October 10, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Coinbase Might Be Behind Those 856,000 BTC Worth of Transactions

bitcoin Magazine
Coinbase Might Be Behind Those 856,000 BTC Worth of Transactions
Coinbase might be behind those 856,000 btc worth of transactions

Last week, it was reported that a bitcoin whale had moved thousands of bitcoin into different wallet addresses. Between December 1 to December 6, 2018, the whale split 856,000 bitcoin between 107 wallets, sending an equal 8,000 BTC into each wallet.

Speculators have formulated different hypotheses since the monstrous sum was moved. Was it a market whale moving funds to Over-the-Counter (OTC) markets? Could the sender be the Foundation for Economic Education (Fee.org)? (This second theory is highly improbable as the listed address on the organization’s website reveals it has only ever received a total of 2.2 BTC.)

According to a report published on 8BTC, it’s likely the “whale” was merely Coinbase conducting routine maintenance on its infrastructure. 8BTC’s hypothesis is based on a Coinbase announcement that mentioned the exchange was going to make “monitored movements” two days prior to the transactions being made.

U.S digital asset platform Coinbase had announced a scheduled maintenance on November 29, 2018.

“Over the next seven days, Coinbase will be running scheduled maintenance across our platform that may cause movements on all Coinbase-supported blockchains. These are controlled, closely monitored movements that are being performed in order to provide enhanced security and protection for our customers.”

Inactive Address

The commotion surrounding these coin movements began on December 4, 2018, when 66,452 BTC was transferred from a wallet address that had not sent funds since 2014. The funds were then distributed evenly across 100 wallet addresses.

Once that transfer was complete, a new transaction of 66,379 BTC was transferred from another whale address and distributed equally between 101 wallet addresses. A few days after this, another transaction was initiated, followed by another round of distributing the bitcoin into different wallet addresses. This time, 8,000 BTC was transferred into 107 addresses for a total of 856,000 BTC: a total that accounts for over 5 percent of the total bitcoins in circulation.

The report also suggests that the exchange might have used the SegWit “bc1” addresses to chop off the transactional costs while splitting the funds, which is a standard security protocol used to hedge risk and protect funds from a single point of failure.

Other Big Moves

Large sums of ether, ripple and bitcoin cash (BCH) have been moved in the last 30 days, as well, though there is no indication thus far that these transfers are related. In one instance, a day before BCH hard forked on December 5, 2018, a wallet address transferred over 1 million BCH ($300 million) to another address. Six days ago, 100,271 BCH, worth over $14 million, was moved.

This article originally appeared on Bitcoin Magazine.

Coinbase might be behind those 856,000 btc worth of transactions Coinbase might be behind those 856,000 btc worth of transactions

Coinbase might be behind those 856,000 btc worth of transactions

Previous Article

Bitcoin – Hoping $3k Has Some BOUNCE In Her

Next Article

BITCOIN $30k/$46k

You might be interested in …

Thomas Peterffy on CME Futures: “A Catastrophe in the Cryptocurrency Market… will destabilize the real economy.”

Chairman of Interactive Brokers, Thomas Peterffy, has voiced concerns about the plan to launch a bitcoin Futures contract. According to their CEO, Terry Duffy, the CME Group intends to offer the listing as early as the second week in December. However, Peterffy is worried about the implications of a crypto-based Futures market. For him, the violent swings associated with digital currencies and assets could spell disaster for investors, as well as the economy as a whole.

Interactive Brokers are themselves a CME clearing member and through an open letter dated November 14, 2017, they requested that “the Commission require that any clearing organisation that wishes to clear any cryptocurrency or derivative of a cryptocurrency do so in a separate clearing system isolated from other products.”

For Peterffy, there is “no fundamental basis for valuation” of cryptocurrencies and the volatility common within markets is cause for concern. He highlighted the lack of a “mature, regulated and tested underlying market” and declared that determining the amount of funds necessary to margin such a product is “impossible”. For him, drastic movements in price could affect many more than just a few unlucky traders:

… a catastrophe in the cryptocurrency market that destabilizes a clearing organization will destabilize the real economy.

He continued:

“If the Chicago Mercantile Exchange or any other clearing organization clears a cryptocurrency together with other products, then a large cryptocurrency price move that destabilizes members that clear cryptocurrencies will destabilize the clearing organization itself and its ability to satisfy its fundamental obligation to pay the winners and collect from the losers on the other products in the same clearing pool.”

However, Peterffy and Interactive Brokers did suggest a way to mitigate the risk. They advocate keeping cryptocurrency derivatives entirely separate from other financial products. To protect the members of clearing organisations from the “unique risks in clearing cryptocurrencies” they should remain “isolated”.

Before signing off, Peterffy offered his and his company’s support to help CME investigate and safeguard against such supposed dangers:

We would be happy to discuss this with you or to provide any further information at your convenience.

 

Image: ShutterStock

 

 

 

The post Thomas Peterffy on CME Futures: “A Catastrophe in the Cryptocurrency Market… will destabilize the real economy.” appeared first on NEWSBTC.

Bitcoin update 27-12-18

BITCOIN UPDATE 27-12-18

bitcoin UPDATE 27-12-18 EN English (UK) EN English (IN) DE Deutsch FR Français ES Español IT Italiano PL Polski SV Svenska TR Türkçe RU Русский PT Português ID Bahasa Indonesia MS Bahasa Melayu TH ภาษาไทย […]