October 29, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

SEC Chair Jay Clayton’s Mass Crackdown On Crypto Industry Roil GOP Lawmakers

Sec chair jay clayton’s mass crackdown on crypto industry roil gop lawmakers

SEC Chair Jay Clayton’s Mass Crackdown On Crypto Industry Roil GOP Lawmakers


Sec chair jay clayton’s mass crackdown on crypto industry roil gop lawmakers
Advertisement

Jay Clayton, the chairman of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, is coming under fire from Republican lawmakers amid growing concerns over his harsh approach to regulatory enforcement — which critics claim strangles the free market and inhibits technological innovation.

In 2018, the SEC launched a massive crackdown on the crypto industry, which has been roiled by high-profile ICO scams and suspicions of market manipulation.

Clayton was appointed SEC chair in 2017 by President Trump, with a mandate to enforce securities laws while ensuring that regulations are pro-business and promote the free market.

But critics say Clayton lacks the “vision of market-driven change” that Republicans had hoped for on issues relating to cryptocurrencies and emerging technologies, Reuters reported.

As a result, some lawmakers and lobbyists say the US crypto industry has been stalled in its progress toward mainstream adoption and its bid to become a preeminent market leader.

‘Clayton Lives In an Ivory Tower’

“Jay Clayton has shown the industry that he lives in an ivory tower with his resistance to approve registration statements for token offerings,” said Anthony Tu-Sekine, head of the bitcoin and crypto group at law firm Seward & Kissel. “It is frustrating.”

One lobbyist said he doesn’t understand why the pro-business Trump Administration hired Clayton, whom they feel has adopted a draconian approach to regulation.

How did we end up with this guy? We can’t get anything out of him.

Sec chair jay clayton
Jay Clayton says he won’t support a bitcoin ETF until there is regulatory clarity. (YouTube)

In August 2018, the SEC rejected 9 bitcoin ETF applications, citing the applicants’ failure to demonstrate how they could prevent fraud and market manipulation, as CCN reported.

Diego Zuluaga, a policy analyst at the libertarian Cato Institute, called the rejection “most disappointing.”

In March 2017 and again in June 2018, the SEC rejected the bitcoin ETF (exchange-traded fund) applications submitted by the Winklevoss twins, Tyler and Cameron.

And two weeks ago, the SEC once again delayed making a decision on VanEck’s bitcoin ETF application until February 27, 2019. It was the second or third such postponement this year.

Clayton: Strict Enforcement Helps Industry

In February 2018, Clayton signaled that his agency would investigate cryptocurrencies when he testified before the US Senate Banking Committee. At the time, he said: “I believe every ICO I’ve seen is a security.”

Weeks later, the SEC targeted ICOs by issuing “dozens of subpoenas” to crypto-related tech companies and advisors to investigate how ICOs are structured.

The SEC’s rampant crackdowns on the virtual currency market has led many in the community to conclude that Clayton is anti-crypto. But he insisted that he’s not.

In April 2018, Clayton said increased regulatory scrutiny will benefit the industry by ridding it of scam artists who give the entire space a bad name.

He also said driving out bad actors early will ensure that the government won’t adopt such a hard-line stance that it will choke off the nascent industry, Clayton reasoned.

If we don’t stop the fraudsters, there is a serious risk that the regulatory pendulum – the regulatory actions – will be so severe that they will restrict the capacity of this new security.

Other Republicans approve of Clayton’s measured approach to the crypto industry, saying they expect the SEC to offer greater regulatory clarity in 2019.

“A lot of people would like things to move more quickly, but that’s the system,” said Paul Atkins, a former Republican SEC commissioner. “In the new year, you’ll see a lot of these seeds [Clayton has] planted will start to germinate.”

Meanwhile, US lawmakers have already proposed legislation designed to prevent price manipulation and position the United States as a leader in the crypto industry.

Featured image from Shutterstock.

Get Exclusive Crypto Analysis by Professional Traders and Investors on Hacked.com. Sign up now and get the first month for free. Click here.

Advertisement

Published at Thu, 20 Dec 2018 20:01:51 +0000

Previous Article

Daily Byte: Thursday, December 20, 2018

Next Article

Take your Bitcoin christmas gift now – short it

You might be interested in …

Trustlessness in Action: Particl's Model

Particl Thumb 5

“Trustlessness” is a term often
quoted as a feature of blockchain technology but what does that mean and is absolute
zero trust a myth or really true? Praised as one of the characteristics that
make the blockchain so revolutionary, a trustless system is one where two peers
can enter a virtual hand shake agreement, i.e.  smart contract, without relying on a
trusted third party to facilitate.

