October 12, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Pro-BTC Movement Scraps Lawsuit Against Ver’s Bitcoin.com, Citing Lack Of Funds

Pro-btc movement scraps lawsuit against ver’s bitcoin. Com, citing lack of funds

Pro-BTC Movement Scraps Lawsuit Against Ver’s Bitcoin.com, Citing Lack Of Funds

The pro-bitcoin community movement that galvanized last week against Bitcoin.com has reversed its plans to level a lawsuit against the site, community leader MoneyTrigz announced on the group’s Telegram channel yesterday, May 3.

Members of the movement were outraged that major crypto wallet and media service bitcoin.com — run by prominent bitcoin Cash-proponent Roger Ver — appeared to be intentionally blurring the distinction between bitcoin (BTC) and bitcoin Cash (BCH), and misleading buyers into buying the latter.

On April 27, the group launched a website to gather claimants and donations for a promised lawsuit. However, the apparent initiator of the movement, MoneyTrigz, said yesterday they are cancelling the initiative due to the fact that only $3700 in BTC has been raised so far:

The group’s Telegram channel has amassed 1125 members to press time, and MoneyTrigz is now refunding the 33 users who donated to the effort:

Pro-btc movement scraps lawsuit against ver’s bitcoin. Com, citing lack of funds

Many of the group’s supporters point out that under just the threat of legal action from the movement, bitcoin.com has been forced to make significant changes to the content of its site. Litecoin creator and crypto community influencer Charlie Lee noted one of the changes on Twitter this week:

The group’s response to the decision to pull the lawsuit has been largely positive, with one user saying it was “the first time Roger [Ver] scaled back on his fraudulent practices.”

The battle for brand dominance between bitcoin and bitcoin Cash, a coin whose advocates argue provides better scalability than the world’s top coin, has continued to rage since bitcoin Cash hard-forked from the bitcoin blockchain in August 2017.

Published at Fri, 04 May 2018 10:15:01 +0000

bitcoin

Previous Article

Binance CEO Says Bitcoin’s Recent Dip is a Blip on the Radar

Next Article

Bitcoin in Brief Friday: Farms on Wheels, a Hotel, and Even a Simulator for Miners

You might be interested in …

bitcoin

bitcoinBy stevegarfield on 2011-09-11 11:19:18

Запись в школы и детсады Новосибирска переведут на блокчейн

ForkLog Запись в школы и детсады Новосибирска переведут на блокчейн Ученые из Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук выступили с предложением внедрить технологию распределенного реестра в автоматизированную систему регистрации дошкольников и школьников Новосибирска. Об этом сообщает […]

U.S. Senate Mulls Reporting Requirements for Cryptocurrencies

USSenateBill

American bitcoin holders may soon have to report their holding to the United States government.

First introduced on May 25, 2015, by Sen. Chuck Grassley [R-IA], Senate Bill S.1241, the
“Combating Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing, and Counterfeiting Act of 2017,” can have serious implications for those involved in the cryptocurrency space. The hearing for S.1241 was held with virtually no public notice on November 28, 2017; the full two-hour hearing can be viewed here.

Currently, the definition of “financial institution” includes banks, trust companies, credit unions, currency exchanges and the like. But according to Section 5312(a) of title 31, the new bill would amend the definition of “financial institution” to include “an issuer, redeemer, or cashier of prepaid access devices, digital currency, or any digital exchanger or tumbler of digital currency.” 

This is most specifically embedded in Section 13:

senatebilltextscreen.png

Sen. Dianne Feinstein [D-CA] said in her opening remarks of the hearing, “The bill criminalizes intentionally concealing ownership or control of a bank account.” Although, during the hearing, no further clarifications were given as to the effects this would have on the cryptocurrency community, based on the amended definition of “financial institution,” it would seem that the bill would criminalize anyone intentionally concealing ownership or control of a digital currency or exchange account. While there is no finalized bill yet, the implication would be that cryptocurrency holders need to fill in federal registration forms for tax disclosure, quarterly reporting and more.

Notably, while the purpose of the bill and hearing had to do with adding digital currencies and exchanges to the definition of financial institutions, there was almost no discussion on the topic other than briefly in reference to drug cartels using them to launder money. For example, nowhere in the testimony by Coinbase board of directors member Kathryn Haun Rodriguez does she mention digital currencies or exchanges, and at no time was she asked any questions about them.

Unsurprisingly, the bill is receiving pushback from some cryptocurrency holders. Activists on Reddit have started a social media campaign in opposition to the bill, and are suggesting others to tweet: “@senjudiciary that #Bitcoiners are not #Crooks Remove #DigitalCurrencies from Section 13 of S1241.” Others are contacting their senators directly.

The post U.S. Senate Mulls Reporting Requirements for Cryptocurrencies appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.