But we don’t need hard fork. There are many ways bitcoin can be ‘upgraded’ without HF.
We can have perfectly fine off-chain scaling solution as well, end users and business are ready for it now.
Why risk it with HF when we have other options? Sure, it is easier to say that HF is good when you have altcoin worth $200M to fork.
Not whole economic network worth $17BILLION ATM.
We can have perfectly fine off-chain scaling solution as well, end users and business are ready for it now.
Why risk it with HF when we have other options? Sure, it is easier to say that HF is good when you have altcoin worth $200M to fork.
Not whole economic network worth $17BILLION ATM.
It is now cheaper to send money orders than BTC and may be faster depending on the unconfirmed transactions.
We needed a Hard Fork 3 months ago, and we need it even more now.
Offchain Scaling , without ONCHAIN Capacity will result in Increased Theft of Bitcoins when the Time Locks expire due to network spamming.
Read the LN WhitePaper it is a Know Flaw of LN , and it was stupid of core to promote segwit & LN before increasing the blocksize.
Again , if you children are that scared of hard forks, leave your BTC on the exchanges and the grown ups will handle it for you. 
Published at Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:06:05 +0000
[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]{flickr|100|campaign}