 

Blockchains are good at being
permissionless and having decentralized tasks that are recorded on an auditable
ledger, yet not all blockchains are completely trustless, and achieving full
trustlessness is challenging if not impossible.
Even
an open-source project like bitcoin that is constantly being reviewed can have
trust issues, not from the code but by the developers and reviewers of the
code. So trustlessness is more of a term describing an ideal state on the
blockchain where code is law with the caveat that humans write code and to err
is human.

 

Before looking at how a fully
trustless blockchain can be implemented by privacy advocates like Particl — an open-source project that is building
a decentralized ecommerce application on the blockchain — let’s look at the
obstacles standing in the way.

 

I Trust
You, Until I Don’t

 

We’re conditioned to think of
trust as a good thing. Traditionally, positive human relationships have
required a level of trust.
From an economic perspective, however, trust has significant
downsides.

 

The greatest drawback is that trust
can be broken. When you engage in a transaction with someone you believe to be
trustworthy, but then they fail to deliver the promised goods or services, you
suffer.
In
addition, trust is not efficient. It has to be cultivated and you have to
invest time in evaluating how much another party can be trusted before you
engage in a trade.

 

Blockchain technology can be
leveraged to overcome the risks and inefficiencies that are associated with
trust.
With
the right approach, it’s possible to make reliable transactions on the
blockchain without knowing or trusting the person or group you are dealing with.
That is because the blockchain can be used to enforce good behavior.

 

In Particl’s case, by creating
a simple smart contract, you can ensure that if one party in a transaction
fails to uphold their end of a deal, the blockchain can automatically cancel
the transaction or punish the misbehaving party in another way. In effect, this
feature makes it impossible for a malicious user to profit by taking advantage
of the trust that another user places in them without inflicting harm on
themselves as well.

 

The
Trustless Challenge

 

If you buy or sell something
using bitcoin, you don’t automatically gain protection against being cheated: default
bitcoin transactions are non-reversible. The ability of the blockchain to
enable transactions that are both trustless and reliable is difficult because
it needs to be done without the intervention of a third party. In conventional
trading contexts, transactions are typically policed by a central authority that
evaluates claims about broken trust and responds accordingly. For example, if a
seller cheats you on eBay, you can complain to eBay and request a refund. These
authorities also charge fees or percentages of sales revenue whether they are
used or not.

 

The downside to this approach
is that it compromises privacy. In order to provide this protection against
broken trust, a platform like eBay oversees transactions. It knows what buyers
and sellers are doing.
With a two-person trustless escrow, in contrast, reliable
transactions can be implemented without the oversight of a third party. You
don’t have to lose privacy to gain reliability.

 

The tricky thing about
achieving true trustlessness on a privacy-focused blockchain is that it doesn’t
happen by default. Although multiple times more efficient than building trust
in public, smart contracts still need to be signed and the exchange of goods or
services still needs to happen. The beauty is that an agreement can be made and
successfully carried out even if one or both parties don’t fully trust each
other.

 

A Trustless
Solution

 

Particl leverages bitcoin as
the underlying blockchain protocol, but adds privacy enhancements that make it
possible for users to perform transactions that are trustless, reliable and
private. In an innovative development, PART transactions do not require users
to write smart contracts themselves. Instead, this feature is built into the
platform.

 

Central to Particl’s approach
to trustless transactions is mutually assured destruction (MAD) escrow. MAD
escrow
is a special type of smart contract that prevents either party from
profiting in the event that one cheats during a transaction.

 

In addition, because the smart
contract is enforced automatically via the blockchain, Particl developers play
no role in overseeing transactions. Their platform guarantees privacy while
achieving trustlessness at the same time. Two people from anywhere in the world
can enter into a binding agreement that is only finalized when both agree it is
completed.

 

Blockchain technology’s promise
is that users are no longer bound by the inefficiencies and risks associated
with trust in order to make transactions. Most blockchains, however, do not yet
implement truly trustless transactions. Particl is an exception, as it was developed
with trustlessness at its core from the start. Particl developers aim to “square
the circle” by delivering trustless ecommerce without compromising reliability
or privacy.

The post Trustlessness in Action: Particl's Model appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.