![Re: noblecoin[nobl] - 8% pos | 1yr+ | marketplace | pay | gift | charities/merchants](https://ohiobitcoin.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/brPsIB-333x372.jpg "Re: noblecoin[nobl] - 8% pos | 1yr+ | marketplace | pay | gift | charities/merchants")
PoloniEx “guesstimated” balance history shows only a very minor dip, only very few NOBL appear to have been withdrawn so far.
![Re: noblecoin[nobl] - 8% pos | 1yr+ | marketplace | pay | gift | charities/merchants](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FPyGRgao.png&t=575&c=jmh2aIoIjK2lMg "Re: noblecoin[nobl] - 8% pos | 1yr+ | marketplace | pay | gift | charities/merchants")
Have you looked at the other coins that were de-listed?
It would be interesting to see as the timing of the de-listing casts a dark shadow over Poloniex: major pumps (in all but 1) + late night de-listing + crashes in all the coins previously pumped. It looks extremely suspicious, and what’s certain is that the implementation of the decision (the decision itself can be argued positive or negative, but that has nothing to do with how the implementation was carried out) did nothing to protect the interests of Poloniex’s customers, but in fact caused them great financial harm. The next question is WHO benefited? These questions need to be addressed and answers given to the victims.
Perhaps a separate thread would be a good idea. What do you think? Starting with the balances of the Poloniex wallets for all the coins de-listed?
Do they plan to keep what isn’t claimed? Now that would be adding insult to injury!
Published at Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:07:11 +0000
[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]
By Halans on 2014-03-24 20:16:14
