July 4, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Chainalysis Report: Two Groups Responsible for Most Publicly Reported Hacks

Chainalysis report: two groups responsible for most publicly reported hacks

Chainalysis Report: Two Groups Responsible for Most Publicly Reported Hacks

Chainalysis report: two groups responsible for most publicly reported hacks

Two “prominent professional hacking groups” are responsible for the majority of publicly reported hacks of cryptocurrency exchanges and other cryptocurrency organizations, concludes a report published by blockchain data analytics firm Chainalysis this week. According to the report, simply called the Crypto Crime Report, the groups generated around $1 billion of hacking revenues for themselves so far.

“Hacking dwarfs all other forms of crypto crime, and it is dominated by two prominent, professional hacking groups,” the report states. “Together, these two groups are responsible for stealing around $1 billion to date, at least 60% of all publicly reported hacks.”

Hacks

Exchanges, wallet providers and other custodial services have been prime targets for cybercriminals for years. From the MyBicoin theft and ₿itcoinica hacks in ₿itcoin’s early days, to the infamous Mt. Gox collapse due to stolen funds and the Bitstamp and Bitfinex hacks more recently, to the Cryptopia theft just several weeks ago, hacks and thefts are a recurring theme in the cryptocurrency space.

Now, Chainalysis’ report suggests that many of the same people may be responsible for most of these kinds of hacks. By tracing the movement of funds on from hack to exit point (the exchange where funds were ultimately converted into fiat currency), Chainalysis believes it has been able to pinpoint two prominent hacking groups. Dubbed “Alpha” and “Beta” by the blockchain analytics firm, these two groups, together, would have been responsible for about 60 percent of publicly reported hacks, worth a total of $1 billion, with an average of $90 million per hack.

Furthermore, the Chainalysis report notes that both Alpha and Beta went through lengths to shuffle the coins they stole, seemingly in an attempt to obfuscate the source of the funds. This mostly involved a huge amount of transactions moving the stolen funds from address to address, the report notes: “The hackers typically move stolen funds through a complex array of wallets and exchanges in an attempt to disguise the funds’ criminal origins. On average, the hackers move funds at least 5,000 times.”

This shuffling was combined with periods of inactivity, presumably to wait until interest in the hacks would die down before converting the cryptocurrency proceeds into fiat currency.

Motives

Interestingly, Chainalysis did find that Alpha and Beta are shuffling their loot around using different, independently distinguishable strategies. The blockchain data analytics firm even believes this reveals something about the nature and intent of the two groups.

“[W]e suspect that […] Alpha, is a giant, tightly controlled organization partly driven by nonmonetary goals,” writes Chainalysis. “They appear as eager to create havoc as to maximize profits. Alpha seems much more sophisticated, expertly shuffling funds around in a way that suggests they want to avoid detection.”

Meanwhile, Beta — the smaller of the two — appears less organized, less skilled at moving the funds around, and more focused on the money itself, according to the report: “They don’t appear to care very much about evading detection, just about getting a clear route to convert illicit assets to clean cash.” In one case, Beta is said to have cashed out more than $32 million in one go.

Both groups have been successful in funneling much of their proceeds to exchange it for fiat currency, Chainalysis writes, as more than half of all the hacked funds were converted in less than four months, and about three quarters of the hacked funds were cashed out within six months. This was largely done by using regular exchanges, according to the report, which Chainalysis believes was possible because “exchanges and law enforcement have had limited ability to track hacked funds.”

The report does not detail which hacks were analyzed, where the proceeds were cashed out, or any more identifying information about the Alpha or Beta groups. Chainalysis did not respond to inquiries by bitcoin Magazine before time of publication.

You can download the Chainalysis report here.

Published at Fri, 01 Feb 2019 22:45:35 +0000

Previous Article

Blockstream Unveils ‘Proof Of Reserves’ Tool to Prove Exchange Liquidity

Next Article

Fiat To Crypto Now Available With trade.io Credit Card

You might be interested in …

Re: 台湾中正大学被要求改名 校方:改成阿里山大学?

Re: 台湾中正大学被要求改名 校方:改成阿里山大学? 中新网3月1日电 据台湾《中国时报》报道,昨天是228纪念日,但有学校蒋中正(蒋介石)铜像被破坏,更有团体要求以“中正”为名的学校必须改名。台“教育部次长”蔡清华表示,学校内要不要有蒋中正铜像,或是“中正”的校名要不要改,由各校自行决定,台“教育部”不会强迫。   辅大校园内的蒋中正铜像昨天(2月28日)被学生破坏,而有“独派”团体要求台当局全面拆除所有蒋中正铜像,并更改以其名字命名的街道、建筑物或机构,包括中正大学、中正纪念堂等。   蔡清华说,以“中正”为名的学校,是不是要将名字改掉,学校可以通过校内民主程序去讨论,台“教育部”不会一定要他们怎么做;至于校园内的蒋介石铜像,也由学校自行决定去留。   对于被点名要求改校名,中正大学发表声明表示,校方坚守政治中立、学术自由的立场,对于各方意见,予以尊重。   中正大学副校长柳金章表示,多年前学校曾讨论要不要将“中正”的校名改掉,但后来不了了之,最近校内没有人再提起这件事。他说,中正大学位于嘉义县,当初成立时不一定跟蒋介石有直接关系,如果要改名,“难道要改为阿里山大学”?   柳金章指出,学校改名兹事体大,中正大学已成立28年,校友遍布各行各业,一旦改名,校友的认同将受冲击,而且毕业证书、学校财产登记等,都要重新处理,这是一个大工程,“不是说改就能改”;除非校内或校友有人提案主张修改校名,才会启动讨论程序,否则现在“中正大学”的名字应该会持续下去。 (Why?) Published at Thu, 02 Mar 2017 06:06:15 +0000 [wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]