January 22, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Trezor Warns Consumers as Trezor One Fakes Flood the Market

Trezor warns consumers as trezor one fakes flood the market

Trezor Warns Consumers as Trezor One Fakes Flood the Market


Trezor
Advertisement


Crypto hardware wallet provider Trezor has warned customers of a new method being used by thieves to steal cryptocurrencies from hardware wallets.

Trezor, known for its flagship hardware wallet Trezor One and the Trezor Model T, said unscrupulous individuals were distributing “one-to-one copy of Trezor One,” using it as a medium to steal other people’s money and tarnish the brandin a Medium post. The company said they had gotten accustomed to Trezor clones, created by legitimate companies and marketed under a separate name, but the revelations of the Trezor fakes are startling.

According to Trezor, the fake hardware wallet replicates the real wallet to the core, which makes it hard to distinguish from the original.

The fakes pose a security threat to the funds of cryptocurrencies and other digital assets of users, Trezor noted in the post.

“You would not entrust your money to somebody who has already cheated you by selling you a different product than you thought you were buying. We, therefore, recommend not to use this device and report it to us, which would help us fight these scams and provide you with a legitimate device.”

One way of distinguishing the fake Trezor One devices from the original is through the pricing. As with most clones, the end product is often offered at a very steep discount to encourage patronage, and this is a red flag Trezor hopes users can recognize when they see it.

Another way of distinguishing the real deal from the fakes is with the hologram that comes on the seal of the box. Trezor uploaded a video on the Activation Page for new hardware wallets so users can view and compare the hologram in the video with the one on their devices. The hardware wallet provider also warns customers to shun online marketplaces when buying their wallets and only make purchases from authorized resellers, the official Amazon store and on Trezor’s website.

“If you are not sure about the authenticity of the seller or the channel, always proceed with the official channels,” the post concluded.

The latest move comes on the heels of the recent bitcoin giveaway scams on Twitter, where hackers took control of verified and trusted Twitter accounts to offer free tokens to unsuspecting members of the public.

Featured image from Trezor.

Get Exclusive Crypto Analysis by Professional Traders and Investors on Hacked.com. Sign up now and get the first month for free. Click here.

Advertisement


Published at Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:59:46 +0000

Previous Article

Bitcoin SV: #Parabolic

Next Article

Bitcoin for Beginners Gold Coast (FREE)

You might be interested in …

Re: Новая монетка Factom (FCT)…

Re: Новая монетка Factom (FCT)… “Apparently, so I am told, there exist “people” who prefer to wipe sitting down. From the front. Initial research indicates it could be up to half the population.” — benjamindees […]

Gogocoin launch

gogocoin launch

gogocoin launchBy pinguino on 2014-08-27 08:32:47

Take Two: SEC to Review Its Bitcoin ETF Decision

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has announced that it will review its decision regarding the Winklevoss twins’ bitcoin ETF.


SEC to Review Its bitcoin ETF Decision

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will review its decision regarding the rejection of the bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) proposed by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss.

statement issued by the SEC in response to a petition for review of the Disapproval Order by the Bats BZX Exchange reads:

[…] it is hereby: ORDERED that the petition of BZX for review of the Division’s action to disapprove the proposed rule change by delegated authority be GRANTED; and It is further ORDERED that any party or other person may file a statement in support of or in opposition to the action made pursuant to delegated authority on or before May 15, 2017.

The SEC first rejected the bitcoin ETF (COIN) proposed by the Winklevoss twins last month, citing risk of fraud and a lack of regulation in the bitcoin markets. The statement in which the SEC rejected the COIN EFT reads:

As discussed further below, the Commission is disapproving this proposed rule change because it does not find the proposal to be consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices and to protect investors and the public interest.

The petition filed by the Bats BZX Exchange will see the SEC’s action to disapprove the bitcoin ETF reviewed and possibly amended. If so, COIN ETF shares would be traded on a public stock exchange, providing an easy way for investors to capitalize on the price of BTC without the need to deal with Bitcoin exchanges, wallets, private keys, and so forth.

Winklevoss Chose Bats Exchange For a Reason

As noted by Blockchain researcher and host of the Crypto Scam podcast, Tone Vays, ‎in a 2016 interview, it is very likely that the Winklevoss twins chose to work with the Bats BZX Exchange on the COIN ETF for this very reason. 

Vays

“My guess is the reason that they changed is that Bats is the new kid on the block, so they push the issues a bit,” Vays explained. 

Not only does it make sense for the Winklevoss twins to identify with the Bats BZX Exchange due to the “experimental” nature of the COIN ETF, but it is also a great strategic move that ensured the exchange they partnered with would help them fight to see the bitcoin ETF approved.

Vays continued:

Nasdaq might not have been helping the Winklevoss fight against the SEC to get this approved and maybe Batz said ‘you know what, we’ll throw your lawyers at it’.

The Saga So Far

The Winklevoss’ bid to see a bitcoin exchange-traded fund on public stock exchanges is a saga that has been going on for roughly three years. It started with the filling of an S-1 form for the Winklevoss bitcoin Trust in May 2014.

Twins

The Winklevoss bitcoin Trust was based on the twins’ substantial bitcoin holdings (roughly 1% of the total supply at the time) and had Math-Based Asset Services LLC as the sponsor of the Trust. Later that year, a follow-up filling was made in order list the Winklevoss bitcoin Trust as an ETF on the NASDAQ OMX exchange with the name “COIN.”

Two years later, in June 2016, the twins filed a document that would see the ETF listed on the Bats exchanged instead of Nasdaq. The same filing also saw the ETF offering increase from $20 to $65 million.

Last month, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) denied the Winklevoss Twins’ bitcoin ETF, which lead to the petition by the Batz BZX Exchange.

Do you think that the Winklevoss bitcoin ETF will be approved after the SEC’s revision? If so, let us know why in the comments below.


Images courtesy of Shutterstock

The post Take Two: SEC to Review Its Bitcoin ETF Decision appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.