November 2, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Re: [ANN] DASH SCRYPT COIN (SDASH) <<< NEW ANNOUNCEMENT VERY SOON >>>

Re: [ann] dash scrypt coin (sdash) <<< new announcement very soon >>>

Re: [ANN] DASH SCRYPT COIN (SDASH) <<< NEW ANNOUNCEMENT VERY SOON >>>

Well gentlemen, first of all I wanted to apologize for having been here for some time … we have been a little busy with personal issues, we also have life outside here.

We are working on lots of amazing ideas to make this grow, Sdash is just starting!, Stay tunned and buy Sdash before its tool late.

Clarification of Twitter:

It turns out that when there were Bountys there were a lot of people who followed the account just for interest, they were also very brazen because in the mails that sent us it seemed that they had made a copy paste and to top it all were followers among them, there was some clever I think: “I will tell all my friends to follow me to SDASH and I will charge Bountys and I will get rich” as it turns out they were late, there were only bountys to vote in Nova and of course the reward went from 250 SDASH to 10 and no votes Apart from all those who sent me the mail here and I think we pay you all, if someone has not received it to let us know.

That’s why I stopped using the account for a few days, but next week there will be new and interesting news.

A greeting and let’s think, now the recomensa is only 10 SDASH.

SDASH Team

(Why?)

Published at Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:06:34 +0000

[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]Girls do love to go out in the park
If you enjoy my photos, you are welcome to #‎donate #‎bitcoin to me at: 1Q2LV3bsxZjRBQoRXAXikpUGPCrNeGSUWc
By antwerpenR on 2013-08-17 17:09:35
Tags

Previous Article

Re: If Bitcoin price would fall to the bottom, what would you do next?

Next Article

Bitcoin Entrepreneur Quizzed by UK Police Over Fighting ISIS in Syria

You might be interested in …

U.S. Senate Mulls Reporting Requirements for Cryptocurrencies

USSenateBill

American bitcoin holders may soon have to report their holding to the United States government.

First introduced on May 25, 2015, by Sen. Chuck Grassley [R-IA], Senate Bill S.1241, the
“Combating Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing, and Counterfeiting Act of 2017,” can have serious implications for those involved in the cryptocurrency space. The hearing for S.1241 was held with virtually no public notice on November 28, 2017; the full two-hour hearing can be viewed here.

Currently, the definition of “financial institution” includes banks, trust companies, credit unions, currency exchanges and the like. But according to Section 5312(a) of title 31, the new bill would amend the definition of “financial institution” to include “an issuer, redeemer, or cashier of prepaid access devices, digital currency, or any digital exchanger or tumbler of digital currency.” 

This is most specifically embedded in Section 13:

senatebilltextscreen.png

Sen. Dianne Feinstein [D-CA] said in her opening remarks of the hearing, “The bill criminalizes intentionally concealing ownership or control of a bank account.” Although, during the hearing, no further clarifications were given as to the effects this would have on the cryptocurrency community, based on the amended definition of “financial institution,” it would seem that the bill would criminalize anyone intentionally concealing ownership or control of a digital currency or exchange account. While there is no finalized bill yet, the implication would be that cryptocurrency holders need to fill in federal registration forms for tax disclosure, quarterly reporting and more.

Notably, while the purpose of the bill and hearing had to do with adding digital currencies and exchanges to the definition of financial institutions, there was almost no discussion on the topic other than briefly in reference to drug cartels using them to launder money. For example, nowhere in the testimony by Coinbase board of directors member Kathryn Haun Rodriguez does she mention digital currencies or exchanges, and at no time was she asked any questions about them.

Unsurprisingly, the bill is receiving pushback from some cryptocurrency holders. Activists on Reddit have started a social media campaign in opposition to the bill, and are suggesting others to tweet: “@senjudiciary that #Bitcoiners are not #Crooks Remove #DigitalCurrencies from Section 13 of S1241.” Others are contacting their senators directly.

The post U.S. Senate Mulls Reporting Requirements for Cryptocurrencies appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.

Re: gambling inspiration

Re: Gambling Inspiration

Re: Gambling Inspiration Nothing. I can’t considered my gambling activity included as one of the highlights in my life so being have an inspiration as my lucky charm to win is out of my context. […]