July 12, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Re: YO-EX Signature Campaign [Pay Per Post]{PAUSED}

Re: yo-ex signature campaign [pay per post]{paused}

Re: YO-EX Signature Campaign [Pay Per Post]

This isnt a case of they dont want to spend the money or anything like that. He wants to keep the campaign going but i do not operate without the funds in most cases. Its better for me to pause the campaign til funds are secured and restart it anew vs you guys waiting 1 week 2 weeks or who knows how long.

Then theres the possibility they never refill the address, if i decided not to pause the campaign then alot of you would feel like i owed you or you deserved to be paid for your posts. Obviously i would agree your owed for your posts, but i dont want to be put in that position.

We understand the situation and will nor can we ever blame you for unwanted situations. There will be members like me who did not change the signature or opted out from the campaign, these members should get auto enrolled if the campaign resumes (instead of applying again) and their post counts should be counted starting from the last count.

I agree that Yahoo has done the right thing and paused the campaign but I dont agree that
people who didnt change their signature should get automatic enrolment over people who did.

The signature campaigns are a reward based scheme. Lets say Poloniex came on the forum or
a campaign manager for Poloniex came here and asked people to advertise their company for FREE
I doubt there would be any takers!

The develope for Yo-Ex at the moment is getting free advertising from people like yourself who while
the campaign is paused [i.e no rewards] is still advertising……. why would they refill yahoo’s fund address?

(Why?)

Published at Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:06:25 +0000

[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]_MG_7037
The Peace Plus One – World Sustainability Project www.WorldSustainability.Org is interested in the opportunities afforded to young people in the new economy of Caring Currency. The currency of the 99%.

The concept of Caring Currency www.CaringCurrency.com is to move from the selfish GREED IS GOOD model of the 1% to a more equitable, distributed wealth model based on the GOOD we individually do for Society, the Environment and the Economy.

bitcoin is one of the early contenders for alternative currency, and an excellent experiment in "alternative worlds" like the www.RepublicOfConscience.com , where we ask visitors and new citizens to essentially stay where we are physically, and simply change our perspective to see the beauty and opportunity in the world.

The Be, Buy Boost bitcoin program is a complimentary program in the physical world… to develop the acceptance, adoption, infrastructure and economic ecosystem.. An Alternative Currencies development program to increase the adoption of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in everyday transactions.

The PPO-WSP believes this is a critical effort that must be ramped up immediately to avoid alternative currencies just becoming a speculative bubble like tulilps.

Please join us every Wednesday for "3 Finger Wednesday" www.WeChat3.com
By Philip McMaster PeacePlusOne_!/ on 2013-12-04 12:49:03
Tags

Previous Article

patti smith bookfair 81.JPG

Next Article

Re: NobleCoin[NOBL] – 8% PoS | 1Yr+ | MARKETPLACE | PAY | GIFT | CHARITIES/MERCHANTS

You might be interested in …

‘Borderline Fraud’ Bitcoin Cash Is ‘Less Secure’ – Max Keiser To CNBC

Keiser Report host and bitcoin proponent Max Keiser has told CNBC bitcoin Cash is “by definition less secure than bitcoin.”


Keiser Left Unimpressed At Ver’s CNBC Stunt

In a Twitter exchange following the appearance of bitcoin Cash’s Roger Ver on the network’s Fast Money segment, Keiser argued the bitcoin fork “eschews decentralization,” which is a “cornerstone” of bitcoin.

“Bottom Line: BitcoinCash (sic) is, by definition, less secure than bitcoin as it eschews decentralization; the cornerstone of TRUE bitcoin intent and design,” he wrote.

Additionally, use of the ‘bitcoin’ name in this instance is deceitful and borders on outright fraud.

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

The comments came in response to CNBC its joining in the debate, questioning why both bitcoin and bitcoin Cash could not coexist simultaneously.

“Do they have to be mutually exclusive? Can’t they both be good? So much division in this world,” it wrote, describing the two chains’ opposition as “sad.”

‘Promoting A Scam’?

Ver continues to enjoy widespread publicity as a bitcoin commentator despite his recent switch to bitcoin Cash and public denouncing of the original bitcoin as a “cripple coin.”

Some of his comments have been especially contentious, these notably including criticism of speaker and educator Andreas Antonopoulos’ net worth in bitcoin.

Commenting on CNBC’s choice of guest meanwhile, Keiser said the network was not guilty of “promoting a scam” referring to Cash.

“Is CNBC culpable in promoting a scam? No, because they make no claims about veracity and integrity. The market is an amusing cockfight they cover – without journalistic standards – for bored hedge fund managers,” he retaliated, suggesting viewers instead watch his own Keiser Report for “informed bitcoin analysis.”

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

bitcoin Cash continues to post relatively flat growth in the face of bitcoin’s rapid ascent to $17,000. Nonetheless, the project has a huge marketing presence on social media, with dedicated advocates appearing to infiltrate almost any discussion bringing up aspects of bitcoin’s current status.

What do you think about Max Keiser’s comments on bitcoin Cash? Let us know in the comments section below!


Images courtesy of Wikimedia commons, Twitter

The post ‘Borderline Fraud’ Bitcoin Cash Is ‘Less Secure’ – Max Keiser To CNBC appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.