January 27, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Infographic: An Overview of Compromised ₿itcoin Exchange Events

Infographic: an overview of compromised ₿itcoin exchange events

Infographic: An Overview of Compromised ₿itcoin Exchange Events

The purpose of this infographic is to visualize the size of large cryptocurrency hacks that have occurred in the past as if they all happened today. The hacks included in this infographic extend beyond exchanges, as there were other large entities that experienced cryptocurrency hacks, such as marketplaces like Silk Road 2.0. All hacks in this infographic are displayed as if the price of ₿itcoin was the same when they occurred, in order to visualize their magnitudes in relation to one another.

The x-axis shows the price of ₿itcoin at the time of the hack. The y-axis shows the amount lost in the hack (converted to BTC for altcoin hacks). The size of each hack circle was determined by the value of BTC lost using a consistent price, regardless of the actual price at the time.

It is important to note that several of the exchanges (rendered in green) were hacks that did not necessarily involve ₿itcoin or exclusively involve ₿itcoin.

An overview of compromised ₿itcoin exchange events

Mt. Gox

Hack Dates: June 2011, February 2014

Amount Lost: 790,000+ BTC

In March 2014, Mt. Gox declared bankruptcy due to a series of hacks and thefts that went unreported for over three years, which were later documented by blockchain analyst Kim Nilsson. The final collapse resulted in a crash of ₿itcoin in 2014. Below is a summary of all meaningful hacks that occured.

On March 1, 2011, 80,000 BTC were stolen from Mt. Gox’s hot wallet, as thieves were able to make a copy of the wallet.dat file. In May 2011, hackers stole 300,000 BTC temporarily stored on an off-site wallet, which was on an unsecured, publicly accessible network drive. However, shortly after, the thief got nervous and returned the stolen funds with a 1 percent (3,000 BTC) “keeper’s fee.” In June 2011, a hacker was able to get into Jed McCaleb’s administrator account and manipulate prices, temporarily crashing the market. After the ordeal was over, the hacker managed to steal 2,000 BTC.

In September 2011, a hacker was able to get read-write access to Mt. Gox’s database. The hacker created new accounts on the exchange, inflated user balances and was able to withdraw 77,500 BTC, after which they deleted most of the logs containing evidence of such transactions. In October 2011, a bug in Mark Karpeles’ new wallet software caused 2,609 BTC to be sent to an unspendable null key. The largest hack occurred at some point between September and October 2011 when a hacker was able to obtain a copy of Mt. Gox’s wallet.dat file and stole 630,000 BTC.

Bitcoinica

Hack Date: March 1, 2012

Amount Lost: 43,000 BTC and then another 18,457 BTC

Web hosting provider Linode’s servers were hacked, granting access to the ₿itcoin stored on pioneering exchange ₿itcoinica. The incidents ultimately led to the demise of ₿itcoinica.

BitFloor

Hack Date: September 2012

Amount Lost: 24,000 BTC

BitFloor was compromised when a hacker was able to access unencrypted backups of the exchange’s wallets and transfer out the coins.

Poloniex

  • Hack Date: March 4, 2014
  • Amount Lost: 97 BTC
  • In March 2014, Poloniex announced that it has been the victim of an attack due to a previously unknown vulnerability in its coding. As a result, the exchange told all of its customers that it would have their account balances reduced by 12.3 percent.

Bitstamp

Hack Date: January 2015

Amount Lost: 19,000 BTC

Hackers were able to access Bitstamp’s hot wallet. As a result of the theft, Bitstamp began to keep 98 percent of its ₿itcoins in cold storage.

Cryptsy

Hack Date: July 2014

Amount Lost: 13,000 BTC

In early 2016, Cryptsy collapsed following the theft of 13,000 BTC (and 30,000 LTC) from customers’ wallets.

Bitfinex

Hack Date: August 2016

Amount Lost: 120,000 BTC

Attackers were able to exploit a vulnerability in the multisig wallet architecture of Bitfinex and blockchain security company BitGo.

QuadrigaCX

Shutdown: January 15, 2019

Amount Lost: Approximately $190 million in BTC, ETH and CAD (at time of publication)

The co-founder of QuadrigaCX died on December 9, 2018, allegedly as the only one with access to the exchange’s keys. Evolving courtroom proceedings have revealed fund mismanagement and potential fraud on the part of the exchange. This has led to calls for greater oversight of exchange operations.

2018’s Cluster of Mishaps in Asia

A cluster of hacks and mismanagement of funds by exchanges in 2018 occurred as the result of minimal regulation and security precautions. Consequently, some exchanges were forced to close operations entirely while others received fines.

Coincheck (Japan)

Hack Date: January 2018

Amount Lost: 523 million NEM

Coinrail (South Korea)

Hack Date: June 2018

Amount Lost: $40 million in various cryptocurrencies

On July 15, 2018, Coinrail resumed trading and offered the victims two compensation options: a gradual refund through the purchase of stolen cryptocurrency or compensation in Coinrail’s RAIL tokens, which could then be converted into another cryptocurrency at an inner rate.

BitHumb (South Korea)

Hack Date: June 2018

Amount Lost: $30 million in various cryptocurrencies

The successful hack of BitHumb occurred shortly after the exchange updated its security systems following an earlier hack in 2017.

