March 14, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

UPDATE: Bitcoin macro view, non-linear regression

Update: bitcoin macro view, non-linear regression

UPDATE: Bitcoin macro view, non-linear regression

This is an update to my earlier post:

When I shared that chart, I emphasized that it was merely enternainment and it didn’t have any predictive value to me, AT ALL. I still have this point of view. Even though it might work out in the end, it must be understood that what I’m drawing here is some next level chart fitting. Humans have a tendency to see patterns where there are none, which might very well be true here as well.

So, with that out of the way, you’ll notice we are getting closer to our baseline curve. I said in my previous post I’d be starting up my weekly buy ins again if we ever got closer to that baseline. So far I haven’t, partly due to fear. I still believe in Bitcoins             long-term value proposition, but buying after big drawdowns reguires balls of steel that I apparently do not have. Price is still more than 4x above my last buy, and roughly 8x above my average buy in.

For those paying attention to the details: yes, I have adjusted the curves downward a bit (if you hit play in my old chart, youll see the price is closer to baseline than in this new chart). I’m not entirely sure how to draw these. I;m unsure of the regression model parameters, so I’m eyeballing it a bit as well. Baseline currently sits at around 2500 dollar. I have it even lower in another chart of mine. As I said, next level chart fitting.. Guess we’ll have to wait for a few more months, so we can retrofit these curves ;).

Long term: bullish . Short term: who the hell knows..
Stay safe everyone!

Published at Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:58:08 +0000

Previous Article

SHORT BITCOIN

Next Article

Bitcoin//I have seen this before

You might be interested in …

Ether Review Legal #6?'??'"?'?Playing in a Sandbox

In today?’?s long overdue, landmark episode we are joined by an international panel of leaders in fin-tech and blockchain law:

Claire Wivell, Hannah Glass (Australia), Alex Simms (New Zealand), Peter van Valkenburgh (USA), and James Duchenne (USA/Mauritius)

The theme for the discussion was regulatory sandboxes?’?Š?'”?’?Šframeworks for enabling businesses to operate in a deregulated environment. The goal is to allow legislative bodies to develop an understanding of new businesses before regulating them. We have seen a successful example in the United Kingdom, but Australia?’?s efforts to replicate this have not been so successful. Claire Wivell explains why.

We follow this with a discussion of the unique environments of Australia, Mauritius, Singapore and Dubai. New Zealand unfortunately is not so interesting at this stage (both Alex Simms and myself have independently been involved in some interesting conversations since this episode was recorded so watch this space).

We conclude that a US regulatory sandbox is impossible due to the interaction of federal and state legislation and the complexity of their enforcement agencies. However, there is hope if a bright line can be defined between the regulation of custodial and non-custodial businesses

consensys.net

consensysmedia.net

etherreview.info

https://itunes.apple.com//podcast/the-ether-review/id899090462?mt=2