July 12, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

How GOOD were Onix & Steelix ACTUALLY? – History of Onix & Steelix in Competitive Pokemon (Gens 1-6)

How good were onix & steelix actually? - history of onix & steelix in competitive pokemon (gens 1-6)

How GOOD were Onix & Steelix ACTUALLY? – History of Onix & Steelix in Competitive Pokemon (Gens 1-6)

How good were onix & steelix actually? - history of onix & steelix in competitive pokemon (gens 1-6)ONIX & STEELIX! Brock’s stone behemoth of a Pokemon! Was Onix really as threatening as it was in the anime? Should Brock have evolved Onix into Steelix? Join False Swipe Gaming on this brief overview of competitive Onix & Steelix competitive Pokemon!

Link to Adib’s Fullmetal Steelix Article: http://nuggetbridge.com/reports/fullmetal-steelix-10th-place-us-nationals-report/

Results from the 2013 US Pokémon Video Game National Championships

Other stuff involving mega steelix in vgc:

Metal Detecting: A VGC ’15 Overview of Steel-type Pokémon

A Major Accomplishment: The Champion’s Journey Through the Season 4 Nugget Bridge Major

A Heart Remade Fullmetal: 2014 US Nationals Runner-up Report

What’s Protect? A US Nationals 1st Place Report

PATREON!: If you want to support FSG even more or just feeling generous, please go here!: https://www.patreon.com/falseswipegaming

Aldaron’s Proposal Info Links:
http://www.smogon.com/smog/issue28/proposal
http://www.smogon.com/forums/threads/weather-abilities-but-mostly-drizzle.84966/

The Official False Swipe Gaming Twitter:

Directed & Edited by Kellen

Follow Me On Twitch!: http://www.twitch.tv/kellen_fsg

Sound Edited by Ryan Gonzales
http://ryangonzalesfilmmaker.weebly.com/

Written By
Zane Bhansali aka Epengu
Follow Him: https://twitter.com/epengu

DISCLAIMERS ON FORMATS COVERED:

Notice I said POPULAR formats, meaning a format where there is a significant amount of people who compete in it for tournaments and so on and so forth. Now Popular does not mean official even though two of the formats I will be covering were official formats being Japan Nintendo Cup and VGC, but it is an indicator of what a good portion of competitive players thought was “optimal” at the time. Also sometimes the Pokemon Battle Historia doesn’t provide enough information to talk about certain Pokemon so I add Smogon analysis to make sense of it. This is pretty rare though.

To the people asking why I don’t cover Smogon Singles for Gens 1 and 2: It wouldn’t really be a history video if I covered those because online Smogon gen 1 meta to my knowledge wasn’t actually played until late 2000s. I wanted to cover tournaments/competitive battling that was actually played during the early years of Pokemon (late 90s).

To the people asking why I cover Smogon at all for singles: To my knowledge, Smogon was the most popular format for Gens 3-5 and held a number of tournaments throughout the years. As for Gen 6, I am not covering Battle Spot Singles because there is more information and explanations about sets being used relative to their own meta on Smogon. In other words, there are few written analyses about Battle Spot Pokemon besides the Top tiers and I would like to avoid theorycrafting because it may have a hint of bias (though I theorycraft if I REALLY couldn’t find information on a certain Pokemon). The keyword here is explanations. Though I did find statistics of most Pokemon used and most moves used, there wasn’t really any explanations on why. Also the few Pokemon I did find analysis of for Top Tier Battle Spot Singles had very similar move sets to the Smogon OU sets anyway.

For the record, I do not care what rules or formats people play their battles by nor am I saying these formats are the only formats that should be played. The way you play Pokemon is between you and your opponent and I will not fault you for using evasion or whatever, I just like examining popular tournament formats.

