Im converting fiat into btc to get prepared for btc-e and bitfinex addition. Once its there u can set ur selling target to 0.02 btc and safely log off from the exchange. Get back in three months and see ur investment soaring above satellites. Someone has to get in contact with eastern exchanges too, btcchina and huobi will be happy to adopt jefferson coin though they may have a limited understanding of who he was.
Hero Member Offline
Posts: 1491995160
1491995160
1491995160
Hero Member Offline
Posts: 1491995160
1491995160
1491995160
lendingINVEST TODAY
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
I’ve seen this kind of overwhelming supply & premine before. And their fate turned out to be not nice. So I’ll just leave this one to others.
No wonder some are already cashing out what they have for this one. This will easily go down to nothing. Hope I’m wrong.
Full Member Offline
Activity: 162
April 10, 2017, 08:48:49 AM
Good volume on Nova, we need now Yobit
1eNUWHJiJ6CFAk8SdjKonhErmuCqf82FR
Sr. Member Offline
Activity: 452
April 10, 2017, 11:20:44 AM
Good volume on Nova, we need now Yobit
Nova? Where???
Sr. Member Offline
Activity: 448
April 10, 2017, 01:34:29 PM
I took a breath of gasoline perspiration and changed my mind, now Im opposed to everything related to thomas jefferson. Hope this thread will die a natural death and nobody will ever find jefferson in a year from now. The door is being open for my favorite mover cellulite coin. I put half of my portfolio into it and thinking of adding more longs at lows when it dips a bit.
Hero Member Offline
Activity: 682
NO tech/coding:)novaStaff employee &Mooncoin Rocks
April 10, 2017, 02:23:47 PM
Welcome ThomasJeffersoncoin
Work on getting the project listed on Coinmarketcap and coinhills
Espers & TrollPayment, plus 75+ coins Traded @ [/url]Novaexchange.com
Sr. Member Offline
Activity: 452
April 10, 2017, 05:27:31 PM
Welcome ThomasJeffersoncoin
Ahhhh, thanks…
Legendary Offline
Activity: 859
April 10, 2017, 09:18:52 PM
Yobit next?
Member Offline
Activity: 110
April 11, 2017, 04:02:52 PM
Nice premine
yes, nice
Sr. Member Offline
Activity: 452
April 11, 2017, 06:10:48 PM
Nice premine
yes, nice
Same range than Wash, Jobs and other personality X11 coins lately if I remember well…
Salute
Hero Member Offline
Activity: 658
April 11, 2017, 07:54:22 PM
Need more exchanges
We Support Currencies: BTC, LTC, USD, EUR, GBP
Hero Member Offline
Activity: 658
Today at 11:05:54 AM
Need more exchanges
We Support Currencies: BTC, LTC, USD, EUR, GBP
Published at Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:05:54 +0000
[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”] The Peace Plus One – World Sustainability Project is interested in the opportunities afforded to young people in the new economy of Caring Currency. The currency of the 99%.
The concept of Caring Currency is to move from the selfish GREED IS GOOD model of the 1% to a more equitable, distributed wealth model based on the GOOD we individually do for Society, the Environment and the Economy.
bitcoin is one of the early contenders for alternative currency, and an excellent experiment in "alternative worlds" like the , where we ask visitors and new citizens to essentially stay where we are physically, and simply change our perspective to see the beauty and opportunity in the world.
The Be, Buy Boost bitcoin program is a complimentary program in the physical world… to develop the acceptance, adoption, infrastructure and economic ecosystem.. An Alternative Currencies development program to increase the adoption of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in everyday transactions.
The PPO-WSP believes this is a critical effort that must be ramped up immediately to avoid alternative currencies just becoming a speculative bubble like tulilps.
Please join us every Wednesday for "3 Finger Wednesday" By Philip McMaster PeacePlusOne_!/ on 2013-12-04 19:19:33
Blockchain & Crypto for Banking Industry (June) The Blockchain Strategy Programme is designed to provide Business Leaders a comprehensive view of relevant use cases, value propositions and address innovative applications whilst focusing on Infrastructure, Security […]
Twitter search: bitcoin The first thing to know about international law is that it bears o https://t.co/KVhCyCJnNN #Cybersecurity #bitcoin https://t.co/AmjIFSQcoq CyberWarrior @CyberDomain The first thing to know about international law is that it bears o […]
The hard fork part of the is scheduled to take place within about two weeks. This incompatible protocol rule change is set to increase bitcoin’s block weight limit, to allow for more transactions on the network — if everyone adopts the change. Otherwise, it will create a new blockchain and currency that be considered to be “bitcoin.” The list of signatories of this agreement includes several of the largest bitcoin startups and mining pools that, together, claim to represent a majority of users and hash power. Yet, it is far from clear that this part of proposal really has much support outside of these signatories. Most of bitcoin’s , a significant number of , some , as well as suggest otherwise.
And now, a growing list of international bitcoin communities is putting out public statements against the SegWit2x hard fork as well.
— the largest and longest-running bitcoin meetup in South Korea with over 1700 members — was the first user community to put out a on SegWit2x. More precisely, in their own words, the group voiced its “staunch opposition to this November’s proposed hardfork.”
In its statement, the Seoul bitcoin Meetup places emphasis on the manner in which the agreement was made. Typically, changes to the bitcoin protocol go through the Improvement Proposal (BIP) process where it is peer reviewed by developers across the ecosystem, whereas SegWit2x went through the New York Agreement, which was forged at an invite-only meeting among about a dozen company executives.
