July 14, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Netflix Implementing Ads Would Be Suicide

Netflix implementing ads would be suicide

Netflix Implementing Ads Would Be Suicide

Netflix implementing ads would be suicide

By CCN: Staying ad-free will be the death of Netflix. Or, at least that’s what YouTube and JPMorgan believe. On a panel at IAB’s Digital Content NewFronts today, executives from the two companies discussed Netflix ads (or lack thereof) alongside representatives from UM media agency and MediaLink. The panel overwhelmingly agreed that Netflix would have to start serving up ads soon or other competitors would begin chipping away at their market share.

Are ads the solution, though?

The Netflix Conundrum

Netflix has remained ad-free since launching its streaming platform in 2007. Other than on-demand content, the lack of commercials is what drove users away from cable television and into the arms of the streaming behemoth.

Now, Netflix boasts nearly 150 million subscribers with almost 10 million of those joining in Q1 alone. The consistent stream of new subscribers has made Netflix one of the best-performing stocks of the past five years. But, the continuous influx of revenue still falls several steps short of what the company is spending each quarter.

The Netflix stock price has grown 670% in the last five years. | Source: Yahoo Finance

Although revenue has risen 22.2% year-over-year, Netflix predicts its 2019 cash flow to be $3.5 billion in the red. The negative cash flow is largely due to the company’s ridiculous original content budget.

Netflix is currently chipping away at this deficit with plans for it to plateau this year at around $3 billion. So far, the company has only adjusted subscription rates to do so. Over time, subscription prices have steadily risen from $8 and currently lie in the $9-$16 range.

Netflix has increased subscription prices four times since launching the streaming service. | Source: Recode

Clearly, those price jumps haven’t been enough, which is why many are calling for ads as the company-saving solution.

Netflix Has Other Options

Even with the boost in subscription prices, the Netflix user base continues to grow. After bumping up prices globally in Q4 2017, Netflix increased its subscriber count to the tune of 50% over Wall Street analyst estimates. Today, the company may still be pricing its subscription service too low and should test higher tiers before even thinking about implementing advertising.

Looking on the other side of the balance sheet, Netflix has the opportunity to cut costs immensely. Spending billions on original content made sense over the last few years, but that’s no longer the case. They should now have plenty of results from their expensive content experiments.

Netflix needs to trim down its original content budget and focus on the shows and movies that have the best odds of becoming a smashing success. That means putting a renewed focus on hits such as Orange is the New Black and Ozark while stopping stinkers like The Week Of at the drawing board.

Unfortunately for Netflix, when you compare the popularity of original shows to third-party programming, the numbers aren’t even close. In 2018, just two out of the top 10 most watched Netflix shows were homegrown, showing that the billions they spent may not have been worth it.

Nobody Likes Ads

Netflix has already given ads a shot. Recently, the platform added between-show promos for its original content but received heavy pushback from the community. Implementing mid-show ads would likely cause a massive exodus of customers. And we can be sure that competitors Disney and Hulu will be there to welcome those who leave.

The rest of the content world is shifting away from advertisement-dependent revenue streams. Ad-free Spotify is a top choice for audio content. And users are jumping ship from YouTube to support creators on ad-free alternatives like Patreon. Why would Netflix move the opposite way?

Published at Mon, 29 Apr 2019 23:08:44 +0000

Previous Article

RoboMarkets Becomes the Official Partner of BMW M Motorsport

Next Article

Do Jaguar Land Rover & IOTA Hold the Key to Mass Crypto Adoption?

You might be interested in …

South Korea Tightens Grip, But Won’t Ban Bitcoin Trading

It was only a matter of time until authorities pulled the reins in on one of the biggest crypto trading nations in the world. South Korea, which is responsible for as much as 25% of total crypto trading volume, said on Thursday it will impose additional measures to regulate speculation in crypto within the country.


South Korea Will Ban Anonymous Crypto Trading

As previously reported that more regulations are expected, South Korean regulators have confirmed additional measures to curb illegal activities at cryptocurrency exchanges. According to Reuters, the government noted that trading prices of most digital currencies were much higher on South Korean exchanges than they were on exchanges in other countries.

A government spokesperson made the following statement:

The government had warned several times that virtual coins cannot play a role as actual currency and could result in high losses due to excessive volatility.

The first steps will include a ban on opening anonymous crypto trading accounts. Most exchanges require photographic proof of identity anyway, so this regulation is nothing to be concerned about.

Secondly, however, is a more alarming plan to introduce new legislation which will allow regulators to close virtual coin exchanges if required. This measure had been recommended by the justice ministry, according to the statement.

Previously, South Korea had announced a plan to tax capital gains from cryptocurrency trading to tackle what it perceives as the risk of excessive speculation.

Banks Backing Off

As expected, earlier this week, two major banks in South Korea announced that they are closing reward programs, which allow clients to purchase bitcoins with credit card bonus points.

Commercial banks in the country are increasingly preventing the opening of new virtual accounts, which are necessary to trade on South Korean crypto exchanges.

South Korea Bans Bitcoin Futures As Authorities Consider Crypto Income Tax

In addition to Shinhan Bank and KB Kookmin Bank closing rewards programs next month, Woori Bank and Korea Development Bank also announced that they would be closing all virtual accounts provided to exchanges.

It is no surprise that banks in South Korea and elsewhere are pulling back from crypto; the concept essentially goes against their business model. Unfortunately, in this embryonic industry, traders still need to rely on exchanges, many of which, such as Coinbase, have adopted banking-style models of fees and commissions. Only when crypto trading is truly decentralized and peer-to-peer will the masses start to benefit more than the banks and exchanges.

Will the Korean clampdown affect the markets? Add your thoughts to the comments below.


Images courtesy of Pixabay, PublicDomainPictures, and Bitcoinist archives.

The post South Korea Tightens Grip, But Won’t Ban Bitcoin Trading appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.