March 22, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Re: [ANN] Ethbits Local and Ethbits iTrade Token Crowdsale (ICO)

Re: [ann] ethbits local and ethbits itrade token crowdsale (ico)

Re: [ANN] Ethbits Local and Ethbits iTrade Token Crowdsale (ICO)

Guys!

EthBits deleting messages from this forum post in a hard way!
They already deleted mine for the third time and acting like nothing is happend.

Okay guys!

I think you should know.

I had a little conversation with one of the EthBits devs in Telegram and at the end of it i was banned and messages was deleted from there. I wasn’t rude. Just asking questions and waiting to be answered with good arguments. I didnt get one.

The questions i was asking is what could be a guarantee that your another centralized exchange wont be hacked? He assured me that he has a lot security experience and all will be fine.

So to be clear. As i understanded EthBits is a regular centralized exchange where you send your ETH (or any money) to their wallet and you trade on it. Just like Polo, Kraken and other exchanges.
Four major problems im seeing here…

1. We already have another well made exchanges goes through the fire, getting hacked (Polo) and getting stronger every time. And this would mean that if you will be trading on EthBits you are risking your money to lose. Because exchange will be fresh, without any fixes. And every new exchange is more exposed to hacks because developers dont have enough experience developering their own exchange. So there are will be exchange mistakes on which you will be paying by losing your money.

2. We dont need another centalized exchange! We need it decentralized, fast, with good ui/ux. Nothing can happen with such exchange. If it will be hacked its only will be a several addresses with lousy passwords. Nothing more.

3. If EthBits want to make a centralized exchange you dont need blockchain for that. You just regulary creating it without any blockchain crowdsales and shit. If your want money, find it somewhere else!

4. I need to warn you that to get % profit from holding with coins you should be getting a very large sum of it to get something significant. Great example is VDice. They are too giving share % every month to coin holders. But this share is so small that you wont notice it at all. So there will no reason to holding EthBits coins. The only reason to buying coins is to get EthBits dev rich and comfortable. The only guys that will be getting profit from EthBits is developers. Because your gave them a large sum of money.

The great example of how you start a regular exchange is liqui.io.
They somehow managed to not asking for crowdsale money to start exchange. They did that without it.

So i dont see any reason why you should invest in it. Only maybe for quick buy on crowdsale and probable profit dump on trading start. Nothing more.

And one more thing. If the founders can’t endure harsh questions without being rude and banning people for it than i would avoid such project at any cost. Very scammy behavior right here.

And another one messages

jenifive, you can fud around right after it gets listed on the exchange. there would be no use of that comments as for now. nothing has yet stolen.  Grin
meanwhile its verified they were on coinfest Smiley

Re: [ann] ethbits local and ethbits itrade token crowdsale (ico)

saw the photos on https://goo.gl/photos/yeiv7b2JYt2GMm4x9 shared by a user here in the forum.

I would only be glad if EthBits is become legit project but their behaviour to people questions and concernes and bans and message deleting give me reason to avoid investing in such project at all costs. Which I want to warn everyone about that.

Re: [ann] ethbits local and ethbits itrade token crowdsale (ico)

Im very worry right now about the money that people already invested. Could be hard flop with such devs attitude.

The same happend with ahother guys

Re: [ann] ethbits local and ethbits itrade token crowdsale (ico)
Re: [ann] ethbits local and ethbits itrade token crowdsale (ico)

(Why?)

Published at Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:06:21 +0000

[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]SIF Blockchain
Blockchain : émergence d’une nouvelle forme de confiance numérique
La SIF a organisé une journée sur les Blockchains le 15 novembre 2016, à Paris dans les locaux de Telecom ParisTech
By Pierre Metivier on 2016-11-15 14:48:47
Tags

Previous Article

Re: [ANN] æternity blockchain ∞ Получи AE Токен ∞ [PoS x PoW | Smart Contracts]

Next Article

Bitcoin Mining Pool ViaBTC Says No to Segwit

You might be interested in …

Ether Review Legal #5?'??'"?'?BernsWeiss Stops the IRS in its Tracks

Lee Weiss of the US law firm BernsWeiss discusses the Coinbase/IRS dispute. The dispute began in November 2016, when the IRS summoned Coinbase to hand over data about all users who were active on the exchange from 2013 to 2015, with a view to investigating the tax compliance of individuals who have transacted in cryptocurrencies.

On behalf of one or more anonymous Coinbase users, BernsWeiss took the issue to court and was recently granted permission to argue against the summons, which among other things demanded access to users?’? public and private keys. If complied with, this would effectively give the IRS access to all customer funds, making it a clear and easy target for hackers.

This is an unprecedented use of the John Doe summons procedure, which was intended for situations where the IRS has identified specific tax avoidance but can?’?t identify the specific parties who have engaged in that illicit conduct. If determined to be legal, this summons would set a precedent under which the IRS could demand the same from other exchanges. BernsWeiss intends to continue fighting this massive government overreach unless and until the IRS can identify a specific subset of taxpayers who it is reasonably certain are engaging in tax avoidance.

After the hearing, the government removed the request for private keys, now only requiring public keys. The IRS also voluntarily narrowed the scope of the summons to only cover individuals who engaged in virtual currency transactions in excess of $20,000 in a given year. This figure is likely arbitrary, and suggests that the government is simply trying to gather as much information as possible rather than engaging in a specific investigation.

This case illustrates the lack of understanding about these new financial instruments within government. With this summons, the IRS effectively places virtual currencies into the ?’?œinherently suspicious?’ tax avoidance category with things like large transactions, questionable tax shelters, and other mechanisms which are clearly designed to avoid taxes and typically don?’?t have a legitimate purpose?’?Š?'”?’?Šunlike cryptocurrencies.

http://www.law111.com/

twitter.com/BernsWeiss

consensys.net

consensysmedia.net

etherreview.info

https://itunes.apple.com//podcast/the-ether-review/id899090462?mt=2