August 22, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Even Joe Lubin Couldn't Stop 'Dr Doom' Roubini from Trashing Crypto

Even joe lubin couldn't stop 'dr doom' roubini from trashing crypto

Even Joe Lubin Couldn't Stop 'Dr Doom' Roubini from Trashing Crypto

Even joe lubin couldn't stop 'dr doom' roubini from trashing crypto

Nouriel Roubini was in full attack mode in his latest crypto debate.

“The entire crypto land is more unequal in terms of income and wealth than North Korea,” he said Wednesday afternoon, and the jabs didn’t stop there, with the former Clinton administration economist, better known as “Dr. Doom” for his prediction of the 2008 financial collapse, taking his criticism of all things crypto to new levels.

Still, this was perhaps to be expected. After antics onstage at the Milken Institute Global Conference earned him headlines, the organizers of the Fluidity Summit invited Roubini to go toe-to-toe with ConsenSys founder Joseph Lubin, with Roubini playing the bear to Lubin’s bull.

Long a cryptocurrency basher, Roubini didn’t make a different case this time, though his arguments were perhaps distinguished by their breadth and energy. (The moderator, former COMEX Chair Donna Redel, even went so far as to use a whistle on him at one point to rein in the conversation).

Alleging various miners, exchanges and cryptocurrencies have cultish followings, Roubini argued against the idea cryptocurrencies are decentralized, positing that these groups tend to have significant sway over the development direction a protocol takes.

Roubini told the audience:

“The whole point of the crypto world is to say we don’t believe in central banks … everything is going to be decentralized. I see totally the opposite in crypto land.”

As expected, Lubin came to the industry’s defense with point-by-point counter examples that articulated a broad thesis for how blockchain will enact change.

“We’re building systems that are fundamentally, atomically about collaboration,” Lubin said.

It was a capstone conversation to a day of cheerleading institutional investment in crypto. Perplexingly, some of Roubini’s toughest barbs seemed to thrill much of the crowd, though it’s hard to tell if this represented real sentiment or if crypto enthusiasts just love a good show.

Nevertheless, investor Jehan Chu of Kenetic Capital saw the crowd as very much on team crypto.

He told CoinDesk:

“This isn’t winning hearts and minds. Everyone is here to do business.”

Peace Offerings

And much of this is a credit to Lubin, who was more nuanced onstage, granting imperfections but attempting to couch them as technological waypoints rather than insoluble problems.

Lubin tried to even concede to Roubini on some of his smaller points. For example, he took on mining, saying, “I agree that the mining systems are susceptible to centralization.”

Promising that a proof-of-stake protocol for ethereum should be deployed soon, he said it will enable people to replace all that hardware infrastructure with “a bond, an economic bond on the blockchain.” He even argued that it will be more secure than bitcoin’s pioneering proof-of-work system.

In this way, some of the earlier panelists pointed to some of the very difficult challenges decentralization presents. Stefan George, the CTO and co-founder of Gnosis, a prediction market whose early 2017 initial coin offering (ICO) hinted at how big the year in crypto would be, expressed frustration at working with a slew of wallets with different configurations. “We all need to agree on one API,” he said.

And Alex Wearn of IDEX spoke more broadly to the competitiveness of decentralized applications. “It’s not going to happen unless usability pretty much matches the centralized experience.”

Roubini was less circumspect. He said that the dapps on the market are by and large pyramid schemes.

Each time Lubin described progress, Roubini dismissed it out of hand. For example, he argued that the crypto-iluminati have been saying for years that scaling problems could be fixed.

“I’ll show you the code,” Lubin offered. It was probably his biggest applause moment of the whole debate.

In another example, Roubini said “cryptocurrency” was a misnomer because it’s not really money. To be money, he argued, it has to be a unit of account, a means of exchange and reliable store of value.

