March 11, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

St Louis Fed Explains Why Crypto $BTC Price ‘Not Likely to Fall to Zero’

St louis fed explains why crypto $btc price ‘not likely to fall to zero’

St Louis Fed Explains Why Crypto $BTC Price ‘Not Likely to Fall to Zero’

St louis fed explains why crypto $btc price ‘not likely to fall to zero’

The Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis has published an examination of the long-term prospects for bitcoin price. It considers both the bullish and bearish cases of ‘moon’ and ‘doom’, and unsurprisingly comes down somewhere between the two.


The Bear Necessities

The naysayers believe that the price of bitcoin 00 will ultimately fall to zero. They argue that with nothing backing the currency, it is fundamentally without value. For them, it is just a case of waiting until the market realizes this.

The St Louis Fed, however, argues that an asset can clearly trade above its fundamental value, without that value ever being zero. Both gold and the US Dollar, for example, trade at above their fundamental value, for industrial applications or discharging tax obligations.

These assets trade at a premium to reflect their value as exchange media, but even without this premium, their value would not be zero.

Federal reserve: 2018 crypto $btc price drop tied to launch of futures market

The report suggests that Crypto $BTC is essentially a database management system, offering money storage and transfer. The fundamental value comes from its properties of being permissionless and decentralized, which gives it demand. It is the removal of these two properties which causes the lack of demand for a ‘FedCoin’.

As long as there are people who value these features then the lower boundary on price will always be above zero. And as long as Crypto $BTC exists and has a non-zero value, other people are free to also use it. This is similar in concept to Nassim Taleb’s “dominance of the stubborn minority.”

The St Louis Fed concludes:

The fundamental demand for Crypto $BTC derives from the fact that there are at least some people who value [decentralization and permissionlessness] features. This fundamental demand provides a non-zero lower bound on the price of Crypto $BTC.

Increasing Altcoins Could Dilute Crypto $BTC’s Value

The long term bullish case for Crypto $BTC revolves around ever-increasing price due to limited supply and growing demand.

The problem with this, says the report, is that we must also consider altcoins, which are essentially unlimited. For a bullish outcome, Crypto $BTC should appreciate relative to other cryptocurrencies, so that its share of the crypto market cap remains roughly constant.

The St Louis Fed gives an example considering $5 and $10 bills, whereby an increase in supply of one decreases the value of both. But these bills have a fixed rate of exchange, which is not true for different cryptocurrencies.

So this potential issue arises if investors mentally group cryptocurrencies together, in which case the increasing supply of altcoins could depress prices across the entire market.

The report concludes by saying that:

economic theory predicts that the price dynamic of an unbacked asset is likely to be highly volatile and inherently unforecastable

Although the price of bitcoin is unlikely to fall to zero while there are people who desire its qualities as a money storage and transfer system, it could face continuing downward pressure from an increasing supply of altcoins.

Do you agree with the St Louis Federal Reserve? Can Crypto $BTC’s value ever go to zero? Share your thoughts below!


Images courtesy of Shutterstock

The post St Louis Fed Explains Why Crypto $BTC Price ‘Not Likely to Fall to Zero’ appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.

source: https://bitcoinist.com/federal-reserve-st-louis-bitcoin-price/

Published at Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:00:42 +0000

Previous Article

St Louis Fed Explains Why BTC Price ‘Not Likely to Fall to Zero’

Next Article

Bitcoin [BTC] Technical Analysis: Coin bleeds as vultures lurk around

You might be interested in …

Bittokens $bxt gains 402% during the past 24 hours

BitTokens $BXT Gains 402% During the Past 24 Hours

BitTokens $BXT Gains 402% During the Past 24 Hours Crypto currency BitTokens has risen 402% over the last 24 hours. BitTokens is trading at 0.0002593 Bitcoins or about 25,930 Pandacoins. BitTokens is a cryptocurrency that […]

Toqqn – Александр Снигирёв –

Toqqn – Александр Снигирёв – Phasen des Projekts Phase I: Die erste Version der Plattform wird mit herkömmlicher Webentwicklungstechnologie erstellt. Benutzer können an der sozialen Plattform teilnehmen und Krypto als Belohnung verdienen. Das Team wird an […]

Jim Rickards: Debt, The Death of Money and Gold

wallstreetexaminer.com / by Craig Wilson via The Daily Reckoning / April 3, 2017

Jim Rickards joined Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog to discuss his book The Death of Money and the debt ceiling issues facing Trump and Congress. During the interview the two discuss everything from what to expect from Federal Reserve policy to gold prices in the coming months and years.

To start out the interview Jim Rickards was asked on the national debt where he contends, “The debt ceiling is very important. The United States runs budget deficits year after year. In the last 50 years we have only had minimal surplus years under Nixon and Clinton. We currently have $20 trillion of debt. The Treasury cannot just borrow however much they want. The U.S Congress limits the Department of the Treasury’s ability to borrow, what is called the debt ceiling. When the Treasury wants to borrow more, you have to raise the ceiling ceiling by the legislative process – an act of Congress.”

“Officially the existing debt ceiling ran out on March 15 and the Treasury cannot borrow any more money. Right now the Treasury is within tax season so it has positive cash flow. They have more in than going out and will not need to borrow at the exact moment. That is strictly temporary and a function of tax season in. Once we get through April, the shoe is on the other foot.”

“They’re going to hit a “hard ceiling” probably by August, if not sooner. Then the issue becomes whether Congress gives the Treasury the authority to borrow more money. The problem is when passing a debt ceiling bill, the “strings attached” deals that come with them. You gain some members in doing deals and lose others. We saw that with the health fiasco and the repeal of Obamacare failed not because of Democrats but because of Republicans who could not agree amongst themselves.”

READ MORE

The post Jim Rickards: Debt, The Death of Money and Gold appeared first on Silver For The People.