October 11, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Tether (USDT) Promotion, Bitcoin (BTC) Likely to Print Higher

Tether (usdt) promotion, bitcoin (btc) likely to print higher

Tether (USDT) Promotion, Bitcoin (BTC) Likely to Print Higher

Tether (usdt) promotion, bitcoin (btc) likely to print higher
  • bitcoin (BTC) in an uptrend but down 4.3 percent
  • Tether’s reserve low and the peg isn’t 1:1 against the USD

It is now emerging that USDT’s reserves don’t tally with what’s in circulation. That means Tether Limited is lying and investors may flock to safety driving Bitcoin prices up. At the moment, BTC is down 4.3 percent from last week’s close.

bitcoin Price Analysis

Fundamentals

Because of all the drama, investors are reluctant. However, that is not to say they are bearish. While there is a tinge of bearish sentiment, technical and other fundamental factors support Bitcoin bulls. Expanding that and realizing that Bitcoin has a positive correlation with the altcoin market, it is easy to conclude that the market, in general, is recovering.

If anything, a combination of fundamental reasons may spur the next wave of higher highs above important resistance lines. Presently, BitFinex and Tether may be a systemic risk or blessing. With the admission that Tether Limited has no reserves to back the stable coin 100 percent, investors may decide to liquidate their stable coin and convert them to Bitcoin, alternative currencies like PAX, or fiat en mass, heaping pressure on USDT but supporting BTC.

On the other hand, the market may collapse if the NY OAG decides to impose hefty fines on BitFinex for their fraudulent activities. Zoe Phillips, of law firm Morgan Lewis, delivered the bombshell saying collaborated by BitFinex counsel:

“Tether’s reserves of cash and cash equivalents alone (without the line of credit) would cover approximately 74 percent of the outstanding amount of tether.”

Candlestick Arrangement

At the time of press, Bitcoin (BTC) is dominant, controlling 54 percent of crypto trading. Nonetheless, it is stable, down 4.3 percent in the last week. Although we are bullish on the asset, it is imperative that bulls muster enough momentum to drive prices above $5,500, in a trend continuation phase.

That means reversing loses of Apr-25, ideally with high transaction volumes, and confirming buyers of Apr-2. By doing so, Bitcoin would be free from a temporary consolidation.

On the other hand, should there be lower lows countering yesterday’s upswings then it is likely that bears of Apr-25—which is wide-ranging with high participation levels—would drive prices below $4950 invalidating our short-term stance. As a result, it is Bitcoin (BTC) may drop to $4,500 in line with our last BTC/USD trade plan.

Technical Indicators

From above, Apr-25 with 18k against 10k volumes is our reference bar. The initial trend is bullish, but the bar is bearish with tepid bulls. Any drop below $4,950 or surge past $5,600 should be with high participation exceeding 18k of Apr-25 or 38k of Apr-2.

Chart courtesy of Trading View

Published at Wed, 01 May 2019 17:28:28 +0000

Previous Article

A New Report Shows People Are Warming Up to ₿itcoin

Next Article

ConsenSys Monthly Report — April 2019 – ConsenSys Media

You might be interested in …

Ethereum (eth) price looks set to break $175-$180

Ethereum (ETH) Price Looks Set To Break $175-$180

Ethereum (ETH) Price Looks Set To Break $175-$180 ETH price corrected lower and tested the $165-166 support area against the US Dollar. The price bounced back and recently broke the $169 and $170 resistance levels. […]

Why The Bitcoin Miners Are Destined To Lose The Hard Fork Wars

Excuse me for indulging myself, but there are many points of view towards what may be an impending hard fork for bitcoin. This may come across as a loosely coherent ramble, but at least it is short and sweet. There is enough here to put it on wax, so here’s what I see, in the big picture.


This is in response to the Medium post created by Peter Rizun yesterday, outlining how this hard fork may play out, and essentially showing a way BTU wins, in the long run. (Roger Ver tweeted his support for this post, so I read it and posted most of these thoughts in the comments section, and here we are.)

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

In my humble opinion, the problem I see coming is if BCU breaks off, it will become an altcoin, as has been established by the bitcoin exchange establishment. These miners can mine all the blocks they want, if the greater community doesn’t trust their developers, doesn’t want an altcoin, and isn’t buying BCU, it is irrelevant by design.

The market will decide who wins, and anybody who is not a miner wants to stick with Core and their chain. The miners are one thing, the market is something else. The miners might win a battle, but they would lose that war. They should keep that in mind.

Without those miners, BTC would definitely take a hit, but the Core developers could then quickly move to a 2MB upgrade and get SegWit and The Lightning Network approved, creating greater bitcoin functionality, from a trusted group of developers, and an incredible upside in off-chain scalability that an on-chain approach would be hard pressed to match. All without the centralization and control of the miners.

segwit-logo

Users will follow anyone who is going to implement SegWit. The market is sold on this concept as a boon to bitcoin functionality. BTU has not done a very good sales job at all regarding their position. Scaling away from miners will hurt mining, but it will let bitcoin reach its full potential.

BTU needs to sell their mined Bitcoins to a market. I’m not seeing much of a market for BTU, outside of the miners and BTU investors, themselves. The miners do not control bitcoin, and even Core does not control bitcoin. Maybe, just maybe, The People control bitcoin’s future growth? Anyone who thinks the market doesn’t have a handle on who each side is looking out for here is fooling themselves.

Just seeing how the community is responding, keeping my ear to the ground, the greater community will not follow the miners, who are primarily looking to turn a digital buck in bitcoin. They will follow Core, who is looking after the greater good. Miners will lose that tug of war.

Bitcoin miners vs Bitcoin core

It has become clear that BTU developers cannot replace BTC developers, as the recent bugs have shown the world, but BTC miners can be replaced. There are plenty of people around the world who want that job, and can do it just as well.

This power struggle is really temporary in nature. People will not follow miners looking for profit first, and who want to hijack the entire system, from now on, in order to get it. That is not leadership.

At the end of the day, The People will decide to back Core. The only question is when will the dissenting miners, clouded by visions of endless bitcoin profiteering, figure this fact out?

If the miners didn’t get the memo, that the vast majority of the market will stick with Core and not dump BTC for any BTU altcoin, use this. Like bitcoin itself, it’s far from perfect, but it’ll do just fine.

How do you think a hard fork would play out? Should there be an increase in block size? Let us know what you think below!


Images courtesy of bitcoin Core, AdobeStock

The post Why The Bitcoin Miners Are Destined To Lose The Hard Fork Wars appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.