May 6, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Winklevoss Twins Sue Bitcoin Investor Charlie Shrem

Winklevoss twins sue bitcoin investor charlie shrem

Winklevoss Twins Sue Bitcoin Investor Charlie Shrem

Winklevoss twins lawsuit

The Winklevoss twins have filed a lawsuit against infamous BitInstant founder Charlie Shrem. They claim the bitcoin investor stole 5,000 Bitcoins from them in 2012.

Winklevoss Twins Lawsuit

According to the New York Times, Shrem made several lavish purchases in 2018 that caught the attention of the Winklevoss twins. They filed a civil suit against him, convinced that Shrem made these purchases—which include a $2 million house and luxury cars—using the Bitcoins he had stolen from them in 2012.

Shrem Worked for the Winklevoss Twins Before Lawsuit

The twins hired Shrem in 2012. Tasked with building up a cryptocurrency stockpile, he had access to thousands of dollars to purchase bitcoin.

At this point in time, bitcoin was worth around $12 per coin.

Enter Your E-mail Address To Subscribe

* indicates required

I want e-mail alerts, updates, and offers and agree to the CryptoCurrencyNews privacy policy.

The Winklevoss twins’ lawsuit claims that around $60,000 worth of bitcoin was never accounted for. At approx $12 per coin, this value meant around 5,000 Bitcoins. However, 5,000 Bitcoins in today’s market is worth roughly $30 million.

At that value, the Winklevoss twins have decided to push forward on the matter even though it has been a contentious issue between the parties for several years.

>> BNP Paribas, HSBC, and 10 Other Banks Launch Hong Kong Blockchain Trade Finance Platform

Shrem’s Legal Team Contests Winklevoss Lawsuit

Charlie Shrem is obviously fighting the accusation. A representative from his legal team gave this response:

“Winklevoss Capital Fund has brought an utterly baseless civil lawsuit against Charlie Shrem. The lawsuit erroneously alleges that about six years ago Charlie essentially misappropriated thousands of bitcoins. Nothing could be further from the truth. Charlie plans to vigorously defend himself and quickly clear his name.”

However, Shrem has had run-ins with the law before. He was arrested in 2014 and served two years in prison for “operating an unlicensed money transmitting business, money laundering conspiracy and willfully failing to file suspicious activity reports with banking authorities.”

According to Prosecutors, Shrem conspired to launder $1 million worth of bitcoin to help Silk Road users make anonymous and illegal purchases.

Transactions on the Blockchain

The truth should lie in the Blockchain. It is claimed that Shrem sent the missing Bitcoins to addresses that he controlled. He subsequently would have forwarded the coins to other wallets. If this is the case, the answer should be in the log.

Featured Image: Depositphotos /© everythingposs

Sponsored Crypto Content

Published at Fri, 02 Nov 2018 21:15:55 +0000

Previous Article

Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Bitcoin Cash, EOS, Stellar, Litecoin, Cardano, Monero, TRON: Price Analysis, November 2

Next Article

NOVAM Pioneers the Concept of Biomimicry in Cyber Threat Mitigation – 5 Things to Know Before You Buy the NOVAM Token

You might be interested in …

Tether Claims a “Hack” Cost Them $30m, or is it an Exit Scam?

The big news of last night was how Tether allegedly got hacked. In a statement issued by the company, they explain how almost 31m USDT were removed from the Treasury. This incident occurred on November 19th, and the money was sent to an unauthorized address. None of the stolen tokens will be redeemed, but the company hopes to recover the money regardless. For now, the money still appears to be in a bitcoin address. It is unclear how this money will be spent, assuming that is even the objective.

This whole Tether issue is pretty worrisome, to say the very least. We have reported on this company’s odd behavior for some time now. Whether or not there is a malicious intent behind this attack, remains to be determined. The company did not explain how the money was moved from the Treasury exactly. That is always a bit worrisome, as companies should be transparent regarding what is happening. The stolen tokens have effectively been flagged and won’t be redeemable for USD.

The Plot Thickens for Tether

For the time being, the Tether back-end wallet service is suspended. This is part of the ongoing investigation to determine what caused this problem. Secondly, the Tether “chain” went through a hard fork to ensure the stolen funds can’t be moved. Considering how USDT is issued on Omni, new builds are being provided to Omni Core to make this happen. All individual users and integrators need to update their client as soon as possible. This is similar to how Ethereum bailed out The DAO investors when a similar issue occurred.

This new software will also cause a consensus change. It is a temporary hard fork to the Omni Layer. Any tokens belonging to the flagged bunch will not be accepted. This should prevent the attacker from successfully moving the USDT balance to an exchange. Otherwise, they could easily convert it to BTC or different altcoins and cash out that way. It is possible this may still happen, depending on how fast all integrators upgrade their clients. It is a very worrisome turn of events, to say the very least.

Some sources claim this was not a hack at all. Instead, they are fearful Tether is working toward a major exit scam. Their rapid issuance of new tokens, previous issues with converting back to USD, and now this certainly makes for a strange year for Tether. Whether or not the company can recover from this incident, remains to be determined, though. The company confirms all other assets are still backed by US Dollars in reserve. For now, everyone will have to believe that story. It may be the truth, though, but no one knows for sure at this point.

The post Tether Claims a “Hack” Cost Them $30m, or is it an Exit Scam? appeared first on NEWSBTC.

Bitcoin - (past) resistance isn't futile? $btc

Bitcoin – (past) Resistance isn't futile? $BTC

bitcoin – (past) Resistance isn't futile? $BTC EN English (UK) EN English (IN) DE Deutsch FR Français ES Español IT Italiano PL Polski SV Svenska TR Türkçe RU Русский PT Português ID Bahasa Indonesia MS […]