The central banks of Norway and England have published reports exploring different models for central bank-issued cryptocurrencies. By contrast, Federal Reserve governor, Lael Brainard, recently expressed her opposition to central bank cryptocurrencies – claiming that such would result in broad “macroeconomic consequences.”
Also Read:
Decline of Cash Prompts Norwegian Central Bank to Consider Central Bank-Issued Digital Currency

Norges Bank identifies three specific purposes for a central bank-issued consideration that it believes “merits further consideration: […] ensur[ing] a public and credit risk-free alternative to deposits in private banks, in addition to cash[,] function[ing] as an independent backup solution for the ordinary electronic payments systems,” and “ensur[ing] the existence of suitable legal tender as a supplement to cash.”
The report states that “It is too early to conclude whether Norges Bank should take the initiative in introducing a CBDC. The impacts of a CBDC – and the socio-economic cost-benefit analysis – will depend on the specific design. The design, in turn, will depend on the purpose of introducing a CBDC,“ adding that “A CBDC raises complex issues,” and “There is virtually no international experience to draw on.” Norges Bank states that it “will continue to issue cash as long as there is demand for it. But when cash usage declines, a CBDC can be an alternative to deposit money. The primary purpose of a CBDC is to ensure confidence in money and the monetary system.”
“Further analysis is needed to assess the purposes of a CBDC, the types of solutions that best achieve these purposes and the benefits measured against financial and other costs. This is a long-term undertaking. The aim of publishing the working group’s report is to inform the public about its work, disseminate knowledge[.] and initiate a dialogue with stakeholders,” the report states.
English Central Bank Explores Different Models for Central Bank-Issued Cryptocurrency

The three models explore are the “Financial Institutions Access” model (FI), the “Economy-Wide Access” model (EW), and the “Financial Institutions Plus CBDC-Backed Narrow Bank Access” model (FI+). The FI model would see “CBDC access […] limited to banks and [non-bank financial institutions (FBFIs)],” whereas the EW model additionally allow “households and firms” to access CBDC. The FI+ model would see “CBDC access […] limited to banks and NBFIs,” however, “Within the NBFI sector there is at least one financial institution that acts as a narrow bank, providing a financial asset to households and firms that is fully backed by CBDC but that does not extend credit. That is, they provide households and firms with an asset that has the risk profile of central bank money, rather than a risk profile linked to the financial institution and of its borrowers.”
The report claims to “find that if the introduction of CBDC follows a set of core principles, bank funding is not necessarily reduced, credit and liquidity provision to the private sector need not contract, and the risk of a system-wide run from bank deposits to CBDC is addressed.” Said principles are that “CBDC pays an adjustable interest rate,” that “CBDC and reserves are distinct, and not convertible into each other,” “No guarantee [of] on-demand convertibility of bank deposits into CBDC at commercial banks,” and that “The central bank issues CBDC only against eligible securities.”
U.S. Federal Reserve Governor Opposed to Central Bank-Issued Digital Currencies

expressed a number of concerns pertaining to central bank digital currencies, stating that “there are serious technical and operational challenges that would need to be overcome,” including “the risk of creating a global target for cyberattacks or a ready means of money laundering.”
Mrs. Brainard argued that “the issuance of central bank digital currency could have implications for retail banking beyond payments,” asserting that “If a successful central bank digital currency were to become widely used, it could become a substitute for retail banking deposits. This could restrict banks’ ability to make loans for productive economic activities and have broader macroeconomic consequences.“ The governor also claimed that “the parallel coexistence of central bank digital currency with retail banking deposits could raise the risk of runs on the banking system in times of stress.”
Governor Brainard concluded that “there is no compelling demonstrated need for a Fed-issued digital currency,” adding that “most consumers and businesses in the U.S. already make retail payments electronically using debit and credit cards, payment applications, and the automated clearinghouse network.”
What is your opinion on central bank-issued cryptocurrencies? Tell us in the comments section below!
Images courtesy of Shutterstock
Need to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Check our section.
The post appeared first on .
has solid experience in the manufacturing industry. This company was created in 2013 as an industry first online design-to-manufacture interactive supply chain ecosystem. SyncFab has significantly changed through years of dedicated work. However, the main idea of the project stays the same: manufacturing locally is best for the planet. And today SyncFab is a bright representative of the blockchain-based projects.
The pioneer in the sphere of peer-to-peer industrial marketplace customized for the multi-trillion dollar manufacturing industry has successfully completed private and public token sale last month. Lots of supporters have been attracted by the convenience of manufacturing process, cost reduction and high level of security. Recently SyncFab released on the problems of the manufacturing problems that blockchain has solved and the list turned out to be amazing: from eliminating the third party to absolute transparency.
The team of SyncFab is deeply devoted to improving the communication between buyers and hardware manufactures: they have been using a little quiet time after the token sale to educate both suppliers and customers about the SyncFab ecosystem. The special emphasis was placed on hardware startups, research facilities, large companies, purchasing departments and engineering departments.
The geography of is absolutely amazing. On the 6th of March SyncFab became a participant of the bitcoin and Blockchain Conference in Bangkok. The team headed by the CEO of the company Jeremy Goodwin gave a presentation on the SyncFab’s solutions and described the future of the native .
Next day the SyncFab team moved to the Vietnam Blockchain Week to deliver a presentation on the role of blockchain in the manufacturing industry. The experts from the company also took active part I discussing the usage of blockchain in smart city development.
Next important event brought the SyncFab team to Japan. CEO Jeremy Goodwin discussed the influence of blockchain revolution on the manufacturing industry with the residents of the Startup Hub created by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government.
On the 19th of April the team joined the Korea Innotech 2018 Blockchain Industry 4.0 conference. The invitation of the Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency combined with the opportunity to share experiences with the representatives of the country with the world’s highest robot workforce density inspired the team to take this journey.
The educational tour brought SyncFab to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The Asia-Pacific region has been investing a lot in smart factories – and the follow-up rise of the smart manufacturing market makes the SyncFab ecosystem a highly demanded service.
While one part of the SyncFab team was going around the world to raise the awareness of the platform, the other one has been working hard to improve the platform and support the clients. The developers released software updates and worked on integration with the Bancor Protocol. SyncFab also continues to develop its community: it is about to surpass the 40,000 participants’ mark.
The MCG token is already incorporated into the platform and is listed on COBINHOOD, CoinExchange and IDEX. Even though the SyncFab team has to work is on the tight schedule, it takes part in lots of other activities that help to create the network of supporters, such as sharing thoughts on the supply chain revolution with the US head of Fintech at Swisscom B2B or advocating blockchain and tokenized incentives to the Vice Mayor of the City of Berkeley, CA.. SyncFab is literally everywhere – both the decentralized platform itself and the people working on its development.
The post appeared first on .