October 31, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Mythbusting: Why Bitcoin Can Never Go to Zero

Mythbusting: why bitcoin can never go to zero

Mythbusting: Why Bitcoin Can Never Go to Zero

Bitcoin’s polarizing effect has people on both ends of the scale either proclaiming it is going to the moon or it is going to zero. The volatile, unprecedented, and revolutionary monetary system that is cryptocurrency has a future that not many can accurately predict, but as time has gone on, the idea that bitcoin is going to zero seems more and more far fetched.

A number of commentators, just recently — when bitcoin has been booming — have come forward with predictions of doom and gloom, warning investors that this new system of money — and investment opportunities — will fall to complete worthlessness.

bitcoin is barely 10 years old, and has gone from being worth zero to being worth $20,000. So, as we sit with the price lower than many would have hoped, is it feeble to think it can reach as low as zero?

‘It’s going down’

It doesn't matter if it is skeptical friends around a dinner table, or Dr. Doom himself Nouriel Roubini, the prediction that bitcoin will go to zero often comes up as a counter punch to all the positive strides that cryptocurrencies are making.

Being a new and unprecedented ecosystem, which operates in such established ecosystems as finance and money, it is fascinating to watch how the volatile asset advances. One day it is up, and one day it is down — but what makes people think it will fail all together?

In early February, when Bitcoin was crashing down toward $6,000, the chairman of Roubini Macro Associates, Nouriel Roubini — also known as "Dr Doom" for his pessimistic economic outlooks — made a bold claim:

Dr Doom had some backup at this low point for bitcoin as Joe Davis — Vanguard’s global chief economist and the head of its investment strategy group — weighed in. He wrote in a blog post:

“I see a decent probability that its price goes to zero.”

He also chimed in that he is optimistic about blockchain, however. But this separation of blockchain and bitcoin by investors and institutionalized money movers is flawed, and wrongly brought up over and over again as ‘blockchain over Bitcoin’.

Goldman Sachs has also had their say on cryptocurrencies and the possibility of going to zero, but with the caveat that the bigger — and therefore stronger ones — will evolve and survive. Head of investment research, Steve Strongin said:

“Whether any of today’s cryptocurrencies will survive over the long run seems unlikely to me, although parts of them may evolve and survive. Because of the lack of intrinsic value, the currencies that don’t survive will most likely trade to zero.”

The reasons given by these men for bitcoin going to zero, — or, in Strongin's case, other cryptocurrencies — range from market manipulation to asset bubbles to lack of intrinsic values. All of these instances and reasons, however, are starting to feel a little outdated.

The fast moving cryptocurrency world has outgrown a number of detractions, most notably the Tulip comparison, which is one of Joe Davis’ favorite comparisons. In recent months, even with the market being so low, there has been a big wave of adoption in the use of blockchain, as well as cryptocurrency.

The blockchain revolution

While bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are a financial and monetary phenomenon, they are also classed as a technological advancement, thanks to the underlying blockchain technology. This means that there is a whole wave of adoption that can take place across different sectors which can use blockchain and cryptocurrencies.

The adoption that has happened recently has been seen at the top level in a few sectors, namely banks, major corporations and even governments.

There have been big moves by some major global banks to try to get an effective crypto-trading desk that their customers can use, and that they can be party to offering, up and running. Banks are looking to jump on the cryptocurrency bandwagon because demand from customers is so high.

Farzam Ehsani, a former blockchain lead at Rand Merchant Bank and now co-founder and CEO of VALR, told Cointelegraph:

“All banks are realizing they need to get onto this blockchain boat, I don’t think many banks necessarily understand where the boat is going, but they realize that this is a development that is taking off and that, if they want to be on this journey that everyone is going on, they need to be on the boat.”

Furthermore, Companies on the scale of Microsoft, Amazon, IBM and Oracle are also racing to start providing customer-facing blockchain solutions — often tied to cryptocurrencies — in order to be the first to market with an effective and revolutionary product.

Finally, the governments, so often the handbrake of bitcoin and cryptocurrency adoption, are starting to come around, with the Dutch government being a good example of how this is happening. Just last month, it was reported that the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy had created a unit tasked with researching the further development of blockchain across technology.

