hi! thanks for the step by step explanation above on how to export nem wallet address to nano wallet. Why is it that the nano wallet address that appears is 4 character lesser than that of the one i exported? i submitted to Loyalcoin the one from Nem wallet address, will there be a problem with it since there is a little bit difference between the two? thank you for your response.
Your time has come : be the next biggest influencer by acquiring YouTuber cards (a.k.a. YTIcons) on the Ethereum Blockchain.
YTIcons is an online and blockchain-based collectible game allowing anyone with an Ethereum wallet to buy and own a collectible, evolutive and valuable YouTuber card.
Every YTIcon is a unique Smart Contract that can be sold, bought and collected : as soon as you purchase the latter, its price is automatically increased and you take ownership of the YTIcon until someone else buys it back. By selling a YTIcon, you will lose the ownership but you will be paid up to the double* of what you originally invested and the ETH you rightly deserve will automatically be transferred to your wallet.

Also, we are proud to be the first game of its kind to implement evolutive cards : all of the YTIcons’ statistics (number of followers, number of views…) are regularly updated to match the related YouTuber ones. That being said, every YTIcon has a type and every type has its unique design defined by the related YouTuber’s number of followers.

YTIcons has recently launched its one-of-a-kind leaderboard. For every transaction, 1% of the YTIcon’s price is transferred to an utility fund especially created for the community. In a defined period of time, the community is given a new goal (e.g. “Gather as many followers as possible”) and once the event comes to an end, the best ranked users are given a reward drawn from the utility fund but also* YTIcons (1st : 2 YTIcons with a value of 0.5 eth, 2nd : 1 YTIcon with a value of 0.5 eth, 3rd : 1 YTIcon with a value of 0.25 eth)

Moreover, at the end of every event, a lottery is setup to reward users who did not necessarily get enough cards to be in the top ranking. Excluding the top 3 users, a draw is done to pick a YTIcon’s owner and give him 10% of the utility fund and a YTIcon with a value of 0.1 ETH.
Before starting YTIcons' development, we decided to take a percentage of every unverified* YTIcon's transaction (3%) for something that matters to us : Charity. The donations are directly stored — through our Smart Contract — to an address available .
Every time a change has been decided or when a donation has been done through this address, we will notify our community through our Twitter to let them to track it off thanks to the Blockchain.
We want our community to be aware of everything related to the charities and this is why we engage ourselves to provide our users updates following every transaction done through this wallet and evidences once the Ether has been donated.

Finally, one of our current concerns is to not overload the market because we want to let all of the YTIcons get their opportunity to shine but also because we want to provide our community satisfying drops. Consequently, a limited amount of YTIcons has been released until now.
On Monday, April 2nd at 7:00PM UTC time, we started a special launching week and numerous YTIcons have already been released. Therefore, from this date, two new YTIcons will regularly enter the marketplace and thus, every 12 hours ! Do not miss the next drop, take over the ranking and stay at the top !
For more informations and to stay updated :
Website : Discord : Twitter : Facebook : Email : contact@yticons.co

The integrity and reliability of has once again been questioned, following a massive blow that the blockchain suffered from hackers which is not the first of its kind.
A currency which taunts itself as being a “secure and anonymous”, telling people that “privacy has a choice” yesterday fell into the bait of hackers, where a malicious miner took over 51% of the network’s Hashrate.
The Wednesday April 4, attack was made known on a , by a regular poster who stated that about 250,000 verge was carted away.
The attack, according to the forum was made possible due to the availability of some bugs in the altcoin’s code, giving the hackers the possibility to mine new blocks with a spoofed timestamp using the same algorithm.
“Usually to successfully mine XVG blocks, every “next” block must be of a different algo.. so for example scrypt,then x17, then lyra etc”.
“Due to several bugs in the XVG code, you can exploit this feature by mining blocks with a spoofed timestamp. When you submit a mined block (as a malicious miner or pool) you simply set a false timestamp to this block one hour ago and XVG will then “think” the last block mined on that algo was one hour ago.. Your next block, the subsequent block will then have the correct time.. And since it’s already an hour ago (at least that is what the network thinks) it will allow this block to be added to the main chain as well”, the forum post reads.
The attack went on for about 3 hours until Verge’s lead developer, Justin successfully proffered solution to the problem temporally after a second attempt with an post. However, by that time, hundreds of blocks has been established by the hacker and it was irreversible.
In a bid to down play the attack, verge, on its twitter account posted:
Source:
In a bid to compound the altcoin’s problem, the supposed hacker in a said, “hey Verge Team, get some real developers and fix your code.
We have found another 2 exploits which can make quick hashes as well.”
Narrating an experience of the event, a Verge holder explained:
“I visited some hours ago the official Verge Twitter profile to read the news about the hash hack. While reading the tweet I noticed several messages offering a compensation for the attack by Verge”.
“Send x Eth and you get some bonus back. Sounded legit to me as it was affilated to the hash attack and I suffered from it as well having had some hours only orphaned blocks on all my baikals, hence I fall victim to this damn scam on the official twitter page”.
In another , a user lodged a complaint stating: “based on what I see from the dev postings here it’s apparent that if ocminer had never brought this to everyone’s attention, the XVG team would have never admitted to or disclosed what happened. Trying to downplay and being flippant about the severity here is just pissing on the XVG faithful.”
It can also be recalled that last month, Verges Twitter account was also taken over by hackers where users were asked for coin.
Musing over the all the occurrence of heist, the developer is preparing a hard fork for the altcoin.
The post appeared first on .