Song Used:
See End of Video

My Twitter:

Resources and Historical References

History of Rule Variants: http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Rule_variants#Nintendo_Cup_.2799

Smogon University:
http://www.smogon.com/

Maikiri

Aaron Cybertron Zheng:

Pokeaim

Pokemon Battle Historia:
http://pokemon.s20.xrea.com/

Nintendo Cup 2000 Team Construction:
http://pokemon.s20.xrea.com/2nd/construction.html

Nintendo Cup 2000 Tier List:
http://pokemon.s20.xrea.com/2nd/2000/

FULL RESEARCH SOURCES HERE:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15o6osR13U9w9jGmhcKlHlHveqBrLdg-SHhuSSQBirG8/edit?usp=sharing

Pokemon Japanese Battle Wiki:
http://wiki.xn--rckteqa2e.com/wiki/%E3%83%A1%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3%E3%83%9A%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8

Sprites From:
https://www.spriters-resource.com/
https://pldh.net/dex/sprites/index

Previous Article

Bitcoin Shirt HODL • Cryptocurrency shirt • Cryptocurrency tshirt • Shirt Bitcoin • Ethereum tshirt • Bitcoin tshirt • Bitcoin t shirt

Next Article

KIN Token Could Be Next To Moon Shot in 2018

You might be interested in …

Why The Bitcoin Miners Are Destined To Lose The Hard Fork Wars

Excuse me for indulging myself, but there are many points of view towards what may be an impending hard fork for bitcoin. This may come across as a loosely coherent ramble, but at least it is short and sweet. There is enough here to put it on wax, so here’s what I see, in the big picture.


This is in response to the Medium post created by Peter Rizun yesterday, outlining how this hard fork may play out, and essentially showing a way BTU wins, in the long run. (Roger Ver tweeted his support for this post, so I read it and posted most of these thoughts in the comments section, and here we are.)

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

In my humble opinion, the problem I see coming is if BCU breaks off, it will become an altcoin, as has been established by the bitcoin exchange establishment. These miners can mine all the blocks they want, if the greater community doesn’t trust their developers, doesn’t want an altcoin, and isn’t buying BCU, it is irrelevant by design.

The market will decide who wins, and anybody who is not a miner wants to stick with Core and their chain. The miners are one thing, the market is something else. The miners might win a battle, but they would lose that war. They should keep that in mind.

Without those miners, BTC would definitely take a hit, but the Core developers could then quickly move to a 2MB upgrade and get SegWit and The Lightning Network approved, creating greater bitcoin functionality, from a trusted group of developers, and an incredible upside in off-chain scalability that an on-chain approach would be hard pressed to match. All without the centralization and control of the miners.

segwit-logo

Users will follow anyone who is going to implement SegWit. The market is sold on this concept as a boon to bitcoin functionality. BTU has not done a very good sales job at all regarding their position. Scaling away from miners will hurt mining, but it will let bitcoin reach its full potential.

BTU needs to sell their mined Bitcoins to a market. I’m not seeing much of a market for BTU, outside of the miners and BTU investors, themselves. The miners do not control bitcoin, and even Core does not control bitcoin. Maybe, just maybe, The People control bitcoin’s future growth? Anyone who thinks the market doesn’t have a handle on who each side is looking out for here is fooling themselves.

Just seeing how the community is responding, keeping my ear to the ground, the greater community will not follow the miners, who are primarily looking to turn a digital buck in bitcoin. They will follow Core, who is looking after the greater good. Miners will lose that tug of war.

Bitcoin miners vs Bitcoin core

It has become clear that BTU developers cannot replace BTC developers, as the recent bugs have shown the world, but BTC miners can be replaced. There are plenty of people around the world who want that job, and can do it just as well.

This power struggle is really temporary in nature. People will not follow miners looking for profit first, and who want to hijack the entire system, from now on, in order to get it. That is not leadership.

At the end of the day, The People will decide to back Core. The only question is when will the dissenting miners, clouded by visions of endless bitcoin profiteering, figure this fact out?

If the miners didn’t get the memo, that the vast majority of the market will stick with Core and not dump BTC for any BTU altcoin, use this. Like bitcoin itself, it’s far from perfect, but it’ll do just fine.

How do you think a hard fork would play out? Should there be an increase in block size? Let us know what you think below!


Images courtesy of bitcoin Core, AdobeStock

The post Why The Bitcoin Miners Are Destined To Lose The Hard Fork Wars appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.