February 20, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

What Do We Know About the CFTC Price Manipulation Probe

What do we know about the cftc price manipulation probe

What Do We Know About the CFTC Price Manipulation Probe

What do we know about the cftc price manipulation probe

On June 8, it was reported that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) demanded extensive trading data from several cryptocurrency exchanges in order to investigate whether there has been price manipulation in the crypto market.

Earlier, on May 24, Bloomberg reported that a criminal probe into Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) price manipulation by crypto traders had been opened by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in conjunction with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). That information was indirectly confirmed in the recent Wall Street Journal report, although it was made clear that the DOJ was studying potential price manipulation in a separate case. In May, some mainstream players, including former Wall Street executive and billionaire investor Michael Novogratz, and Cameron of Winklevoss twins, president of the Gemini exchange, greeted the probe.

What provoked the CFTC investigation?

According to the Wall Street Journal, the probe followed the launch of BTC futures by CME Group, a major derivatives marketplace, in December 2017. CME generates its BTC futures prices based on data from four major crypto exchanges: Bitstamp, Coinbase, itBit and Kraken, where manipulative trading could potentially have altered the value of BTC futures.

After the settlement of the first contract in January, CME asked the four exchanges to provide trading data. However, several of the exchanges refused to cooperate, saying that the request was intrusive. The crypto exchanges only handed over their data once CME shortened the time window of its request from one day to a few hours, according to the Wall Street Journal’s sources. It was also reported that CME originally sought the information through a third-party — a London-based company that calculates the bitcoin price to use for its futures contracts. The sources added that the crypto exchanges did not want to hand over data to the undisclosed British firm, which also runs its own trading platform.

CME is regulated by the CFTC, a federal agency dealing with futures and options markets in the U.S. The CFTC views Bitcoin as a commodity and is therefore subject to its direct supervision.

Thus, regulators from the CFTC were allegedly upset that CME does not have agreements which obligate crypto exchanges to share price data that is related to futures contracts. According to the Wall Street Journal’s sources, the quarrel between CME and the crypto exchanges led the CFTC to open an investigation.

Nevertheless, CME spokeswoman Laurie Bischel said that their London-based index provider has a disclosure agreement with all four exchanges:

“All participating exchanges are required to share information, including cooperation with inquiries and investigations.”

Kraken Chief Executive Jesse Powell told the Wall Street Journal that the “newly declared oversight” of how BTC prices form futures prices “has the spot exchanges [Eds: spot markets are non-futures exchanges] questioning the value and cost of their index participation,” while other exchanges declined to comment or didn’t respond at the time.

The Wall Street Journal article also mentions that the CFTC is coordinating their investigation with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). As mentioned above, last month the DOJ opened a similar — but separate — investigation into BTC and ETH price manipulation.

But how can one manipulate BTC price?

The Wall Street Journal’s article mentions ‘spoofing’ as one of the examples of illegal trading schemes that are investigated by CFTC. The May report regarding the separate criminal probe launched by DOJ also listed ‘wash trading’ in a similar context.  

Spoofing is a process when a trader (or a group of traders) creates an order for a substantial amount of BTC (or any coin, commodity, etc.) to form the illusion of exchange optimism or pessimism — depending on their goals — and then cancels it, i.e. when someone puts an order to sell 2000 BTC, it might cause some panic among traders, rushing them to sell their stock before the price drops, effectively dropping that price as a result. That’s what an entity named Spoofy would do on Bitfinex, according to a detailed blog on Hackernoon.

Similarly, an article in the Journal of Monetary Economics published by a group of academics in early January, suggests that the price of bitcoin was artificially bloated in 2013 by a single player operating on the largest exchange at the time, Mt. Gox (which then infamously shut down) and trader Sylvain Ribes published a Medium post in March, arguing that about $3 billion of all crypto-assets’ volume is trumped up.

Wash trading, in turn, is when a trader simultaneously sells and buys the same amount of BTC, essentially trading with himself. First, an investor will place a sell order, then place a buy order to buy from himself, or vice versa. Both activities, spoofing and wash trading, are illegal in the mainstream financial world, but it is worth noting that crypto markets are largely unregulated.

In theory, there are more ways to manipulate the price of BTC: the FICC Markets Standards Board (FMSB), the UK industry body overseeing standards in fixed income, currency and commodity trading, lists about 24 of them besides spoofing and wash trading. 