So, what does this all mean for bitcoin and the idea that it can go to zero?

A lot of this hinges on the belief that cryptocurrencies and blockchain can be separated. There is a big push for blockchain adoption — as described above — but the same cannot be said to be as strong for bitcoin and cryptocurrency adoption.

However, the argument is that the two are definitely linked. Those outside of the blockchain and cryptocurrency space are arguing that the two facets cannot be separated, and thus, if there is an adoption in blockchain, there must be a correlation of benefit to the cryptocurrency space.

With so many faculties as large and dominate as global banks, major corporations and even governments, entering the blockchain space, it would seem hard to see them going on without the cryptocurrency aspect of it.

CEO of Lightning Labs — the developer of the blockchain-scaling Lightning protocol — Elizabeth Stark has spoken out to challenge the Wall Street and traditional financial sector narrative that puts its faith in blockchain, not bitcoin, in trying to seperate the two so distinctly.

“When we first pitched my company Lightning Labs, we actually took the word ‘bitcoin’ out of our deck and our marketing material because it was so much about blockchain. Now, I feel like we’ve entered into a ‘bitcoin, not blockchain’ world, where people understand the value of cryptocurrency technology and what these can bring. You also have proof-of-work in bitcoin, you have the public/private key cryptography. There are other things that make bitcoin special. Somehow, the blockchain part got separated and became a thing.”

Adaptable cryptocurrency

Emin Gün Sirer, an associate professor at Cornell University, shared some light on the robustness of cryptocurrencies with Cointelegraph and just how difficult it is for them to completely disappear.

“We have seen that these technologies are quite robust. Chains do not just disappear, they are resilient and stick around. Many of us spent years proselytizing for these technologies in general and bitcoin in particular. As a result, it had immense goodwill and brand recognition built around it. So there will always be a community around the brand that will ensure that that chain makes progress.”

Gün Sirer’s point — about bitcoin in particular — is somewhat tied to blockchain technology and where it now stands. The adoption of bitcoin and blockchain has almost reached a critical mass, where it is difficult for it to suddenly lose total support.

bitcoin’s brand has exploded recently, and there is evidence both to back up its popularity and just how important that popularity is to its growth and survival.

Btc

Source: Google Trends

There is a correlation between Google search trends for bitcoin and the price of bitcoin, which shows that higher interest in and popularity of the coin is intrinsically tied to its price, and thus, in many respects, its success.

This has been noted before in what is called a ‘Satoshi Cycle’

However, Gün Sirer does add:

“They might need to hard fork it to breathe new life into it after a chain death spiral, and it might serve a niche function, its medium of transfer and store of value functionality having been usurped by others. But still, I suspect there will always be a bitcoin brand and a niche community around it.”

Intrinsically unstoppable

While its adoption continues to grow and become more entrenched as a technology and a financial system in everyday life, bitcoin and cryptocurrencies — as well as blockchain — becomes harder and harder to simply move on from.

But even more than that, now that it is becoming established, it is also showing that it is harder to kill than, say, a stock, a technological fad or countless other comparisons which can die.

Many will compare bitcoin to a company or stock, which can go to zero, as a reason not to invest in it. However, bitcoin is decentralized and autonomous. There is not one man, group or board of directors that can run it into the ground.

On that same note, it is also impossible to stop — as regulators are finding out. With the likes of China and others trying to ban bitcoin outright, they are discovering that they are not fighting anything tangible.

But bitcoin is also adept at evolving and adapting — again, based on its intrinsic values. It is governed by a majority vote, and as things change and challenge it, the community chooses a path that is best for its survival. There may be battles and ‘civil wars’ along the way, but ultimately, the advancements of bitcoin are for its survival.

Finally, even the biggest detractors of bitcoin and the cryptocurrency space are finding it hard to fault the potential of blockchain technology. Some like to try and differentiate cryptocurrency from blockchain, but they are mistaken in that sense.

