November 2, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Tether and Bitfinex Ask New York Attorney General for Fund Accessibility

Tether and bitfinex ask new york attorney general for fund accessibility

Tether and Bitfinex Ask New York Attorney General for Fund Accessibility

Tether and bitfinex ask new york attorney general for fund accessibility

Attorneys for Tether and Bitfinex are hoping to get the former access to its reserves amid a legal dispute with New York Office of the Attorney General (NYOAG).

In a letter sent to the New York County Supreme Court, attorneys representing iFinex (the parent organization of Bitfinex) and Tether took issue with the restrictions that had been placed on Tether’s transactions with related parties as part of an ongoing case against them, stating that the NYOAG had no basis for disallowing tether (USDT) holders and other affiliated entities from redeeming their tokens.

The development brings yet another twist to the ongoing dispute between the parties. In April 2019, the NYOAG applied for a court order to investigate Bitfinex for “ongoing fraud” totaling $850 million, using funds from Tether to mask massive losses. As part of the case, the NYOAG had filed an injunction seeking a restriction on related parties from accessing any of their funds in Tether’s reserve for at least 90 days.

The NYOAG’s argument is simple; if Bitfinex is allowed to continue drawing funds from Tether, with no assurance of repayment, then there’s a significant possibility that these funds will never be recovered.

On the other hand, Bitfinex maintains that the NYOAG has no legal basis or authority to probe its business.

In this recent letter sent to the court, iFinex’s attorneys noted that the two sides have been unable to reach a consensus on what Tether should be allowed to do with its holdings. The respondents also expressed their concern that the injunction sought by the NYOAG could have significant effects on Tether’s operations and financial strength.

“While Tether does not anticipate that it will suddenly become unprofitable, OAG’s language would potentially require the company to cut off salary and other ordinary course payments in any given period if, for whatever reason, there was insufficient profit,” the document reads.

As a compromise, the respondents’ attorneys asked that the injunction be reduced to 45 days. They also want affiliated entities to have the ability to redeem their tokens within that period.

Published at Wed, 15 May 2019 15:51:55 +0000

Previous Article

Opera Browser Announces Collaboration with TRON

Next Article

Bitcoin [BTC]: US-China tensions fueled the cryptocurrency’s growth, says Tom Lee

You might be interested in …

Taiwan amends law to target anonymous cryptocurrency transactions

Taiwan Amends Law to Target Anonymous Cryptocurrency Transactions

Taiwan Amends Law to Target Anonymous Cryptocurrency Transactions Advertisement Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Taiwan’s highest legislature has approved amendments to existing laws, enabling the country’s regulator to combat anonymous cryptocurrency transactions. On Friday, Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan […]

Fake website scam targets aspiring telegram ico investors

Fake Website Scam Targets Aspiring Telegram ICO Investors

Fake Website Scam Targets Aspiring Telegram ICO Investors Amid a flurry of reports about messaging app Telegram’s multibillion-dollar initial coin offering (ICO), a newly-created website appears to be attempting to ensnare would-be investors. The website, […]

Sia - elastic heart (live on snl)

Sia – Elastic Heart (Live on SNL)

Sia – Elastic Heart (Live on SNL) Playlist Best of Sia https://goo.gl/99ubCj Subscribe for more https://goo.gl/UA7cug Music video by Sia performing Elastic Heart (Live on SNL). (C) 2015 Monkey Puzzle Records, under exclusive license to […]