Taiwanese Chip Manufacturing Giant Blames Revenue Losses On ‘Crypto Winter’

Taiwanese chip manufacturer United Microelectronics Corporation saw a roughly 10% decrease in revenue in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Like TSMC, who provide chips to Bitmain, they prominently attribute some of their losses to the downturn in demand for cryptocurrency. Less demand amounts to less need for mining, which subsequently lessens the demand for mining hardware.

Co-president Jason Wang said:

Looking into the first quarter of 2019, we anticipate further deceleration in customers’ wafer demand, due to a softer than expected outlook in entry-level and mid-end smartphones as well as falling crypto currency valuations. Although UMC’s ongoing transformation will need time to reach its full synergy and potential, our progress so far has enabled the company to better endure these current headwinds.

Mining Isn’t Everything

Demand from ₿itcoin mining was certainly heavy throughout 2017. But chip makers have long supplied Bitmain and other mining equipment manufacturers. The continual mention of the “crypto winter” in loss reports by electronics companies seems a cop-out. “Crypto Winter” has had a far great impact on traders and retail investors than it ever could on miners.

Miners, after all, determine the daily price by and large. It is their willingness to accept a given price for newly minted coins that plays a crucial role in bear markets.

When markets take off and wildly divorce from the actual cost of mining crypto tokens, miners benefit. Conversely, they are able to tune their operations to profit even when prices drop wildly. One thing that is certain is that difficulty for ₿itcoin continued to rise throughout 2018, meaning that more miners were being added to the market.

It’s unclear whether Bitmain has a relationship with UMC or not. They likely provide chips to other manufacturers.

Demand from mining equipment makers can be high when mining equipment demand gets higher. But the majority of chip business falls in other industries such as mobile phones and computers.

One thing that is not given enough credit for the drop in revenue is a stagnating demand for new cell phones. In 2017, while crypto mining demand drove up the profits of chip makers, new smartphone shipments increased less than 2%. There are more smartphones than anything out there these days, and a declining demand for them surely has a greater impact on the need for chips than does a decline in crypto mining.

Why Not Blame Peak Smartphone?

The onus is more on cell phone makers than cryptocurrency mining companies, in short. They should probably explore developing new markets in places which were previously under-connected. Developing nations have a great appetite for inexpensive technology. If we’ve reached peak smartphone, perhaps it’s time Samsung, Apple, and the others stop finding new ways to create a $1000 unit. Instead, they should explore the development of an ultra-modern $100 (or less) unit.

In any case, it’s getting tiresome, everyone blaming the “crypto winter” for stagnating businesses. Computer chips are in virtually everything, and without regard to crypto mining demand, $35 billion in revenues for a quarter is nothing to spit at. True demand for cryptocurrency will exist once tokenized projects begin to cross into the mainstream. In the meantime, speculative bubbles will come and go.

Published at Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:12:23 +0000

July 17, 2017

Counterparty Has Reached Its Millionth Transaction

On Thursday, the smart contract protocol Counterparty reached its millionth transaction. bitcoin Magazine received an update on the status of the project from Shawn Leary, the newly elected Counterparty community director.

Counterparty was launched in January 2014 with the creation of its native currency, XCP. Unlike typical ICOs (initial coin offerings) today that transfer funds to the founders, XCP was created by “burning” bitcoins, whereby bitcoins were sent to a special address (one for which no one owned the private key) that rendered them unspendable. Those who destroyed their bitcoins in this manner in return received an amount of XCP in proportion to their bitcoins lost.

This “proof of burn” process put all bitcoin users, including the founders, on an equal footing in terms of obtaining the native XCP token. According to Leary, the Counterparty team hopes that its unique founding sets the tone to attract new projects that won’t take advantage of users’ funds.

“We want to continue this legacy and hope it wards off scams and attracts genuine projects that use our protocol for what it was intended: decentralized markets,” said Leary.

Counterparty doesn’t have its own blockchain; rather, it exists entirely via the bitcoin blockchain. All actions taken on Counterparty are made through ordinary bitcoin transactions using XCP as the “fuel” that is spent. This means that Counterparty transactions are protected by the hashing power of bitcoin, so a double spend would require a 51 percent attack on the bitcoin blockchain itself.

Counterparty Project: More Than Games

Leary described an indie-game network that is “growing leaps and bounds around Counterparty.” This market is arguably where Counterparty has had its greatest impact. The first of these games to rise to prominence was Spells of Genesis, with its token launch in 2015.

Since then, many gaming projects have flourished on Counterparty. The Rare Pepe project currently has over 1,000 digital collectible trading cards registered via Counterparty for use in games such as SaruTobi Island and Rare Pepe Party. The augmented reality game Augmentors has also successfully raised over $1,000,000 in bitcoins in a token sale on Counterparty of the in-game asset Databits, and even won investor Vinny Lingham’s support during an episode of Shark Tank. Augmentors is currently in beta and is planning for a launch in 2018.

But there is more to Counterparty than just games. Generally, Counterparty is helping anyone create digital assets with smart contract properties that are protected by the hashing power of the bitcoin blockchain.

For instance, Counterparty’s FoldingCoin is aimed at rewarding those who provide computing power to Stanford’s Folding@home project to aid in the study of diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, Parkinson’s and many cancers.

In collaboration with Storj, Counterparty developed Pico payments, which will be implemented to reduce the cost of microtransactions.

Probably their most widely used token, LTBCOIN, has been used by the LTB Network for a few years now. In fact, over 17 percent of all Counterparty transactions have been with LTBCOIN.

“Every protocol has its deficiencies and quirks,” Adam B. Levine, Editor-in-Chief of the Let’s Talk bitcoin! Show, said to bitcoin Magazine. “Counterparty is no different. What I like about it is that we’ve been building with it long enough that I understand those risks and challenges. We’ve already solved most of them, like accepting dollar payments for tokens and giving token buyers the feeling of instant fulfillment when they’d otherwise be waiting for blockchain confirmations.”

The Scaling Debate: Preparing for What’s Next

The Counterparty team has not taken a definitive position on the various scaling proposals, but continues to run bitcoin Core. Leary told bitcoin Magazine that there are two routes Counterparty could take to account for a network fork. If Counterparty supports a hard fork in advance, they will “release a new version of Counterparty utilizing the new bitcoin client, and users must switch to this new bitcoin client as well as the updated Counterparty version before the specific bitcoin fork occurs.”

Alternatively, if a fork occurs that they did not account for ahead of time, they have the option to “freeze” Counterparty balances at a specific block height on the old chain and transition to a new chain at an indicated block height. In this case, “there would be some downtime, but the process would be announced well in advance with clear instructions provided for everyone.”

The team also emphasized that since Counterparty exists entirely through the bitcoin blockchain, there can be no such thing as a fork in Counterparty itself. Counterparty nodes do not need to coordinate with one another, since all nodes simply need to monitor the canonical bitcoin blockchain, whatever the Counterparty protocol defines that to be.

Continuing Improvements

Counterparty is still continually improved with development led by core maintainers Ruben de Vries and Devon Weller. There are currently two Counterparty Improvement Proposals (CIPs) outstanding, CIP 9 and CIP 10. Both are aimed at reducing costs for transactions over the network. The team is also raising funds to upgrade counterwallet.io.

Editor’s Note: The LTB Network is a property of BTC Media.

The post Counterparty Has Reached Its Millionth Transaction appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.