And that’s because I think it is unlikely the scaling problem won’t be addressed. The situation is already heated enough as to assume it will be addressed before end of year. If it wasn’t then we would have a real problem.
or you could look at it the other way and perceive that a fork back down is an endorsement for core to carry on as they are. they can point to their solution and say the only thing holding it back is miners. those miners will also know that forcing through a fork ain’t gonna go down well.
more deadlock. i really hope not though.
I am speculating on miners finally coming back to their senses and start signaling for segwit activation. The ball is now on Jihan BU’s court.
That wont happen unless core capitulate on scale. Core wont capitulate ( they are in slash and burn mode now) Their future depends on fee market and LN ( which is still miles off) They might as well fight on or burn bitcoin.
I suspect they may fail at both.
There is no reason for Core to capitulate on anything.
Why would you want to compromise and incorporate some kind of code that absolutely unnecessary?
It’s not about being biased or financially dependent on lightning network – that’s all bullshit. The main point is that there is no facts or logic to back up making an increase in the blocksize limit at this time.
Published at Fri, 24 Mar 2017 01:06:24 +0000
[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]{flickr|100|campaign}
