Crypto Markets Show No Friday 13th Fear as Assets U-Turn on Previous Losses
markets staged a modest comeback Friday, July 13, following a week in which lost over 5 percent against the dollar and over 7 percent.
Data from Cointelegraph’s price indices and show a rebound from weekly lows of $6,180 for bitcoin, which had hit highs of .
Market visualization from
At press time Friday, BTC/USD is trading around up just about one percent on the day, this week’s downward momentum failing to crack support around the $6,000 barrier.
bitcoin’s general price pattern continues to reflect a curious pattern of sudden losses followed by de facto flat performance, a cycle which commentators have failed to fully explain.
Accusations of market manipulation by actors ranging from to have not seen sufficient evidence, with denying theories major bagholders are dictating market performance.
For Ethereum, prices have continued to broadly fluctuate around bitcoin, Friday’s reversal also seeing about one percent gains against a broader weekly decline around 6.2 percent. At press time, ETH/USD is circling .
Ethereum price chart. Source: Cointelegraph
The return to form of the two largest cryptocurrencies has in turn produced copycat behavior from the majority of the top 50 cryptoassets, with most seeing 1-4 percent gains today. rose over 4 percent Friday, while is up a notable 8.4 percent, leading the top 25 coins.
Bancor’s token, which lost around one third of its value this week after its issuer , has so far failed to reverse its losses, up a modest 0.8 percent today.
As Cointelegraph continues to report, many commentators from the cryptocurrency industry and beyond continue to hold a bullish stance on prices in the medium term.
A last month by Chinese exchange saw the majority of respondents to its survey forecast a “substantial” increase by the end of the year, 71 percent believing markets will expand by over 30 percent of current levels.
TenX’s Julian Hosp , this week committing to a bitcoin price target of $60,000 by the start of 2019.
NYPD Enlists bitcoin ATMs to Help Strangle Phone Scams By CCN: Crypto-oriented phone scams are alive and well across the country. One sneaky tactic involves posing as law enforcement, a crime in and of itself, […]
A closer look — Dharma-larm – Circle Research – Medium “[Dharma] helps achieve our mission of creating a borderless, permissionless, and generic credit market by bringing liquidity to our ecosystem projects.” Brendan Foster Crypto lending has become […]
There are few people who have worked in the blockchain technology space for so long and maintained such a seemingly disinterested and skeptical perspective on the emerging technology as Tim Swanson. Through numerous books and a blog, Tim has shown a knack for going out of his way to do deep within the blockchain space.
This week on Let’s Talk bitcoin, Tim Swanson, Director of Research at Post Oak Labs, talked with Epicenter’s Brian Fabian Crain and Sebastien Couture.
His most notable work within the space has happened as Director of Market Research at R3, the first blockchain enterprise consortium for the financial services industry. During his time at R3, Tim assessed several hundred entities — companies, startups and universities — working on some type of blockchain initiative. His experience gave a full range of good, bad and ugly business operations and blockchain propositions that existed in the early stages of this industry.
Whether you agree with his stoic perspective or not, it may be a good remedy for the mania that has resulted from bitcoin’s phenomenal price increase this year. As new investors flood in the crypto community and more and more people begin talking about blockchain technology, it’s never a bad idea to be reminded of how the industry has developed.
“Historically, we’ve seen a lot of manias happen in tech: social media, solar panels, AR, VR, etc. I don’t see the benefit in becoming a fanboy in anything at this early, early stage.”
On the current state for the enterprise blockchain market
Swanson proposed that there has been a significant shift of attention in 2017 from enterprise blockchain to Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), due in large part to the amount of money that has been raised this way. Referencing the , Swanson believes blockchain enterprise adoption is currently in the “trough of disillusionment.” This stage comes after the initial peak of expectations where interest wanes as experiments and implementations fail to deliver. This is also where many producers of the technology either give up or receive continued investment for improving the products to the satisfaction of early adopters.
“The problem as a whole for the enterprise blockchain space is that it hasn’t managed any of the expectations it initially set out to accomplish. In the beginning, there were brash claims like putting the entire United States equities market on a blockchain in less than a year. Over time, it became clear that something like that was not possible. Because of the unmanaged expectations coupled with the retail enthusiasm coming from the consumer side seeing how blockchain could help them, where in reality, enterprise is a long-term cycle and build-out, many people lost interest once they realized they could make money much faster through ICOs.”
Swanson listed a number of startups working on the enterprise blockchain side in New York, London and the west coast, including , , and , among others, as well as and , both of which Swanson still advises.
“If you look at funding for those companies — as an aggregate they’ve raised maybe $400-450 million dollars. For comparison — and it’s not an accurate comparison — ICOs in the month of June raised over $600 million dollars. It was a shift in enthusiasm from people who wanted to get very rich, very quickly. The fact of the matter, even for ICOs, is that you can’t bypass the requirement-gathering necessary to build a platform that can work with existing institutions and existing regulatory and industry requirements.”
“You can’t just build an aeroplane, convert it into a helicopter then sell it to a bunch of helicopter enthusiasts. Ultimately, somebody will have to build applications and that’s why building an ecosystem and community is so important.”
Why Aren’t There Any New Enterprise Blockchain Companies?
Swanson attributed the lack of new enterprise blockchain companies to the difficulty new startups face in working against the existing competition within the space. Established companies have a head start in acquiring the essential ingredients for success in the enterprise blockchain space: capital and some kind of partnership with regulators or players of the existing infrastructure.
Furthermore, Swanson suggested that most of the obstacles encountered by enterprise blockchain companies could be easily surmounted by larger players:
“Large enterprises like Oracle, IBM, Sap, Microsoft have the capacity and budgets to acquire any of the enterprise startups. Oracle alone could acquire all the enterprise startups themselves and not blink much of an eye.”
Transitioning from Proof of Concept to the Pilot Stage
Swanson stated that one of the most critical obstacles for enterprise blockchain startups to be mindful of are the (PFMI). These are a set of standards adopted after the 2008 financial crisis which the international community considers fundamental to strengthening and preserving financial stability.
“These principles are intended to prevent a snowball/domino affect where a local problem could potentially take down an entire system,” said Swanson. Due to the nature of these principles and how they interact within existing financial infrastructure, changing legacy infrastructure by integrating a blockchain that does not comply with these principles is far more time consuming and costly.
“Within these large corporations, you can’t just turn off legacy infrastructure, then turn on your blockchain version and continue production. Things have to be run in parallel for a while. It takes time and talent.”
The future of the blockchain in enterprise is not necessarily tied to more infrastructures, Swanson concluded. “Instead of building out more infrastructure, I am much more interested in seeing applications built on top of existing infrastructure.”
to hear Swanson on busting hype, the recent ICO spike and the rise of cryptocurrencies as a new asset class among other things.
