July 13, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Elon Musk: ‘Bitcoin’s Structure is Brilliant’ But Not For Tesla

Elon musk: ‘bitcoin’s structure is brilliant’ but not for tesla

Elon Musk: ‘Bitcoin’s Structure is Brilliant’ But Not For Tesla

Sorry — Elon Musk may like bitcoin, but Tesla isn’t getting involved with cryptocurrencies anytime soon. Nevertheless, the CEO of SpaceX believes BTC has its pros (and cons).


On a podcast with ARK Invest, Musk explained that bitcoin and Tesla simply don’t mix. “bitcoin’s structure is brilliant but I don’t think it would be a good use of Tesla’s resources to get involved in crypto,” he said.

As noted by CNBC, Musk made note of bitcoin’s fundamental value propositions as a decentralized currency capable of undermining traditional financial institutions and fiat currencies. However, he also participated in the common rhetoric that the market-leading cryptocurrency is, perhaps, too energy intensive. He stated:

Paper money is going away and crypto is a much better value for a transfer of value than pieces of paper but it has its pros and cons. It’s very energy intensive to create bitcoin at this point.

Elon musk

Just Kidding

Musk famously tweeted about bitcoin on Oct 23, 2018, when he asked if anyone wants to purchase the first and foremost cryptocurrency with an anime illustration. As noted by CNBC, the tweet got Musk’s account temporarily suspended for violating rules about selling bitcoin on the social media platform.

When asked about the incident, he stated: “I was just joking.”

When Torch?

Meanwhile, Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) recently called upon Musk to take the now-famous Lightning Torch — a relay transaction circulating through the Lightning Network since January. However, the enigmatic CEO of SpaceX did not answer the call, much to the dismay of bitcoin proponents and Lightning Network early adopters everywhere.

What do you think of Elon Musk’s claim that Tesla won’t be getting involved with bitcoin anytime soon? Do you think the day will come when the company will get involved with the first and foremost cryptocurrency? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below! 


Images courtesy of Twitter, Shutterstock, Flickr.

Published at Wed, 20 Feb 2019 13:00:35 +0000

Previous Article

Satoshi’s donations is the new Like

Next Article

TNAH, The Never Affordable Hoax

You might be interested in …

What is 1337?

What is 1337?

What is 1337? Joined a party, and this kid was talking about the worlds best clan ever. 1337 leet what is leet what is 1337 whats does 1337 mean

Bitcoin Bites Back: Wells Fargo in Court After Halting Exchange Transfers

The parent company of cryptocurrency exchange Bitfinex, iFinex, is suing Wells Fargo over disruption to wire transfers.


Bitfinex: Court Move To ‘Prevent Precedence’

Court documents filed by the company, along with fellow conversion service Tether.to in San Francisco, relate to the global bank allegedly blocking outgoing wire transfers to the banks servicing them.

“Wells Fargo has suspended U.S. dollar wire transfer operations needed to remit to plaintiffs’ customers U.S. dollars that the customers deposited with plaintiffs to purchase digital currency,” the complaint reads.

Bitcoinist compliance

It adds that the bank’s actions were “causing imminent and irreparable harm to plaintiffs.”

In additional comments on Reddit, Bitfinex spokesman commented that the lawsuit was to “prevent precedence” and that if nothing was done, the phenomenon could repeat itself with other cryptocurrency businesses.

He said:

“We’re not going to rollover for action like this. It’s precisely why we have increased our legal department.

“The decision to initiate legal action is because we cannot allow precedence in this industry where clearing houses can disrupt businesses that are by all metrics complying with the rules in place.

“If we allow them to simply flip a switch and disrupt business, then there becomes a precedence in the bitcoin industry beyond just Bitfinex, so we believe it is the appropriate time to take action to prevent precedence.”

Fickle Banks Meet Their Match At Last

The decision to disrupt liquidity flow for the two services could well represent the most severe instance of a bank declining service to cryptocurrency businesses.

Previous instances include Venezuelan exchange Surbitcoin’s temporary shutdown due to a banking refusal, while flagship New Zealand exchange bitNZ disappeared for good after operating for six years due to its bank’s sudden decision to cut ties.

Not just exchanges, but entities from across cryptocurrency have felt the effects of banks’ changing whims. UK news resource Coinjournal had its bank account frozen by Barclays in September last year, allegedly over connections with bitcoin.

Regulations Bite Poloniex in Washington State

Meanwhile further up the West Coast, Washington State is to lose services from another bitcoin exchange, this time Poloniex.

In a circular to customers, “careful consideration of the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions’ interpretation of its financial services regulations” had resulted in the suspension of service for residents “until further notice.”

Ethereum Classic

Customers affected have two weeks from April 6 to remove funds from their accounts. Before the deadline, they are also prohibited from “opening new margin positions, adding to existing ones, and lending funds.”

Bitfinex itself exited Washington State for the same reasons back at the beginning of March. Unlike Poloniex, however, the exchange hinted there would be no return, and its users had markedly less time to react.

What do you think about the Wells Fargo case? Let us know in the comments below!


Images courtesy of Shutterstock, poloniex.com

The post Bitcoin Bites Back: Wells Fargo in Court After Halting Exchange Transfers appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.