February 22, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

US Regional Banks Begin to Cite Crypto as Business Risk

Us regional banks begin to cite crypto as business risk

US Regional Banks Begin to Cite Crypto as Business Risk

Us regional banks begin to cite crypto as business risk

It’s not just America’s biggest banks that are worried about cryptocurrency competition, public filings show.

WesBanco, according to the latest 10-K annual report submitted the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and published Feb. 27, cited cryptocurrencies as a possible business risk.

“[B]anks and other financial institutions may have products and services not offered by WesBanco such as new payment system technologies and cryptocurrency, which may cause current and potential customers to choose those institutions,” the bank wrote.

WesBanco primarily serves markets in the U.S. state of West Virginia, but it also operates in Kentucky, Indiana and Pennsylvania, among other nearby areas. It is West Virginia’s second-largest bank by assets, according to recent market data.

In another 10-K published earlier this month, Louisiana-based bank IberiaBank cited developments in fintech – naming bitcoin specifically – as a potential driver of competitive costs.

“Fintech developments, such as bitcoin, have the potential to disrupt the financial industry and change the way banks do business. Investment in new technology to stay competitive would result in significant costs and increased risks of [cybersecurity] attacks,” the bank wrote.

The filings are notable given the recent 10-Ks from banking giants Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase, all of which mentioned cryptocurrencies as a business risk.

“[T]he widespread adoption of new technologies, including internet services, cryptocurrencies and payment systems, could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services,” Bank of America wrote in its recent filing.

The acknowledgment from WesBanco is also noteworthy as it indicates that cryptocurrencies are on the radar of smaller, more regionally-focused banks in the U.S.

West Virginia map image via Shutterstock 

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is an independent media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. Have breaking news or a story tip to send to our journalists? Contact us at news@coindesk.com.

Published at Thu, 01 Mar 2018 15:00:46 +0000

News[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]

Previous Article

Nigeria's Central Bank Again Warns on Crypto Investments

Next Article

Introducing Tokens – Your Virtual Companions in the Alax App Store

You might be interested in …

Guest Post: Understanding the Limits and Potential of Blockchain Technology

Guest Post: Understanding the Limits and Potential of Blockchain Technology

The promise of blockchain technology is coming to the forefront and capturing the imaginations of investors, entrepreneurs and innovators alike. But what many people do not know is how perilous the blockchain journey ahead still is. We live in a world of smoke and mirrors; enterprise investors must do their due diligence in navigating these choppy waters — making the right investments in the right blockchain technologies to unlock that promised potential.

To make the correct investments, we need to adopt a framework to evaluate them. Having a framework also means having the necessary inputs. What follows in this article are some of these key inputs.

If you are considering making technology investments, think about the end state: your vision. How will this technology fit within your existing technology infrastructure? You need to put on your far- and short-sighted glasses: First, what will the near future (1–2 years) of the blockchain ecosystem look like? Second, how will this blockchain technology integrate with your existing infrastructure? Does it complement your technology investments thus far? Does it mitigate or add to any burdens in your existing technological landscape? All of these questions should inform your purchasing decision.

As an integration consultant and a blockchain architect, my role is to help clients determine what is in the realm of possibility for them and what is not. Questions surrounding scalability, integration points, data interoperability and security are not easy questions to answer, but they must be considered. Some potential investors will be blinded by the sheer potential (or hype) of the technology and will completely ignore these realities. As appealing as blockchain technology is, it’s not for everyone. Some enterprise investors are not at the maturity stage to adopt it yet, and this is not an easy pill to swallow.

Blockchain is a nascent technology and much work is still being done in the areas of interoperability (e.g., ISO/TC 307, Ripple ILP, Hyperledger Quilt, etc.). These are challenges to consider. It is important to understand that, in order to realize the full potential of blockchain technology, some elements of integration with your legacy system are probably still going to be necessary. Consider also how your private blockchain can be integrated with public blockchains — we live in a less-than-perfect world where there are multiple blockchains. Will the blockchain be on cloud or on-premise? These are questions you’ll need to answer; in fact, these very questions will also serve as inputs to your technology adoption framework.

Bigger Picture

As blockchain technology speeds toward standardization (via International Standard Organization, etc.) and interoperability (Interledger Protocols, Hyperledger Quilt, etc.), we also need to ask ourselves if having too many standards will stifle innovation and whether integration and interoperability are antithetical to the core tenet of blockchain technology, which is decentralization, for which I have yet to find an answer.

Finally, the benefits of interoperable and integrated blockchains are many: improved governance, interoperability, process automation, further cost savings and perhaps even cross-chain atomicity (a dream for now, at least). But we must not allow the benefits to blind us to the reality.

I wish to end this article on a hopeful note. Despite the many challenges when it comes to adopting blockchain technology, these challenges are not unique to the blockchain. Every new piece of technology goes through phases of uncertainty and exploration: this one, too, shall pass.


This is a guest post by Nathan Aw. Views expressed are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Media or bitcoin Magazine.

The post Guest Post: Understanding the Limits and Potential of Blockchain Technology appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.