s Tensive Relationships with Cryptobased Businesses?

Israel supreme court temporarily stops account closure for a cryptobased business. Will this set a precedent or is it a mere setback on bank’s tensive relationships with cryptobased businesses?

[ad_1]

Israel supreme court temporarily stops account closure for a cryptobased business. Will this set a precedent or is it a mere setback on bank’s tensive relationships with cryptobased businesses?

Israel Supreme court issued precedent setting injunction that some observers expect to impact on the current jittery relationship between conventional banks and crypto-based businesses.  The injunction which was issued on 26th February, 2018, stopped Bank Leumi from halting the accounts of a crypto accepting company merely on the basis of that its revenue is derived from trading in cryptocurrencies.

Leumi Bank took the decision to block payments to crypt-exchanges from December last year basing its decision on anti gambling laws and directives from the Bank of Israel. The Supreme Court Judge was of the view that assumption of possible violation of law was merely speculative and thus cannot form basis of denial of service.

The court stated, inter alia, that “The damages that may be caused to the Bank as long as the request is accepted are considered to be speculative at this time. The Bank’s decision is based on the assumption that the Company’s activity does indeed entail risks that arise in violation of the law, But for the past five years that the account has been operating, these fears have not materialized – as the District Court has determined, according to which the company acted transparently and did not violate any provision of law.”

The Judge also added that the injunction was “not intended to harm the bank’s rights to analyze with specificity every transaction that takes place with the bank account or to take any actions that are related to minimizing risks, which become transparent through the activities of the company.”

Mr. Zioni of Zioni Pillersdorf Phillip, the lawyer for the crypto company, welcomed the Supreme Court decision as a ‘courageous precedent’ for the emerging crypto trading industry.

The celebration of injunction notwithstanding, of interest to the industry will be how the court’s reasoning will inform other courts around the world in determining similar litigation, if any,  by crypto-based businesses and impact of such decisions on the interactions of crypto-based businesses with conventional banks.

 

Ahmed Ali

Israel supreme court temporarily stops account closure for a cryptobased business. Will this set a precedent or is it a mere setback on bank’s tensive relationships with cryptobased businesses?

[ad_2]

Source link

Previous Article

litecoin cryptocurrency review – bitcoin product review 03 coinomi litecoin no transaction fee

Next Article

Swiss Watchmaker Chronoswiss Reveals Limited Edition Cryptocurrency Watches

You might be interested in …

Why Traders Are Now Selling Insurance To Protect Against Volatility: A “Feedback Loop” Theory

zerohedge.com / by Tyler Durden / Apr 7, 2017

Over the past several months, one of the proposals floated on this website to explain the strange collapse in volatility at a time when uncertainty has soared, was the so-called “negative convexity” gamma trade, demonstrated best by the Catalyst Funds’ Hedged Futures Strategy Fund in mid-February, according to which traders buying vol has led to dealers offsetting these purchases with more than proportional purchases of offsetting underlying assets as a hedge, in the process pushing sending realized – and thus implied – volatility even lower.

Today, the WSJ picks up on this idea, and looks at a possible “feedback loop” scenario in which selling of volatility leads to even more selling of volatility, resulting in a market in which the VIX appears oddly disconnected from prevailing nervous sentiment. According to the WSJ’s Jon Sindreau, the theory, advanced by several money managers, bankers and analysts, “describes a type of feedback loop in which calm markets make selling insurance against sharp swings in asset prices profitable, which makes the markets more calm, which then makes selling insurance yet more attractive. And on and on.”

READ MORE

The post Why Traders Are Now Selling Insurance To Protect Against Volatility: A “Feedback Loop” Theory appeared first on Silver For The People.

Cardano bullrun expected when ada added to coinbase

Cardano BULLRUN EXPECTED WHEN ADA ADDED TO COINBASE

Cardano BULLRUN EXPECTED WHEN ADA ADDED TO COINBASE Do you think Cardano (ADA) Could be added to Coinbase? In this video we explore the possibility of $ADA going on Coinbase and we explore the impact […]