The Seoul Meetup states:
If a select group of CEOs and investors, no matter how benevolent their intentions, can unilaterally make decisions about the consensus rules without public comment and force these changes upon the network regardless of overall consensus, then bitcoin will have lost the properties that make it valuable in the first place.
Additionally, the Seoul bitcoin Meetup argues that the hard fork is needlessly risky without offering sufficient benefits to warrant the risk. It also takes issue with the of SegWit2x developers not to implement strong replay protection.
On the same day as the Seoul Meetup Group, the Munich meetup group also put out a public statement against the SegWit2x hard fork. This meetup group consists of over 2000 members — though only several dozen of them actually engaged in the vote whether or not the statement against the SegWit2x hard fork would be accepted. This itself was spread via on social media.
In its statement, the bitcoin Munich meetup explains it opposes the SegWit2x hard fork in part because of technical concerns:
Another doubling of the block size so quickly after SegWit seems hasty and might cause further mining centralization.
The statement further argues that a hard fork requires more and better preparation and should include more improvements from the, and it endorses bitcoin Core as “the true bitcoin client.”
The biggest user community also published the longest against the SegWit2x hard fork so far. A combined effort between a significant group of Argentinian and Brazilian users and companies, published on October 17,2017, voiced “their deepest concerns over the upcoming November hardfork as mandated by the so-called New York Agreement (NYA), also known as SegWit2x (S2X).”
Not unlike other critics of the hard fork, emphasis was placed on the process that led to the SegWit2x agreement:
The very nature of an ‘agreement’ between a few parties in a decentralized consensus protocol can be interpreted as an aggression against the network.
Similarly, the statement addresses the lack of transparency from SegWit2x proponents, criticizing the notion of a “political compromise instead of a technical upgrade” and the “consensus imposition instead of consensus building.”
Other points of concern include the lack of replay protection, the rushed nature of the hard fork, misleading statements by SegWit2x proponents and much more.
The Israeli bitcoin Association is a non-profit organization that promotes bitcoin and similar technologies in Israel, with an open membership. On October 24, 2017, this association put out its own on the SegWit2x hard fork.
Slightly different from several of the other statements, the Israeli bitcoin Association emphasizes the right of anyone to fork bitcoin and create a new cryptocurrency. That naturally includes SegWit2x proponents.
But importantly, the association adds:
A protocol change in the currency holding the name ‘bitcoin’, especially one requiring a hard fork, requires overwhelming consensus. The SegWit2x hard fork does not in any way enjoy such consensus, and while this remains the case we cannot refer to the resulting currency as ‘bitcoin.’
The SegWit2x currency will instead be referred to as “‘Bitcoin2x.’ ‘SegWit2x coins,’ BT2, B2X, S2X or any other distinctive term that the industry will adopt.”
The Hong Kong bitcoin Community / bitcoin Association of Hong Kong
The Hong Kong bitcoin Community in general, and the bitcoin Association of Hong Kong specifically, put out against SegWit2x on October 25, 2017.
While technically separate statements, both voice their concern about the lack of consensus for the hard fork. The Hong Kong bitcoin Community — a group of Hong Kong–based companies — states that “the lack of enthusiastic support for this fork among the community is striking.” The association — which mostly exists to promote bitcoin in Hong Kong — states that “the proponents of the hardfork should kindly ask the bitcoin community to support them and then only proceed with the hardfork if there is widespread community support.”
Additionally, the Hong Kong groups speak out against the lack of replay protection in the SegWit2x fork.
Due to the combination of both a lack of consensus across the community and a lack of strong replay protection, we consider SegWit2x a reckless endeavor that will cause disruption and harm to the ecosystem.
The Italian bitcoin community, more specifically a group of companies, meetups, lobbying groups and other organizations, put out a against SegWit2x on October 31, 2017.
The statement is largely inspired by an earlier by the Italian blockchain research lab , which rejected SegWit2x as “an attempt to perform a political takeover of bitcoin.”
The statement by the broader Italian bitcoin community is a bit more compact, but nonetheless touches on many of the familiar points of criticism regarding the SegWit2x hard fork. It reads:
The opposition is especially strong against any action of this kind that could cause huge inconveniences for service providers and serious confusion for users, potentially leading to financial losses: unilateral attempts to appropriate bitcoin name, logo or “ticker”, attempts to mislead light-clients and SPV wallets on alternative networks not explicitly chosen by them, attempts to launch new coins in a way which leave users vulnerable to “replay attacks” or address format confusion, attempts to attack the network with a temporary hashing-power majority in order to create disruptive reorgs or to slow down the normal activity.
Meanwhile, the French-speaking bitcoin communities are voicing their concerns with the SegWit2x hard fork through a. It is currently signed by over 1300 people and counting.
The (French) text that accompanies the petition is mostly inspired by and based on the statement published by the Seoul bitcoin Meetup. Like that statement, this petition emphasizes concerns about the manner in which the agreement was forged, while also noting the lack of replay protection and other problems.
Additionally, the petition includes a call to action to find alternatives for the companies that signed onto and continue to support the SegWit2x hard fork:
We would suggest avoiding the use of services of companies that support the NYA, and we hope to substitute them with alternative solutions.
Are they any more user communities that have put out statements against or in favor of the SegWit2x hard fork? Let me know at aaron@bitcoinmagazine.com.
ThomasJeffersoncoin 
