April 5, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Mitsubishi UFJ Bank to Launch Blockchain-Powered Payments Platform in 2020

Mitsubishi UFJ Bank to Launch Blockchain-Powered Payments Platform in 2020

Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG),  the fifth largest bank in the world with more than $2 trillion in assets, is collaborating with Akamai Technologies Inc., to launch a distributed ledger technology (DLT) based payments system called Global Open Network, according to a press release on February 13, 2019.

MUFG and Akamai Launch Blockchain Payments Network

As reported by BTCManager in May 2018, Japan’s largest lender, MUFG announced its strategic partnership with Akamai Technologies, in a bid to launch a payment platform powered by blockchain technology, to facilitate superfast and cost-efficient payments for its clients.

At the time, tha bank stated:

“MUFG and Akamai, via Akamai’s globally deployed high-speed and high-security platform, will use this new blockchain’s high-speed processing and secure value transfer abilities to facilitate pay-per-use, micropayments, and other new IoT generation payment methods, and to support the sharing economy by offering an open platform,”

Fast forward to 2019 and MUFG has made it clear that the proposed blockchain-based payments network will go live in the first half of 2020.

Specifically, the bank has hinted that the new joint venture will take advantage of both its (MUFG) years of experience in the finance industry and Akamai’s “intelligent edge platform” to support a vast array of payment schemes.

Per the team, the Akamai intelligent edge network is the world’s largest and most secure cloud delivery platform, processing more than one million transactions per second.

Akamai to Own 20 Percent of the New Global Open Network

Importantly, MUFG has stated explicitly that the proposed Global Open Network joint venture between it and Akamai will be established in Tokyo.

The DLT-based payments system will have a running capital of JPY 250 million of which Akamai will own 20 percent share of the company while MUFG will control the remaining 80 percent.

A Long Time Coming

Despite the nascent and super volatile nature of blockchain technology and cryptosphere, it worth noting that MUFG has been making serious plans to join the movement for a long time now.

In June 2016, BTCManager informed that MUFG had announced it was looking to launch own virtual currency dubbed, MUFG Coin, to allow its clients to seamlessly withdraw funds from their bank accounts into their smartphone apps at an exchange rate of 1 MUFG coin to 1 Japanese yen.

In related news, in April 2018, reports emerged that MUFG had joined Ripple’s Global Payments Steering Group (GPSG) to enable it to process lightning fast cross-border money transfers.

Like BTCMANAGER? Send us a tip!
Our bitcoin Address: 3AbQrAyRsdM5NX5BQh8qWYePEpGjCYLCy4

Published at Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:00:10 +0000

Previous Article

History of Bitcoin 2009-2018 (Git Visualization)

Next Article

Digitex Futures Public Launch Waitlist Reaches 1 Million Signups

You might be interested in …

SEC/NASAA Ring in 2018 by Hinting at Need for (More) Cryptocurrency Regulation

sec nasaa

Yesterday, January 4, 2018, the three prominent figures of the U.S. Securities and Exchance Commission (SEC) endorsed the concerns raised in the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA)’s cautionary directive on cryptocurrencies, ICOs, and other “Cryptocurrency-Related Investment Products.” Jay Clayton, the Chair of the SEC; Michael Piwowar, the former acting Chair of the SEC; and Kara Stein, a prominent figure in the SEC and an author of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, joined NASAA, the association that is the voice of state securities agencies in the U.S.,  in urging “Main Street investors” to go beyond the headlines and hype to understand cryptocurrency investment risk.

While this is not the first SEC commentary we have seen on cryptocurrencies, this iteration of caution raises the imminent possibility of the SEC and NASAA intervention into the space, as the SEC-lauded directive showed that 94 percent of state and provincial securities regulators (or roughly 63 of the 67 securities regulators under NASAA) believe there is a “high risk of fraud” involving cryptocurrencies and that all of the securities regulators believe “more regulation is needed for cryptocurrency to provide greater investor protection.” 

Of note: Membership in NASAA not only comprises all 50 state securities regulators in the U.S. but also includes securities regulators in Canada and Mexico (as well as the U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. According to Bob Webster, Director of Communications for NASAA, the survey referenced in the directive included NASAA members from the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

The SEC statement by the three most prominent figures in the organization called the NASAA release “a timely and thoughtful reminder,” reminding investors themselves that “when they are offered and sold securities, they are entitled to the benefits of state and federal securities laws.” From a legal standpoint, this comment implies that some or all cryptocurrencies, ICOs and other cryptocurrency-related investment products will be deemed by the SEC as “securities” and that those offering these products may be soon facing accusations of selling unregistered securities in violation of U.S. Securities Laws.

There is a possible point of disparity between the NASAA directive and the coinciding SEC statement: whether cryptocurrencies are “currency.” The usual definition for currency includes the requirements they serve as an accepted medium of exchange and can be a store of value for market participants.

NASAA’s directive states that, “Cryptocurrencies are a medium of exchange that are created and stored electronically in the blockchain, a distributed public database that keeps a permanent record of digital transactions” (emphasis added).

The SEC statement, however, has a slightly different interpretation of the NASAA Directive: that cryptocurrencies “lack many important characteristics of traditional currencies, including sovereign backing and responsibility.” The SEC went further, stating that cryptocurrencies “are now being promoted more as investment opportunities than efficient mediums for exchange.”

This view, unchecked, would allow the SEC to step in to regulate these “investment opportunities.” Whether there was a differing view the SEC wished to convey, or the statement was meant to convey support of the NASAA directive while opening the door for broader SEC intervention into the space, only time will tell.

One final note: FINRA, the non-profit organization authorized by Congress to be regulator in charge in the U.S. for oversight and enforcement actions against broker/dealers on behalf of investor protection, was noticeably silent in joining the SEC and NASAA in issuing a new statement (the previous two warned investors not to fall for cryptocurrency-related stock scams and gave a primer on ICOs).

FINRA Media Relations Specialist, Dylan Menguy, responded to inquiry on FINRA’s view of the statements by the SEC and NASAA by referring bitcoin Magazine to this press release where FINRA warned investors of cryptocurrency-related stock scams.

NASAA’s Bob Webster clarified the survey inclusion as referenced above in the article, and, when asked about the potential disparity discussed above, stated, “…I don’t see a discrepancy between the two views.  Cryptocurrencies are a medium of exchange and they are being promoted as investment opportunities. For clarification on the SEC’s position, you should contact the SEC.”

At the time of this writing, the SEC has not responded to a request for comment.


The post SEC/NASAA Ring in 2018 by Hinting at Need for (More) Cryptocurrency Regulation appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.