Jehan Chu, co-founder of Kenetic Capital — a firm working towards spreading the adoption of blockchain technology — is also of the opinion that this new system is something that is fixing the problems of the past. Chu told Cointelegraph:

"bitcoin will never go to zero because it is a hedge against falling currencies, inefficient economies and increasingly systemic inequality. bitcoin represents the currency of a better future for society, and people will always invest in their future."

Too many vested parties

bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, blockchain, all these interlinked parts are slowly spreading through society into all different ecosystems. And, as they entrench themselves, their very makeup means it is hard for them to be eliminated.

Regulators have tried, and also come to a realization that they can’t totally oust cryptocurrencies, so now they are trying to work with them. This has opened the door for the traditional sectors of the globe to enter the market and make cryptocurrencies more part of the everyday.

This system of decentralized, adaptive, autonomous and democratic money has too many vested parties and too many strong characteristics, making it hard to eliminate totally in its current form.

Published at Sun, 01 Jul 2018 21:42:00 +0000

bitcoin

Previous Article

PotCoin (POT), HempCoin (THC), and DopeCoin (DOPE) to Ride the BOOMING Marijuana Industry $$$

Next Article

Kendrick Lamar Cypher TDE Jay Rock Schoolboy q isaiah rashad absoul sd downlo

You might be interested in …

Blockchain & bitcoin conference australia

Blockchain & Bitcoin Conference Australia

Blockchain & bitcoin Conference AustraliaBlockchain & bitcoin Conference Australia is a large-scale conference dedicated to the blockchain technology and the cryptocurrency market. Speakers of the conference including blockchain developers, lawyers and investors will discuss topical […]

