January 22, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Patreon as a Fascist Company

Patreon as a Fascist Company

This article was originally published on Dec 18, 2018 at Rose Crypto. Read the unabridged piece there!

The modern-day version of a book burning — something that the Nazis did regularly — is deplatforming. The dreadful irony of it is that the ones being deplatformed are constantly derided as Nazis, but day by day it seems more like any sort of dissident is being targeted. Be warned: if you stand up against the cartel-style soft monopoly in Silicon Valley, its iron fist might come down hard on your civil rights. It’s time to start asking ourselves a very simple question: are companies like Patreon the new Nazis? Mark Kern, a well-known game designer who was the team lead for vanilla World of Warcraft, summed it up very well:

Let’s back up a minute. What is this all about?

Sargon of Akkad Deplatformed

Sargon of Akkad — real name Carl Benjamin — is an online influencer who speaks about political topics, such as classical liberalism and GamerGate. Sargon has the wrong politics. They’re wrong, that is, from the standpoint of those in Silicon Valley — people who are almost invariably extremely far left and anti-free-speech. He is undoubtedly a controversial guy and is most well known for his antifeminist views.

On December 6th, 2018, he was banned from Patreon. This is a pretty big deal. He was earning over $12,000 a month on the platform — a six figure salary! A few days before this, Milo Yiannopolous was also removed. Suffice to say that Patreon is on the political warpath, intent on eliminating political dissidents from its platform. Here’s the big question you should be asking yourself about all of this: in what world does it make sense that this fruitcake should be the arbitrator of whether or not someone can have a livelihood?

Almost as creepy looking as Zuckerberg, but not quite.

Note that there’s no free market to run to here. Free speech oriented Patreon alternatives like Hatreon and SubscribeStar tend to get brutally stomped out by the cartel-style monopoly in both Silicon Valley and the financial world. It’s a sort of wombo combo — Google makes sure you don’t show up on the rankings, the bank card associations or the payment processors down the line make sure you can’t take credit cards, and on and on the great threshing engine goes as it chews up all of our civil rights.

The Inevitably Anodyne Corporate Response

To their credit, Patreon did respond to this controversy — although they took their sweet time doing it.

On December 17th, almost two weeks since deplatforming Sargon, Patreon’s Jacqueline Hart created a Medium post titled “Hate Speech on Patreon.” For context, this is Jacqueline Hart’s LinkedIn profile:

“Trust & Safety” — I feel safer already!

I like to call people like this “empty suits.” People who work in HR or on Orwellian “Trust & Safety” teams are actually worse than useless — they actively make the world a more hellish place. Imagine having a job where you’re paid to act as a sort of modern-day Internet Gestapo!

Medium, by the way, is the same blogging site which unceremoniously censored me before the creation of my website. Of course, it’s unlikely that they’d ever treat one of their friends in the Silicon Valley oligopoly in the same nasty way, no matter how much Patreon spits on its own customers. I digress. I’m going to take her response piece by piece…

Published at Wed, 06 Feb 2019 06:00:28 +0000

Previous Article

Crypto Market Update: BNB Outperforms, EOS, ₿itcoin Cash, Tron (TRX) Price Analysis

Next Article

TurboTax Now Offers Cryptocurrency Tax Services

You might be interested in …

Price of Bitcoin’s ‘Lite’ Brother is Soaring as SegWit Seems Imminent

Two cases for Segregated Witness (SegWit) activation via different channels are moving closer to reality this week for bitcoin. Meanwhile, Litecoin is getting closer to its own SW activation as its price is climbing to new highs.


Litecoin Hits 3-Year High

Despite not suffering the same teething problems as bitcoin, SegWit appears to have definitely caught on at Litecoin, with support moving over 58%. At 75%, SegWit will trigger, as it already has done for fellow altcoin asset Syscoin.

sw

Litecoin creator Charlie Lee has been a vocal proponent of SegWit, but not as a solution to block scaling, especially since Litecoin does not have any capacity issues.

“The main fix is transaction malleability, which would allow Lightning Networks (LN) to be built on top of Litecoin,” he wrote back in January.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

It appears traders have welcomed the news with Lee proclaiming the market gains as sign of support for SegWit activation. Litecoin price broke $9 USD on Monday, a value it hasn’t seen in three years.

SegWit2MB Could See Reality in December 

Meanwhile, in bitcoin-land, implementation via 2-megabyte blocks, known as SegWit2MB, received support from ShapeShift CEO Erik Voorhees and subsequently from Andreas Antonopoulos.

At the same time, ex-BTCC COO Samson Mow has announced the winner of his coding competition to produce a “safe” method of introducing SegWit via a user-activated soft fork (UASF).

Erik-Voorhees-Bitcoinist

In a post on Money And State published Sunday, Voorhees announced that SegWit2MB had been formally proposed to bitcoin Core mailing list recipients.

Its proponents, bitcoin security consultant Sergio Lerner and RootStock, foresee a successfully accepted proposal coming into force December 14, 2017 – if it gains community support.

Balancing ‘Social’ and ‘Technical’

Lerner was first to say that it was neither a technically perfect solution, nor a one-size-fits-all patch. Rather he referred to SegWit2MB as a “least common denominator.”

He explained:

Segwit2Mb is the project to merge into bitcoin a minimal patch that aims to untangle the current conflict between different political positions regarding segwit activation vs. an increase of the on-chain blockchain space through a standard block size increase.

Lerner added that the concept was hardly a new idea, and Voorhees commented that the “cost of conflict” meant that a “social” as well as a technical solution was badly needed.

sg4iouu

bitcoin is a technical project, absolutely. Yet it is a social project as well […] This current impasse is similarly both technical and social, and it continues at great cost,” he wrote.

Weighing up the proposal, Voorhees similarly touched on its use as a bridge between technical and social requirements of the community.

“SegWit2MB is the first reasonable compromise, considering the impasse’s technical and social aspects, actually put forth in code, based on well-known and studied fundamental components from bitcoin’s best engineers,” he concluded.

Andreas Antonopoulos agreed with Voorhees’ perspective on Twitter, describing SegWit2MB as a “political, not technical solution.”

“Segwit2MB is far from ideal but better than more scaling war,” he added.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Pipped To The Post By UASF?

Meanwhile, Mow announced on Twitter he was awarding 5.95 BTC to a coder named shaolinfry for his creation of Mow’s required “safe” method of activating SegWit via UASF.

Shaolinfry confirmed receipt of the money on Twitter, which was followed by another user sending 1 BTC as thanks for developing the potential activation solution.

As it stands now, SegWit activation is still well below the 95% threshold it needs to activate, which is why the UASF is becoming an increasingly popular idea in an effort to bypass the deadlock with miners.

Across the divide, Chain engineer Oleg Andreev added to opinion that bitcoin’s capacity problems were something of a myth and that no block size increase was needed.

bitcoin works just fine,” he said Monday.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Would you prefer SegWit2MB or UASF? Let us know in the comments below!


Images courtesy of Shutterstock, Twitter, segwit.co, Shapeshift.io 

The post Price of Bitcoin’s ‘Lite’ Brother is Soaring as SegWit Seems Imminent appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.