March 21, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

What Does the Dow Jones Toppling Mean for Cryptocurrencies?

What does the dow jones toppling mean for cryptocurrencies?

What Does the Dow Jones Toppling Mean for Cryptocurrencies?

What does the dow jones toppling mean for cryptocurrencies?
Advertisement

Join our community of 10 000 traders on Hacked.com for just $39 per month.

There were heavy losses in US markets on Thursday after President Trump announced the implementation of significant new tariffs on China as early as next weeks.

These tariffs will amount to approximately $50 billion on a yearly basis for Chinse exports. There is widespread fear that China will retaliate and financial market across the world will be plunged into further turmoil.

The Dow Jones was down 724.42 points for the day, which represents a 2.93% decrease. Analyst expect there to be further decreases before the weekend. Some are even going so far as to say this could represent the beginning of a reversal of the multi-year bull trend responsible for the record highs of the past few months.

The question on a lot of people’s minds is wether or not the falling Dow Jones present an opportunity for cryptocurrencies.

Why is this trade war such a big deal?

While President Trump has been threatening the introduction of trade tariffs for some time, they have finally become a reality. He wants to create a more protectionist economy whereby home-grown businesses can reap the benefits of this change in policy.

China has been one of his main targets since taking office, as he blames them for causing significant damage to US manufacturers and employment.  There is no doubting that China will not take this move lightly.

How could this trade war be good for cryptocurrencies?

While tariffs may appear to be a good idea on paper as they should protect the economy, in reality, it generally only ends up benefitting a small segment of the economy, with the rest of it suffering.

The US Dollar will weaken as a result of this approach and it may open up a move for more institutions to conduct transactions using cryptocurrencies.

Rather than having to deal with a weakening US Dollar, people may turn to using cryptocurrencies for their transactions and to store their wealth.

bitcoin, for example, has been dubbed “digital gold” and it is at volatile times that investors put their money in more conservative investments such as that of gold. Gold will usually retain its value as the financial markets worsen.

Cryptocurrencies may also be used to get around the trade restrictions that are in place. This means that significant fees and penalties can be avoided (albeit illegally) and transactions can go on as normal.

If the use of crypto becomes common practice, many institutions will realize the many benefits associated with this approach and may not return to fiat currencies when volatility in those markets has stabilized.

An event like this trade war could be the catalyst for a more significant and widespread adoption of cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange.

How might this not work out for cryptocurrencies?

In the world of finance, there are never any guarantees. There has been a massive bull market in the traditional financial word for many years now, with money being awash for institutional investors to spend as they please.

Many had the spare capital to invest in somewhat riskier investments, such as that of cryptocurrencies. However, if this trade war triggers a sustained bear market, this could lead to investments drying up in the crypto sector, dragging it into a bear market with the rest of the economy.

In a previous article, I myself theorized that that as financial market fears increase, the price of bitcoin decreases and vice versa. So far, I’ve been right.

Whatever happens, this will be fascinating to watch to see how the crypto markets react to sustained levels of turbulence in traditional financial markets as the United States and China battle it out in a trade war.

Follow us on Telegram.
Advertisement

Published at Fri, 23 Mar 2018 01:55:30 +0000

bitcoin Analysis[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]

Previous Article

Bug Caught That Allowed Coinbase Users to Garner Unlimited Amounts of Ether

Next Article

Facebook’s Data Security Meltdown Could Bolster Blockchain: Analyst

You might be interested in …

Core dev maxwell: uasf ‘does not measure up to standard’

Core Dev Maxwell: UASF ‘Does Not Measure Up To Standard’

bitcoin core developer Greg Maxwell has newly outlined why he “does not support” a user-activated soft fork (UASF) as it figures in BIP 148.


Maxwell: UASF ‘Guarantees Disruption’

In a circular to the Core mailing list Friday, Maxwell said that although he is not strictly against a soft fork, its incarnation in BIP 148’s UASF does not “really measure up to the standard set by segwit itself.”

The debate over whether to galvanize the entire bitcoin ecosystem into Segwit activation via a UASF has gained considerable traction over the last month.

Proponents say it is the quickest way to move bitcoin on from its current stalemate, yet detractors highlight its disruptive nature as a reason for caution. If a UASF occurred, for example, non-supportive miners would find their blocks invalid after the deadline, and would not receive rewards for their work.

Maxwell too notes that this “disruption” is a key difference between a UASF and segwit activation via miners.

“The primary flaw in BIP148 is that by forcing the activation of the existing (non-UASF segwit) nodes it almost guarantees at a minor level of disruption,” he continued. “Segwit was carefully engineered so that older unmodified miners could continue operating _completely_ [sic] without interruption after segwit activates.”

 

Time Still Not Of The Essence

Despite the increasingly slow and expensive nature of the bitcoin network, Maxwell still advocates a measured approach without speed as a priority.

…The fastest support should not be our goal, as a community– there is always some reckless altcoin or centralized system that can support something faster than we can– trying to match that would only erode our distinguishing value in being well engineered and stable.

First do no harm.’ We should use the least disruptive mechanisms available, and the BIP148 proposal does not meet that test.

The developer has meanwhile found himself under fire lately from bitcoin Unlimited proponents, notably Roger Ver, who released a dedicated presentation with quotes from Maxwell highlighting alleged errors.

“It’s important the users not be at the mercy of any one part of the ecosystem to the extent that we can avoid it– be it developers, exchanges, chat forums, or mining hardware makers,” Maxwell concluded.

Ultimately the rules of bitcoin work because they’re enforced by the users collectively– that is what makes bitcoin bitcoin, it’s what makes it something people can count on: the rules aren’t easy to just change.

Meanwhile, bitcoin’s recent price spike over $1,200 has been attributed by some to a sharp rise in the number of UASF-signaling nodes. Though this does not necessarily imply causation, the price has also dipped following the publication of Maxwell’s post.

What do you think about Greg Maxwell’s perspective on a UASF? Let us know in the comments below!


Images courtesy of uasf.org, twitter.com, shutterstock

The post Core Dev Maxwell: UASF ‘Does Not Measure Up To Standard’ appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.