Market and community reaction

On June 10, the day after the Wall Street Journal report, crypto markets saw a sharp drop, as all of the top-100 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization were in the red over 24 hours, while total market capitalization was down by about $20 billion over the same period.

John McAfee, founder of McAfee Antivirus Software and crypto enthusiast who recently announced his bid to run for U.S. president in 2020 as a way to serve the crypto community, urged the community to not panic about the price drop:

“It is an overreaction to the news that Bitstamp, Coinbase, itBit and Kraken are being investigated for price manipulation. This will delay the bull market by no more than 30 days. Don't buy into the fear. Buy the coins.”

While the CFTC probe into four major exchanges is considered to be one of the reasons for the price drop, it might have also been related to the mainstream media reports regarding the security breach of South Korean crypto exchange Coinrail. However, this event is unlikely to have significantly impacted the price action on the markets, with Coinmarketcap data showing that Coinrail is the 99th largest crypto exchange, with a rather modest trading volume of about $2.5 million. The community’s reaction on Bloomberg, the Wall Street Journal, Reuters, the Guardian and others claiming that Coinrail’s hack had crashed markets seemed frustrated.

In late May, BTC fell as much as 4.3 percent to $7,267 shortly after Bloomberg broke news about the DOJ and CFTC investigation on May 24 that the media outlet posted as an update a few hours after the original publication, which also prompted some community members to accuse the publication of FUD.

Published at Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:37:44 +0000

bitcoin Regulation

Previous Article

Bitcoin Transactions Help Police Track Down Dark Web Drug Dealer

Next Article

ICO Review: Latium, Matryx, Bounty0X, Vezt, CoVesting, GoNetwork

You might be interested in …

Lamborghini gallardo spyder

Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder

Lamborghini Gallardo SpyderCars and Coffee EAP – Saint Cloud (92) Follow me on Facebook ! Suivez ma page sur Facebook !By Jean-Jacques MARCHAND on 2014-10-12 11:43:59

Re: 内蒙通报女生遭扒衣掌掴:索手机不成在厕所欺凌

Re: 内蒙通报女生遭扒衣掌掴:索手机不成在厕所欺凌 针对“内蒙古一穿校服女生遭迷彩服男子扒衣掌掴”一事,4月18日,内蒙古锡林郭勒盟西乌珠穆沁旗委宣传部官方微博@西乌发布 发布情况通报,称打人者和被打者均系西乌旗第二中学的学生,因索要手机不成召集同学将其带至卫生间实施欺凌;给予相关人员和责任人员严肃处理,目前教育部门已安排专业人员对受害学生进行心理疏导工作。澎湃新闻此前报道,4月17日,网上流传一段目击者拍摄的视频,一名穿着校服的女生站着,几名女生围观,旁边一名穿迷彩外套的男生踢向女生腰部并连扇其耳光,随后迷彩服男生双手扯开女生的衣服拉链使其内衣暴露,再连扇耳光,并大声叫嚷着“我让你跪着”。此时围观的两名红衣女生上前质问,对校服女生揪头发、扇耳光。其间,校服女生未还手。4月17日,锡林郭勒盟西乌珠穆沁旗委宣传部发布通报称,针对网传“内蒙古锡林郭勒西乌旗二中女生被同学扒衣掌掴”事件,西乌旗党委、政府等相关部门已经成立专项调查组进行调查。 4月18日,@西乌发布 发布后续情况通报:被打女生肖某和施暴的隋某某、姚某某、白某、恩某某均系西乌旗第二中学的学生,因隋某某向肖某索要手机不成,伙同其他三人将其带至教学楼卫生间,以掌掴、脚踢、撕扯衣服等手段进行欺凌。将根据《关于防治中小学生欺凌和暴力的指导意见》,给予相关人员和责任人员严肃处理。目前教育部门已安排专业人员对受害学生进行心理疏导工作。延伸 · 回顾网传内蒙古女生遭踢踹掌掴 教育局:已成立工作组 4月17日中午,有微博网友发布一段“内蒙古西乌珠穆沁旗二中打人侮辱事件”视频显示,一名身穿校服的女生遭两人踢踹、掌掴。今日下午,新京报记者从内蒙古锡林郭勒盟西乌珠穆沁旗(简称西乌旗)教育局核实到,视频中的事件发生在西乌旗二中,已成立专项工作组进行调查 (Why?) Published at Wed, 19 Apr 2017 04:06:46 +0000 [wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]{flickr|100|campaign}