August 2, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Crisis at Crypto Exchanges? Bithumb Announces Cut in Workforce

Crisis at crypto exchanges? Bithumb announces cut in workforce

Crisis at Crypto Exchanges? Bithumb Announces Cut in Workforce

Crisis at crypto exchanges? Bithumb announces cut in workforce

Following a series of recent layoffs and closures within the industry, top Korean exchange Bithumb follows suit by announcing it will cut its workforce in half by the end of this month. While the market is currently showing signs of optimism, this news brings an unwelcome reminder to the realities of an extended bear market.

“Voluntary Retirement” At Bithumb

Coindesk Korea broke the news of Bithumb’s plans on Monday 18th March. Details show the company will reduce its existing workforce of 310 employees down to 150. A spokesman for the firm commented:

“It is true, voluntary retirement is planned to reduce the total number of employees by 50% by the end of the month.”

Bithumb has developed a company-sponsored program to help former employees. The initiative will provide support and training to find new work. However, news of more job cuts in the crypto space is bringing further uncertainty.

Crypto Exchanges Are Feeling The Pinch

Onchain Capital CEO, Ran Neuner, stated that crypto exchanges would continue to struggle in the coming year. He takes an unsympathetic view by attributing the difficulties to a lack of business foresight.

“I’m expecting more exchanges to shut down in this bear market. Last year everyone rushed to start an exchange. Exchanges require infrastructure that is expensive to maintain and most won’t survive this.”

The news of layoffs at Bithumb was the latest of many recent announcements, including:

CoinFloor

The UK exchange blamed declining trade volume as the cause of pressures on the company. In a statement, the CEO, Obi Nwosu, said:

“Coinfloor is currently undergoing a business restructure to focus on our competitive advantages in the marketplace and to best serve our clients. As part of this restructure, we are making some staff changes and redundancies.”

Huobi

Singapore-based Huobi ran into trouble as a result of falling bitcoin prices. A spokeswoman for the firm said they are optimizing staffing by cutting the worst-performing employees. But she was quick to point out that opportunities remain buoyant at the core of its business and in emerging markets.

Shapeshift

Shapeshift announced they were cutting a third of their staff as a result of their rush to expand. The CEO, Erick Vorhees, spoke about how restructuring was inevitable because the number of staff simply grew faster than the company could maintain.

Liqui

At the end of January this year, the Ukrainian-based exchange shut down its entire operation. A statement on their website reads:

“Much to our regret, after this step Liqui is no longer able to provide liquidity for the Users left. We also do not see any economic point in providing you with our services. However, we do not want to return to where we were a month ago. Hence, we decided to close all accounts and stop providing our services. It broke our hearts to do that.”

The Future

As the market adapts to tougher trading conditions, and heightened scrutiny from regulators, it is inevitable that some exchanges will struggle. While it would be extreme to call any of the exchanges above bad actors, or lacking in business acumen, we must remind ourselves that market forces will decide who will survive.

Published at Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:01:04 +0000

Previous Article

IBM and Stellar Lumens [XLM]’s World Wire ready for cross border payments in over 72 countries

Next Article

Blockchain Goes Hollywood is Expected to Attract Blockchain and Crypto Experts, Investors and Celebrities to Epic multi-day Event

You might be interested in …

Take Two: SEC to Review Its Bitcoin ETF Decision

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has announced that it will review its decision regarding the Winklevoss twins’ bitcoin ETF.


SEC to Review Its bitcoin ETF Decision

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will review its decision regarding the rejection of the bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) proposed by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss.

statement issued by the SEC in response to a petition for review of the Disapproval Order by the Bats BZX Exchange reads:

[…] it is hereby: ORDERED that the petition of BZX for review of the Division’s action to disapprove the proposed rule change by delegated authority be GRANTED; and It is further ORDERED that any party or other person may file a statement in support of or in opposition to the action made pursuant to delegated authority on or before May 15, 2017.

The SEC first rejected the bitcoin ETF (COIN) proposed by the Winklevoss twins last month, citing risk of fraud and a lack of regulation in the bitcoin markets. The statement in which the SEC rejected the COIN EFT reads:

As discussed further below, the Commission is disapproving this proposed rule change because it does not find the proposal to be consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices and to protect investors and the public interest.

The petition filed by the Bats BZX Exchange will see the SEC’s action to disapprove the bitcoin ETF reviewed and possibly amended. If so, COIN ETF shares would be traded on a public stock exchange, providing an easy way for investors to capitalize on the price of BTC without the need to deal with Bitcoin exchanges, wallets, private keys, and so forth.

Winklevoss Chose Bats Exchange For a Reason

As noted by Blockchain researcher and host of the Crypto Scam podcast, Tone Vays, ‎in a 2016 interview, it is very likely that the Winklevoss twins chose to work with the Bats BZX Exchange on the COIN ETF for this very reason. 

Vays

“My guess is the reason that they changed is that Bats is the new kid on the block, so they push the issues a bit,” Vays explained. 

Not only does it make sense for the Winklevoss twins to identify with the Bats BZX Exchange due to the “experimental” nature of the COIN ETF, but it is also a great strategic move that ensured the exchange they partnered with would help them fight to see the bitcoin ETF approved.

Vays continued:

Nasdaq might not have been helping the Winklevoss fight against the SEC to get this approved and maybe Batz said ‘you know what, we’ll throw your lawyers at it’.

The Saga So Far

The Winklevoss’ bid to see a bitcoin exchange-traded fund on public stock exchanges is a saga that has been going on for roughly three years. It started with the filling of an S-1 form for the Winklevoss bitcoin Trust in May 2014.

Twins

The Winklevoss bitcoin Trust was based on the twins’ substantial bitcoin holdings (roughly 1% of the total supply at the time) and had Math-Based Asset Services LLC as the sponsor of the Trust. Later that year, a follow-up filling was made in order list the Winklevoss bitcoin Trust as an ETF on the NASDAQ OMX exchange with the name “COIN.”

Two years later, in June 2016, the twins filed a document that would see the ETF listed on the Bats exchanged instead of Nasdaq. The same filing also saw the ETF offering increase from $20 to $65 million.

Last month, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) denied the Winklevoss Twins’ bitcoin ETF, which lead to the petition by the Batz BZX Exchange.

Do you think that the Winklevoss bitcoin ETF will be approved after the SEC’s revision? If so, let us know why in the comments below.


Images courtesy of Shutterstock

The post Take Two: SEC to Review Its Bitcoin ETF Decision appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.

Alibaba Advances Blockchain Food Fraud Platform to Pilot Phase

Altcoin Today Alibaba Advances Blockchain Food Fraud Platform to Pilot Phase Alibaba Advances Blockchain Food Fraud Platform to Pilot Phase Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba is trialling a blockchain platform for supply chain tracking in bid […]