Decentralized Exchanges

Bancor

Hack Date: July 9, 2018

Amount Lost: $23 million (mostly in ETH)

Hackers were able to gain control of a Bancor exchange wallet and transfer out funds.

BitGrail

Hack Date: February 21, 2018

Amount Lost: $170 million in XRB, now NANO

Following this hack, authorities in Florence confiscated all of the cryptocurrency from the Italian exchange BitGrail to secure the claim of affected users, and the Nano Foundation promised to assist in the protection of interests and compensation for losses. Users accused the exchange of having lax security.

MyBitcoin

Hack Date: July 2011

Amount Lost: 78,739 BTC

Little information was released about the MyBitcoin theft, however, many argue that operator Tom Williams ran it as a scam. The theft resulted in the closure of MyBitcoin, which was once a successful ₿itcoin company in the cryptocurrency’s early days.

Bitomat.pl

Hack Date: July 27 2011

Amount Lost: Approximately 17,000 BTC

During a server restart, the remote Amazon service that housed Bitomat.pl’s wallet was wiped. No backups were kept and Mt. Gox later bailed Bitomat.pl out. Ultimately, neither exchange customers nor original owners suffered any loss from the incident.

Evolution Darknet Marketplace

Hack Date: March 2015

Amount Lost: Approximately 44,000 BTC

In March 2015, Evolution Marketplace administrators “Kimble” and “Verto” were suspected of unexpectedly shutting down Evolution, a darknet marketplace that appeared after the seizure of Silk Road 2.0, and vanishing from the internet with all user funds.

Silk Road 2.0

Hack Date: February 2014

Amount Lost: Approximately 4,400 BTC

Defcon, an administrator at underground marketplace Silk Road 2.0, noticed that funds held for the escrow service were stolen from a hot wallet in February 2014. “Transaction malleability,” an issue with the ₿itcoin protocol at the time that also affected some other services, was blamed for the theft, though many suspect it was an inside job.

Published at Fri, 24 May 2019 18:56:03 +0000

Previous Article

Bitcoin Core 0.18.0 Released

Next Article

Enjincraft: Enjin Brings Blockchain Economies to Minecraft

You might be interested in …

Video-Empfehlung der Woche: Magical Crypto Friends

BTC-ECHO Video-Empfehlung der Woche: Magical Crypto Friends Die Videoempfehlung dieser Woche dreht sich indirekt wieder um Samson Mow. Gemeinsam mit Charlie Lee, Riccardo Spagni und Whalepanda diskutiert er in der jüngsten Folge der Show “Magical […]

Blockstack Announces Its Own Token Sale

Blockstack token

New York–based decentralized internet and developer platform Blockstack has announced its own token sale.

Blockstack recently partnered with a number of venture capital groups to launch the $25 million Blockstack Signature fund. The group also released the “Blockstack Token Whitepaper,” which explains the technical details of the Blockstack Token mining system, the incentive mechanisms and genesis block.

The white paper highlights that the traditional internet is a 40-year-old technology that was originally meant to be a decentralized network. Even though the lower layers of the internet remain fairly decentralized, the application layer of the internet has several centralized points of control and failure. This is what Blockstack intends to solve.

The paper presents Stack, a blockchain token protocol that upgrades the Blockstack blockchain and introduces decentralized governance and incentive mechanisms for a decentralized app ecosystem. Stack enables several new features such as atomic swaps and support for light clients, and it introduces a novel mining mechanism.

Muneeb Ali, co-founder at Blockstack, told bitcoin Magazine: “The Blockstack Token is introducing incentive mechanisms for developers and users to participate in an ecosystem of decentralized apps. Our token white paper describes a novel mining system where in addition to a mining mechanism that secures the blockchain, there is a mechanism for app developers and early users to get new tokens released into the system. We believe that these built-in incentive mechanisms can play a critical role in sustainable growth of the ecosystem.”

Ali added: “In addition, the token enables decentralized governance for protocol upgrades and enables new features like support for truly independent mobile clients, atomic swaps and more.”

The group founders explained in a press release that their primary goal for the Blockstack token sale event is to achieve a wide distribution of tokens. They believe token holders are the “economic stakeholders” of the ecosystem, and that it’s important that the economic distribution represents a broad community.

Highlights of the Blockstack token sale:

  • Everyone will participate at the same time and get the same price.

  • There will be no variable prices during the sale, just a single, constant price.

  • There is no pre-sale or discounts for the upcoming token sale.

  • Existing shareholders of Blockstack PBC purchased tokens allocated for the “Creators” earlier in a separate offering.

  • No other party can buy current or future tokens until the sale opens.

  • Unaccredited users, accredited investors and qualified purchasers can participate in the sale at the same terms.

  • Unaccredited users will get a “voucher” that they can bring back to finish the transaction and will make the payment at a later date.


For more details, see Blockstack’s announcement on their blog.

The post Blockstack Announces Its Own Token Sale appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.

Propy - buy california land that nobody wants

PROPY – Buy California Land That Nobody Wants

PROPY – Buy California Land That Nobody Wants 🚀 Get the Apps! ★ http://cryptoyum.com ★ http://coinpuffs.com There’s a lot of land out west but no one appears to want it? // GET STARTED 🚀 Become […]