减小比特币分叉在网络升级中的风险

减小比特币分叉在网络升级中的风险 如何管理分叉及分叉过程的分裂,一个给交易所和企业的指南 (译者注:本文将Fork译为分叉,仅指协议升级的一种方式,有硬分叉hard fork和软分叉soft fork之分。而将Split译为分裂,是指分叉过程中区块链产生分裂成两条链的过程。而将Fork Split译为分叉分裂,意思是分叉过程后产生了分裂。) 摘要 在比特币社区,大家都极力主张自己的扩容方案,甚至不惜以牺牲系统广泛的共识或妥协为代价,自比特币诞生以来,目前是比特币分叉过程中发生分裂的风险最高的。目前有一件事情是可以肯定的,比特币扩容方案的僵局一直持续下去的话,那么唯一的结果就是我们无法实现比特币扩容。从这个意义上来说,尽管有些不公平,但是对于所有的成员来说,进行分叉后分裂是最好的结果。本文在比特币要进行分叉分裂的假设下,试图说明企业和用户在比特币区块链上进行分叉分裂的技术处理方式,以及如何管理比特币区块。。 本文的动机是,最近从Core 社区传出要实行UASF(一个只需要少数算力支持,不过还是需要大多数经济节点支持的执行方案)的消息,这对网络稳定的威胁是清晰且迫近的,尤其是经营比特币的交易所和企业。在UASF的情况下,区块链有可能分成2个或者3个分支,如果在毫无预警的情况下实行UASF,企业,尤其是交易所如果无法应对这一特殊情况,有可能面临丢失客户资金的风险。不管他们实际上是否有意支持各种分叉,本文的目的在于让企业做好准备,以便他们能够在那样的情况下继续保护客户资金。 区块链分叉类型 首先我们列举了可能发生的分叉类型 软分叉 软分叉是一个增加新的共识规则,这个新的共识规则是当前规则的子集。在新链上,区块遵守新的更严格的规则将是有效的区块,在旧链上,如果按照旧链上更宽松的规则生产出来的区块将有可能在新链上是无效的区块。 硬分叉 硬分叉是一个移除或者放宽共识规则的分叉。在新链上,遵守新规则的区块是有效的区块,只是在新链上有效,并且在旧链上无效,然而旧链生产的区块在新链上是有效的。 小算力(硬/软)分叉 小算力分叉在以下情况下会产生:小算力区块链通过生产不被大算力所接受的区块有意地进行网络分叉。此外,小算力区块链可以任意创造规则,强行使所有未来主链上生产的区块在小算力区块链上是无效的。 大算力(硬/软)分叉 大算力分叉是在以下情况发生: 获得大算力支持的区块链通过发布一个小算力区块链不接受的区块有意地对网络进行分叉。 用户激活软分叉 这种类型的软分叉是在多数用户节点(钱包,全节点)升级到一个可以协调区块高度的软件版本时完成的,这个区块高度会加强特定的新的有效性规则。例如,有一个规则规定,如果一个区块的UXTO集合没有支付到新隔离见证输出的话,那么它就是无效的。这个规则就算没有多数的算力支持,也能执行。总的来说,这是一种特殊的小算力分叉。大算力分叉偏向于获得多数算力支持,UASFs偏向于获得多数经济节点的支持。 这种小算力分叉有生成三种分支的额外风险。因为这种小算力分叉是由节点推动的,这意味着一旦发生了这种分叉,另一个分支将获得大多数算力。作为避免自己不被重组(见如下)的一种反应,多数算力会立刻执行一个大算力软分叉,因而会产生3条区块链:大算力软分叉,小算力软分叉和原始区块链。这种状态是暂时的,因为原来的区块链分叉后最终会被其中一条软分叉区块链超过或者合并/重组。 这种类型的分叉有可能让客户无法看到从交易所提现的过程,给交易所带来售后服务问题。交易所趋向于升级他们的节点以支持两种分支,并确保客户的提款请求通过这个升级节点来进行。支持这项政策隐含的意思是:交易所同意未来分裂比特币产品。这意味着客户必须在交易所的会计系统中创建和持有他们在其他链上的余额。我们建议交易所在进行提款之前完成分裂比特币,以此来避免将账户余额弄混。(见如下分裂比特币的过程) 分叉的技术特点 重组风险 重组风险是在经过分叉后,原来是小算力区块链有可能超过大算力区块链,导致更长区块链回到小算力链上,这会导致这条(大算力)区块链上的从分叉点开始后的所有交易被取消。实际上这就是正常比特币网络的孤块,但一周出现数次几个区块重组并不常见。在分叉后的分支链上发生的重组是单边的,单边是指只会发生在分叉侧或原链侧中的一条链。 由于软分叉的固有特性,即在现有的规则条件下 ,软分叉收紧了区块有效性的规则,所以它会在原始链上带来区块重组的风险。分叉侧永远不会接受原始链的区块。因为原始链区块不符合软分叉的新增规则,所以在分叉侧看来这些原始链新增的区块,是无效的区块。反过来则不成立。因为在分叉侧中,这些符合更多附加规则的区块,显然也符合原始链的规则。所以,有一定的小概率会发生这样的情况:分叉侧区块链的增长速度,可能会超过原始链的增长速度,进而导致原始链上的区块被重组。对于硬分叉,上述情况刚好是反过来的:即只可能会在分叉链上产生重组,而原始链上不会出现区块重组。这是因为分叉链的新增规则,在原始链上是不兼容的。所以,硬分叉只可能有在分叉侧产生区块重组的风险,原始链不会受到影响,即原始链没风险。 这种风险只有一个因素,如果在规则收紧的这条链上有更大追求利润的PoW算力,这超过了原始链的算力,这就导致在这条链上挖到比原始链上更多的连续区块。这时,原始链就必须要考虑重组风险。如果这个风险太大,可以在分叉区块后建立一个一次性的检查点,这就就不会发生重组了。其中一个可行的实现方法是添加一个软分叉规则,这个软分叉可以让任何不包含分叉区块作为其祖先块的区块是无效的。 重组风险是对抗跟随小算力区块链的风险之间的一种平衡。如果一个人总是想要追求最长工作量证明链,那么重组风险是不可避免的。添加一个检查点来避免重组风险,又将引起跟随小算力区块链的风险,并且导致从多数经济侧分离出来。 分离比特币资产 从比特币分叉点后将会可能出现三种类型,分叉前币(pre-fork), 分叉后红币(post-fork […]

Bitcoin Core 0.17.1 Released

bitcoin Core 0.17.1 Released bitcoin Core version 0.17.1 is now available for download containing several bug fixes and minor improvements. For a complete list of changes, please see the release notes. If have any questions, […]