September 14, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Internxt Added to Coinbase Wallet, Boasts Robust Price Surge

CoinSpeaker
Internxt Added to Coinbase Wallet, Boasts Robust Price Surge

CoinSpeaker
Internxt Added to Coinbase Wallet, Boasts Robust Price Surge

All members of the crypto community (no matter whether they are active participants or silent observers) know how quickly the crypto market reacts to different changes and how vulnerable it is to various factors.

Blockchain-based startup Internxt, that is trying to build the internet of new generation with the help of the decentralized cloud technology, has announced that its native Internxt tokens (INXT) now can be stored in Coinbase wallet.

According to the strartup’s team, the X Cloud platform that they are building is able to guarantee total security of all stored data and files, 100% privacy and easy usage, leaving such giants as iCloud, Google Drive, OneDrive and Dropbox aside and taking their place. The platform’s token is intended to be used for payments for its services.

The startup has taken a decision to make an option to store INXT in private wallets available for all cryptocurrency holders with a view to provide them with a safer alternatinve to holding assets directly in an exchange’s wallet. When traders have their own wallets, only they themselves are in control of their holdings, while in the second situation a third party manages them.

This news was announced on November, 2 which has immediately boosted the market.

Market Reaction

The price for INXT is continuously growing. On November, 5 INXT made headlines once again. Over the previous 24 hours it gained 29.4% against the dollar, while over the previous seven-day period it managed to gain almost 40% against the fiat.

At the press time INXT is traded for $2,87 USD having gained 19,61% over the last 24 hours. A total market cap amounts to $1.8 million and approximately $11,000 worth of INXT was traded during the last 24-hour period.

After the news about a new opportunity to store INXT in Coinbase Wallet, traders definitely have started to show more interest in holding this cryptocurrency which has resulted into an active growth of its value.

Nevertheless, it’s worth mentioning that it is not the first case of movement up demonstrated by Internxt token this autumn

Previous Growth

In September, as it was reported by CoinSpeaker, while the first decentralized internet service X Cloud was gaining popularity, the price of its native token was going up as well. At that time, following the release of the platform’s Beta version, the token was traded for approximately $3 but it was gaining not so quickly if compared with the pace we observe today.

However, today’s growth can’t be considered to be a record for INXT. Last December it took less than a month for the price to increase by 600% and reach $25,23 when the community was waiting for X Cloud Alpha version. Since that time INXT has experienced several ups and downs and now it’s up again.

Internxt Added to Coinbase Wallet, Boasts Robust Price Surge

bitcoin News
Bitfury Secures $80M in Private Placement
Bitfury secures $80m in private placement

Bitfury Group, the San Francisco-based manufacturer of bitcoin mining hardware, announced today that it has closed an $80 million private placement funding round. This may indicate that the company, which was rumored to be working on an initial public offering, has decided to delay taking the IPO route for now.

Also Read: Lawyer Invests $300 Million to Build Crypto City in the Nevada Desert

‘Incredible Expansion’

Bitfury secures $80m in private placementInstitutional and corporate investors from Europe, Asia and the U.S. participated in Bitfury’s $80 million private placement, led by Korelya Capital, the European arm of South Korea’s Naver Group. Participants also included Macquarie Capital, Dentsu, Armat Group, Jabre and Lian Group, Argenthal Capital Partners, MACSF, Mike Novogratz’s Galaxy Digital, and itech Capital. Investment bank Bryan, Garnier & Co. advised Bitfury on the process.

“2018 has been a year of incredible expansion for Bitfury. This private placement reflects our achievements, and it recognizes our ability to address adjacent market segments in high-performance computing, including in emerging technologies like artificial intelligence,” said Valery Vavilov, CEO and co-founder of Bitfury. “The institutionalization of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, partnered with the opportunity of these emerging technologies, is a natural expansion opportunity that Bitfury will build on  —  in 2019 and beyond.”

What About the IPO?

Bitfury secures $80m in private placementIt has long been expected that Bitfury would eventually seek an IPO. And only last month it was reported that the company had been in contact with a number of investment banks about the possibility of taking its business public by next year. This was meant to be at an expected valuation of between $3 billion to $5 billion, based on about half a billion dollars in yearly revenues.

The move would have made Bitfury the first European company in the space to do so and would have enabled it to raise public funds needed to fend off competition from Asian manufacturers such as Canaan Creative, Ebang Communication and above all Bitmain Technologies. But by deciding to go with a private placement instead, Bitfury might be signalling that it is willing to wait for a better opportunity to go public in a more bullish market down the line.

“This private placement will take our corporate governance to the next level, broaden our financial strategic options, and ideally position us for our next phase of growth as the market matures,” said George Kikvadze, executive vice chairman of Bitfury.

What can we learn about the direction of the market from this investment? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock.

Verify and track bitcoin cash transactions on our BCH Block Explorer, the best of its kind anywhere in the world. Also, keep up with your holdings, BCH and other coins, on our market charts at Satoshi’s Pulse, another original and free service from bitcoin.com.

