October 12, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Stellar [XLM] First to Lead the Potential Recovery Despite Tankish Fork

Ethereum World News
Stellar [XLM] First to Lead the Potential Recovery Despite Tankish Fork
Xlm/usd

Delivering a blockchain solution for transfers, Stellar Lumens offers the opportunity of making cross-border transactions at very low cost but very speedy. That is their ideal goal, to make everything easier for the user. Thousands of transactions are dealt within a second, while in average one takes 3 sec to be cleared.

One of the best runners, when it comes to tech-expansion and testing, is without doubt Ripple as it is taking center stage on a daily basis with news and announcements. On a very similar path, Stellar Lumens is, keeping in mind it forked from Ripple in 2014, running the same path.

Both currencies are all about international payments, meaning that they deliver solutions on how to do transactions and transfers faster and cheaper but not lets say being a retail currency to make everyday purchases.

Trading future

Source: coinmarketcap

With all the digital currency assets taking a critical hit for the past few days after not being able to overcome major levels [example BTC $10,000], the sellers are having their saying. However, out of the leading coins by market capitalization, only Stellar Lumens has made it to the green gaining zone with 4.29% increase in the last 24-hours [as seen on the chart daily chart above] reaching the level of $0.3327 again. The $0.3000 support has been saving the day many times for the pair XLM/USD.

Stellar technology

OKEx exchange in Hong Kong has just recently listed Stellar under trading pairs. The exchanging platform is under the largest [5th] by volume. OKEx indicated that they would be listing Stellar on December 28th, 2017.

Following up the partnership signing between Stellar and IBM, the tech giant was able to showcase cross-border transfers featuring unique currencies of South Pacific countries by developing a platform supported by Stellar and the use of XLM.

Stellar hodlers hope the weekend will herald new positivity after a torrid run in the last 7 days was compounded by Kik’s decision to abandon its initial plans to use Stellar’s platform for its Kin token.

The fork in Stellar has been one of the main factors causing the decline. Netanel Lev, the Vice President of Research and Development at the Kin Ecosystem Foundation, said that Kin needs to be scaled as Stellar suffers business scale issues.

“Most crypto projects to date have been technology-driven first and product-driven second. Kin has always been the opposite. After working heads down alongside the best minds in the industry we came to the conclusion that a hybrid solution of Ethereum and our own fork of Stellar would benefit the Kin Ecosystem both short and long-term.”

The post Stellar [XLM] First to Lead the Potential Recovery Despite Tankish Fork appeared first on Ethereum World News.

Previous Article

How Japan Is Creating a Template for Cryptocurrency Regulation

Next Article

Case Study: The Slow But Inevitable Conversion Of Bitcoin Skeptics h/t @tanzeel_akhtar #Crypto #Cryptocurrency #BTC #BTCUSD #Bitcoin #Altcoins #Buffett #NewSchoolvsOldSchool https://t.co/iweUE0AyqM https://t.co/1cbM3FdZbv

You might be interested in …

Morgan Stanley Analyst: True Price of Bitcoin Could Be Zero

In a recent report sent out to clients, Morgan Stanley analyst James Faucette cautioned that the “true” value of bitcoin might actually be zero.


Zero. Zip. Nada.

The report, titled bitcoin Decrypted, discussed the difficulty in ascribing value to the digital currency, noting that it behaves like neither a currency nor a store-of-value commodity like gold, silver, etc… Examining several key factors, Faucette points out:

  • bitcoin can’t be valued as a currency because it has no associated interest rate;
  • It may be likened to digital gold but, unlike gold itself, which is used in electronics, jewelry, etc.., bitcoin has no inherent use*;
  • While it is technically a payment network, bitcoin is difficult to scale and charges no transaction fee*;
  • bitcoin’s average daily trade volume over the last 30 days is only $3 billion* compared to $5.4 trillion in the FX market;
  • The estimated daily purchase volume for bitcoin is less than $300 million compared to Visa’s $17 billion

Bitcoin acceptance among Top 500 eCommerce Retailers

All of these facts, according to Faucette, underscore the fact that the digital currency has “virtually no acceptance, and shrinking.” In fact, he provides a handy chart (above) to illustrate his statement. Because of this, he maintains that “If nobody accepts the technology for payment then the value would be 0.”

Hold On There, Speed…

I hate to burst your bubble, Mr. Faucette, but some of your facts are…shall we say…less than factual. Mind you, I am no financial analyst, but then you don’t need to be to pick out these errors.

FACT 1 – bitcoin has no inherent use

This one is a little tricky to refute, but I’ll give it a go. Playing devil’s advocate, let’s say that bitcoin as a cryptocurrency has no inherent use. It’s underlying architecture, the blockchain, has a wide range of applications. I know…”But blockchain and bitcoin are two separate things…” True, but without the blockchain, we wouldn’t have bitcoin to begin with, so one could conceivably argue that – in this instance – they are two sides of the same coin.

bitcoin has other uses too – especially in a socioeconomic sense. Consider the current economic conditions in Venezuela and Zimbabwe. These people have been utterly failed by their respective governments. Inflation is through the roof, their native currency has about as much value as one-ply toilet paper, and people – families – are starving. So where are they turning? bitcoin. People are mining bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies so that they can survive. That’s pretty useful if you ask me.

Starving Venezuelans Turn to Bitcoin Mining in Desperation

FACT 2 – bitcoin charges no transaction fee

Um…hello? There is absolutely a transaction fee, and right now, we’re paying it out the wazoo. It’s part of those “scalability issues” you mention in your research report. Now, if by transaction fee, you mean a centralized service provider collecting a fee that goes into its own coffers, then I guess maybe you’re technically correct, but you’ve still missed the point. Kind of like tech support at a software company whose name will not be mentioned here.

FACT 3 – bitcoin’s average trade volume over the last 30 days is only $3 billion

What rock have you been living under? Go look at the historical data for the last 30 days on CoinMarketCap. It’s okay. I’ll wait. Second column from the right. The one labeled Volume. If you take the average of all 30 days, as of this writing, it works out to $11.8 billion – just a wee bit more than your $3 billion estimate.

Bitcoin average 24hr trade volume

I respect your experience and your financial acumen, Mr. Faucette, and it even looks like we both believe in the same old adage, “Forewarned is forearmed,” but if you’re arming your clients with inaccurate information, what purpose does it serve?

What do you think of Faucette’s claims? Could the true value of bitcoin actually be zero or is this just more wharrgarbl? Let us know in the comments below.


Images courtesy of Morgan Stanley, Reuters

The post Morgan Stanley Analyst: True Price of Bitcoin Could Be Zero appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.