May 7, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Litecoin Price Loses 13% yet Long-term Uptrend Remains Intact

Litecoin price loses 13% yet long-term uptrend remains intact

Litecoin Price Loses 13% yet Long-term Uptrend Remains Intact

Litecoin price loses 13% yet long-term uptrend remains intact


Bearish momentum can affect all major cryptocurrencies when people least expect it. As far as the current trend is concerned, it was a mere matter of time until the momentum soured. All markets are getting battered right now, with the Litecoin price losing nearly 12% in very quick succession. Turning this ship around will prove rather difficult.

Litecoin Price Heads Below $85 Again

A lot of cryptocurrency traders keep a small amount of Litecoin as part of their portfolio. In this volatile industry, diversification is key at all times. Although the Litecoin value surpassed $90 earlier in the week, it has now dropped down to $83 again. This sharp correction was somewhat to be expected, albeit it may not necessarily remain in place for very long.

The Litecoin price is currently subjected to a near 12% decline in USD value and a 6.8% loss in BTC value. As such, one LTC is priced at $83, or 0017 bitcoin. Both of these levels are still more than significant, primarily because one LTC was valued a lot lower when the year 2019 came around. It is always pertinent to keep the bigger picture in mind when it comes to cryptocurrencies as a whole or on an individual basis.

On social media, there is never a shortage of interesting discussions pertaining to cryptocurrencies. JohnKimoOfficial sees a clear Litecoin uptrend over the past few months. It is certainly true the current value is still a near 300% increase compared to January 1st, thus it seems there is no reason to panic by any means.


Plenty of LTC price charts can be found on Twitter right now, although most of them offer some conflicting information. Dan C expects this retrace to continue all the way down to $72 or potentially even lower. That seems a bit steep, although it will primarily depend on what happens to bitcoin over the coming hours and days.

It would seem Crypto Eraser has a completely different opinion as to where LTC will be heading next. There is some solid support in place above $80, and there is no volume nor wick to speak of at this time. That doesn’t mean the downtrend won’t be extended, but for now, it seems the hourly candles are showing bullish signals again.

When looking at the bigger picture, all of the top markets still hold on to their gains accumulated in the past few days. Some of those profits are no longer in play, but the overall trend remains intact, for the time being. There is a genuine chance all markets will rebound in the coming days, albeit that will primarily depend on bitcoin’s momentum. For now, the world’s leading cryptocurrency is still in an uncertain state.


Disclaimer: This is not trading or investment advice. The above article is for entertainment and education purposes only. Please do your own research before purchasing or investing into any cryptocurrency.

Image(s): Shutterstock.com

Published at Thu, 04 Apr 2019 19:59:43 +0000

Previous Article

Tom Lee: Bitcoin ‘Fair Value’ is $14,000 Right Now

Next Article

Andreas M. Antonopoulos on What Happens When Bitcoin Takes Over

You might be interested in …

ICO Haven Sent Packing; Singapore follows SEC Lead to Regulate Securities-type Token Sales

Exactly one week ago, the SEC issued a report concluding that certain token sales could be considered securities, and hence were subject to regulation. Today, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) issued a similar statement, clarifying that, in some cases, Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) were essentially equivalent to securities, and should fall under the same regulatory procedures.


I can’t help but feel slightly responsible. After all, just five days before the SEC report was published, I wrote an article describing many of the recent ICOs as tantamount to “buying shares in a stranger’s start-up.”

Oops!

SEC Issues Warning for ICO Organizers and Investors

Say What Now?

Sure, the SEC report was a direct response to the hack on the Ethereum side project, the DAO hub, almost a year ago… So I guess that can’t be my fault, but the timing is more than a little suspicious, wouldn’t you say?

Okay, the SEC focussed more on the risks to investors, and (quite rightly IMHO) ascertained this. If the token issued is promising to give investors a return (i.e. dividend), then it should fall under the realm of the SEC, and be subject to regulation. These rules are there to protect investors, so really it would be churlish of us to complain.

They also decided that they wouldn’t press charges at this point, but that future ICOs should be wary of where the often hazy line is drawn. Many token sales already prohibit U.S. citizens from participating for just this reason, so it’s not something we weren’t already aware of.

But Singapore? They Were Like… Totally Chill Man!

Well, yes and no. Singapore’s recent experiments with the tokenization of its currency were seen as an implicit embracing of all things crypto, with local authorities stating that they don’t consider digital tokens as securities. However, this is also the place where you can be fined $100,000 dollars and spend two years in jail for chewing gum.

The report is very clear and states:

The function of digital tokens has evolved beyond just being a virtual currency. […] Where digital tokens fall within the definition of securities in the SFA, issuers of such tokens would be required to lodge and register a prospectus with MAS prior to the offer of such tokens

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

So the Party’s Over?

No. Not by a long shot. Both the SEC and MAS reports specifically stop short of claiming that all cryptocurrency tokens and ICOs will fall within their remit. The MAS explicitly states that their “position of not regulating virtual currencies is similar to that of most jurisdictions.”

As would be expected, no specific definition is provided as far as what will or will not count as a security. But implicit in these reports is the assertion that this isn’t going to affect your bitcoin, or your Ether, or your Just-doing-this-for-a-joke-Coin, whatever.

If a coin functions as a coin, then it should be fine. If a coin functions as a token for the purchase of service or product within an eventual eco-system, then that should also be fine.

If a coin is promising dividends based on a company’s profitability, then… yeah. If it sounds like a share in a stranger’s start-up…

But… but… but…

Let me repeat once again that these regulations are here to protect us, the investors.

Yes, our eyes may spin like a cartoon character’s until the pupils resemble dollar signs at the mere thought of that near-mythical level of profit that a friend of a friend down the pub told us about but we would all be sick to our stomachs to find out that the ICO we just plowed our hard-won life-savings into was just an elaborate Ponzi scheme after all.

To ignore the risk of one for the sake of the other would make us not investors. It would simply make us gamblers.

What do you think of the SEC and MAS’ recent reports? Will it have an impact on which ICOs you choose to invest in? Have you found yourself frozen out of an ICO because of where you live? Let us know in the comments below.


Images courtesy of Wikimedia Commons, Fotolia

The post ICO Haven Sent Packing; Singapore follows SEC Lead to Regulate Securities-type Token Sales appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.