The post Bitfury Secures $80M in Private Placement appeared first on Bitcoin News.

Previous Article

Apple Removes Crypto Podcast Reportedly Ranked #4 in ‘Investing’ From US iTunes Store

Next Article

Ethereum [ETH] can act as an equipment for the next big economic crisis, says economist |

You might be interested in …

Software Engineer – Blockchain

Software Engineer – Blockchain A crowd funding blockchain. General understanding of blockchain concepts is a plus. This blockchain is anticipating handling 10^5 – 10^6 transactions per second… Object Computing Inc.St. Louis, MO From Object Computing […]

Op Ed: User Activated Soft Forks and the Intolerant Minority

Op Ed: User Activated Soft Forks and the Intolerant Minority

It does not take a majority to prevail … but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.
Samuel Adams

In The Most Intolerant Wins: The Dictatorship of the Small Minority, Nassim Nicholas Taleb describes how a strong enough minority with more strict preferences can end up with the majority following their preferences. He speaks of many examples  —  food preparation standards, languages and taboos.

This principle can also extend to bitcoin and the concept of soft forks. By extending this principle, it can show that a soft fork that has strong support from a minority still may be enough to provide economic incentives to its enforcement, even if the majority is ambivalent.

Soft forks, by their nature, are a form of intolerance. Users who enforce a soft fork are intolerant of some types of transactions or blocks that miners can produce. They will reject those blocks that miners produce much as an Orthodox Jew will reject pork. In cases where the majority is ambivalent and the cost for producers is low to adhere to the stricter standards, then the result is producers keep everyone happy by following those stricter standards.

In bitcoin’s case, many potential soft forks fall into this category. Soft forks that do not degrade the security properties of bitcoin, that do not take away from any currently used features, do not add costs to miners, and are preferred by some, would result in profit-maximizing miners choosing to serve a wider audience by enforcing the soft fork.

Strong-Willed Minority vs. Ambivalent Majority

In the above case, if there were strong believers committed to a soft fork with stricter rules, miners face a choice  —  do they allow the chain to split or serve everyone with the new stricter rules? If they allow the chain to split, they must pick a subset of users to serve, giving them less value than if they were to serve all. This also harms the network effect, which means the sum of the two parts is now worth less than the original. Thus, as long as the minority committed to the soft fork was sufficient in size that they cannot be ignored, a profit-maximizing miner will follow them (assuming there is little to no cost of enforcement).

Strong-Willed Minority vs. Miners’ Interests

In a case where a strong-willed minority requires non-GMO, organically certified food, this may not result in the minority getting its way. The cost of production may be too high to be worth it. A theoretical soft fork that reduces the block reward by half would be a good example. A minority may feel the block reward is too high and wish that it be lowered, and only allow miners to claim 6.25 coins instead of 12.5 per block. In this case, miners would give up a significant amount of income to have to enforce it, and the loss of “business” from excluding these users may be less costly than reducing their income.

Strong-Willed Minority vs. Strong-Willed Minority

A third case is when a strong-willed majority ends up alienating another portion of the potential consumers. If a new religious sect required that all food have bacon added to it, Jews and Muslims would not tolerate this and would splinter off, even if the majority did not care either way. In this case, a split is inevitable.

In the bitcoin case, some users may wish to have all addresses logged in a government registry to ease KYC compliance. They could demand that miners only mine blocks that adhere to these standards. This type of action would be rejected by many users who would not go along with such a plan, and in fact may even take steps to block it if it was enforced. In this case, a split would be inevitable if both factions were sufficiently intolerant of the other.

The Importance of Commitment and Stubbornness

This only works if users are absolutely committed to their rules being followed. Commitment must be absolute and unwilling to change, no matter what the majority does. The most important part of the intolerant minority is to truly be intolerant! If the cause is not worth putting your neck on the line for, it will not be successful.

Some supporters of user-activated soft forks (UASFs) have stated that they intend to enforce the UASF unless it is not widely supported or followed, and then would back off. This is the surest way to guarantee failure. If you are unwilling to follow a minority chain with an economic minority, you aren’t truly an intolerant minority. You are only one with a preference.

Guidelines for User-Activated Soft Forks for Maximizing Success

  • Take away no existing useful features (do not create a hostile minority).

  • Do not add significant costs to miners (make burden for miners as low as possible).

  • Include functionality that users are willing to fork off for.

  • Ensure there is a sufficiently sized minority willing to commit.

A sufficiently sized, committed, economic minority is enough to have a successful user-activated soft fork. While Shaolinfry said that without an economic majority behind a soft fork, it should be withdrawn, I believe that statement to be too weak. The history of intolerant minorities making changes is long enough to show otherwise.

This guest post by Alphonse Pace was originally published on Medium and is reproduced here under Creative Commons license. Some rights reserved. The views expressed do not necessarily represent those of bitcoin Magazine.

The post Op Ed: User Activated Soft Forks and the Intolerant Minority appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.