March 20, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

These Cryptofunds Say ‘Generalized Mining’ Is the New Way to Invest

These cryptofunds say ‘generalized mining’ is the new way to invest

These Cryptofunds Say ‘Generalized Mining’ Is the New Way to Invest

These cryptofunds say ‘generalized mining’ is the new way to invest

Crypto investors are pushing each other to actively participate in the networks they fund.

A segment of the blockchain world has been buzzing since at least last fall about “generalized mining,” an idea that the decentralized web invites users to contribute resources to running different services – all while earning rewards for doing so. Extended to the investment community, that means directly engaging the networks you invest in.

The latest funds to make the case for direct involvement are CoinFund and Placeholder, with a new partnership revealed first to CoinDesk. The partnership comes in tandem with the launch of the Grassfed Network, an initiative meant to showcase CoinFund’s commitment to helping its portfolio projects achieve network effects.

“CoinFund and Placeholder have both spoken previously on the use of generalized mining as a differentiated strategy for cryptofunds to directly engage networks and generate returns,” CoinFund wrote in a Medium post announcing the initiative. “These services include, but are not limited to, transaction processing, staking, software or Merkle Mining, content curation, market making, active governance, and many others.”

Investors began articulating this perspective over social media, and many of those conversations point back to a Twitter thread that CoinFund founder Jake Brukhman shared in October, in which he concluded:

“Not only does #GeneralizedMining enable investors to add measurable concrete value to their portfolio networks through bootstrapping, liquidity provision, and operational loss-leading; cryptoinvestors are also the best-positioned profile for this type of early network engagement.”

New protocols need users, and Grassfed is meant to dramatize that dynamic. CoinFund is already providing support to live networks such as Livepeer, Steemit, Compound and others.

Anti-fragile engagement

Placeholder has consistently been interested in protocols that allow different kinds of stakeholders to participate in different ways. From its backing of Aragon, MakerDAO and Decred, the fund has consistently invested in optimizing cooperation.

Placeholder has been bullish on Decred. As we previously reported, the protocol was conceived to improve bitcoin governance by sharing authority over the network across stakeholders. Decred holders stake tokens to win a chance to participate in governance, and Placeholder will delegate their tickets to Grassfed’s voting service, marking an ongoing collaboration across the two funds.

Putting voting into the same category as hashpower stretches what some longtime crypto watchers think of as “mining,” but CoinFund actually takes the notion even further: including putting crypto into on-chain loan-making services, starting with Compound.

“We see any activity that is compensated with on-protocol rewards denominated in network assets as ‘generalized mining,’” Devin Walsh, an analyst at CoinFund, told CoinDesk in an email.

Trending strategy

Brukhman hasn’t been the only one to articulate the advantages of deep-pocketed investors putting resources into network health.

Multicoin Capital’s Tushar Jain wrote about some of the active network participation his fund has pursued, concluding:

“Just as a traditional VC firm would set aside capital for follow-on rounds, we believe that crypto investors who typically invest in protocols will find it’s a best practice to also set aside capital for supporting the network.”

Meanwhile, another Brooklyn-based fund, Notation Capital, admitted that the deeper it gets into this kind of work, the harder it is to understand how to optimize it, writing:

“We’re super excited to participate in these communities and learn from others, and to be frank, we still have more questions than answers. Should we be building more internally? Partnering? Outsourcing? It may be some combination of these strategies or something else entirely.”

Early entrants into the generalized mining space appear to be betting that a track record in aiding companies’ bootstrapping will pay off – in investor-speak – asymmetrically.

“As investors, we are looking to attract great teams seeking our network participation in their early stage projects,” CoinFund’s Walsh said. “We want teams to come to us because they know they will get measurable value from this relationship while bootstrapping their networks in early stages.”

Tractor in a field image via Shutterstock

Published at Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:10:52 +0000

Previous Article

Western Union Trials Ripple Technologies for Settlements Services Getting Ready for Crypto Surge

Next Article

Israeli NGO Threatens to Sue Coinbase for Enabling Hamas’ Bitcoin Donations

You might be interested in …

Rent control makes for good politics and bad economics

Rent Control Makes for Good Politics and Bad Economics

mises.org / Gary Galles / April 10, 2017

One needn’t read very much about public policy before coming across some statement to the effect that “bad economics makes good politics.” This statement is clearly untrue when good politics is defined as furthering mutually beneficial arrangements, as good economics is central to that task. But the statement is often true when good politics is defined as attracting 50%-plus-one votes on some issue or candidate, which is a much different standard, leaving plenty of room for government-imposed harms to be imposed on citizens.

Few issues reflect this divergence between “good” politics and bad economics more clearly than rent control. One of the most universally accepted propositions among economists is that rent control produces a host of adverse social consequences with its large involuntary redistribution of wealth and suppression of market prices as communicators of information and incentives. Despite that, it has been adopted as policy in many places and times — and now is a good time to revisit these issues, as efforts are currently underway in several states (including California, Oregon, Washington, and Illinois) to repeal existing statewide restrictions on rent control.

How Rent Control Destroys Value

Rent control takes a large portion of the value of residential properties from landlords. It does so by removing owners’ rights to accept offers willingly made by potential renters. And the value of the rights involved are large. For example, after Toronto imposed rent control in 1975, affected building values fell by 40% over five years, and a decade ago, such losses were estimated at $120 million annually in Santa Monica. A law like rent control, which can take half or more of each apartment’s value from the landlord, harms them just as much taking away half of their apart­ments, even though the latter is recognized as theft. Those stripped property values are given to current tenants, whose resulting bonanzas are shown by the fact that those under strict rent control almost never leave.

READ MORE

The post Rent Control Makes for Good Politics and Bad Economics appeared first on Silver For The People.