![Re: [ann][drk] darkcoin | first anonymous coin | first x11 | first dgw | asic resistant](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20223%2028'%3E%3C/svg%3E "Re: [ann][drk] darkcoin | first anonymous coin | first x11 | first dgw | asic resistant")
The thing is that he promises a lot and doesn’t deliver.
…
Aha? Tell me only ONE example please.
Only thing a can rembember that isn’t ready today is Two-factor authentication, but that has no priority.
You were given 4 examples on the previous page. How did you miss that? 
Two-factor authentication is the only one you can remember? What happened to Masternode blinding? github link below goes 404. Blinding was never implemented despite being “working”, and despite Evan’s promises that it was only being delayed due to mobile wallets
There is NO issue with Darksend, in fact the new masternode blinding system is quite impressive.
– DS Speed Improvements : Darksend should be lightning fast now on mainnet. We’re going to delay the implementation of masternode blinding because there’s two separate mobile wallets that are in the process of implementing Darksend and the reference implementation needs to be super stable during this period of time. Once we have the mobile wallets done (which should have Darksend and InstantX support) we can move back to improving Darksend.
The new masternode blinding system is SO impressive he couldn’t figure out how to implement it
Instead, Evan decided to just lie to everyone that Masternode blinding is delayed due to excuses, then never speak about it again.
#FAIL
This pattern of Announce Shiny New Feature —> Pump —-> Abandon New Feature —> Repeat is reprehensible and all the noobs suffering from FOMO should know this.
Dash even pays people to pump its latest Announced-But-Not-Implemented features, despite those features never being finished.
But don’t take my word for it. This guy explains it just as well.
And how did this ‘decentralized’ voting mechanism get a higher priority than masternode blinding?
That’s concerning for a couple reasons. The first being the horrendous and suspicious launch circumstances of the coin and the resulting awful coin distribution, limiting the privacy capabilities of the coin, but also that these large holders basically can change the path of the coin if just two or three of them decide to make a change using the voting system under the pretense of ‘community consensus’. Also concerning is that the first couple initiatives passed are to put even more coins in the hands of the few, and then to create the OTC system allowing them to unload them without (hopefully) wrecking their sell price.
‘member this? Oh yah, I ‘member!
![Re: [ann][drk] darkcoin | first anonymous coin | first x11 | first dgw | asic resistant](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FYPzY46y.png&t=574&c=0JLqHI83yFYNgw "Re: [ann][drk] darkcoin | first anonymous coin | first x11 | first dgw | asic resistant")
Published at Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:06:32 +0000
[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]{flickr|100|campaign}