Lubin countered by pointing out that MakerDAO has made a stable coin on ethereum that has, he said, something like $1 billion dollars in value in it. Even as ether tanked early this year, the MakerDAO token held steady at its peg with the dollar.

Roubini, however, was hardly impressed.

So who won?

Still, surprisingly, if the winner were measured by who got the most big laughs or big rounds of applause, it would go to Roubini.

In fact, Roubini’s biggest moment probably came when he first pointed out that there was no good reason for a business to limit customers with a token. He asserted that if every company only accepts tokens for its goods or services, there will be no way for people to know how to compare prices.

“You’re going into a world of ‘The Flintstones’ or barter,” Roubini said. “It’s totally inefficient. It’s never going to work”

That’s not to say Roubini was the only one in the room with doubts, though he may have been the only one committed to them. Even Lubin didn’t miss his chance to say something about forthcoming regulatory action, but he spun it the same way as everything else: a speed bump on the way.

“Although there will be some negative news around some of the projects that sold tokens, there will also so be some good news, and we will see a lot of that in 2018,” he said.

But again and again Roubini argued that ethereum itself should start policing scams and kicking them off the platform now, not addressing how that would run fundamentally counter to the censorship resistance ideology engineered into these platforms. But it did reflect the core idea that all of his arguments stemmed from.

He said:

“I do believe in centralization.”

So even if Lubin did win the debate, it seems clear he could never win over Roubini. Nor could Roubini ever win over him. That fundamental ambivalence, one widespread among smart people during what Lubin called “exponential times,” was well captured by another crypto diehard at the end of a prior panel.

“Some of this could be permanent that we’re putting on a blockchain,” Samantha Radocchia of the supply chain company Chronicled said. “I’d like to encourage thinking about that.”

Roubini v. Lubin photo by Brady Dale for CoinDesk.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Published at Fri, 11 May 2018 03:11:17 +0000

Features[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]

Previous Article

The Show About Nothing – YMB Podcast E241

Next Article

China Government Begins Blockchain Standards Creation, Eyes 2019 Deadline

You might be interested in …

Bitcoin atm

Bitcoin ATM

bitcoin ATMBy qian_xian on 2014-09-18 19:09:05[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]

Re: 西部农民工"返乡潮"调查:60后回归 90后不远行

Re: 西部农民工"返乡潮"调查:60后回归 90后不远行 21世纪经济报道 记者 李果 成都报道 2017年春运期间四川省交通运输部门将发送旅客1.4亿人次,同比下降7%,减少客流超千万人次。这是四川省春运史上首次出现客流量明显下降,其中原因之一,是外出务工人员减少所致。 2月20日的成都是一个阴天,大年已过,成都地区最大的劳动力市场——成都市锦江区人力资源市场内人潮涌动。 45岁的夏德平已经连续三天来到这里,他望着电子屏幕上不断更新的招工信息,心里打着算盘。 “要是再没有好的工作,就回顺德去。”夏德平对21世纪经济报道记者说。他几乎是西部“第一代”农民工的典型:17岁跟随自己家乡——四川省仁寿县的打工大军来到广东“找活路”,尝尽艰辛,最终学得修车手艺,如今已带出徒弟无数。 但随着年纪增长,夏德平回乡就业的想法日渐迫切,“落叶归根,何况家中老父还需赡养”。 与夏德平不同,22岁的陈萍根本没有想过要去东部沿海务工,“高中毕业又上了几年技校,在成都找一个工作并不难”。 “60后”与“90后”农民工均不再愿意出省务工,成为目前东部沿海地区技术工人缺乏的因素之一。据中国国家统计局数据,从2012年末到2015年末,外出农民工较上年增长比例逐年下降,增长率分别为3.0%、1.7%、1.3%及0.4%。 但与此同时,无论是就近务工或者返乡创业,西部农民工未来的就业情况并非坦途。 东部沿海不再是打工首选 夏德平有些骄傲的对21世纪经济报道记者摊开双手,常年做汽修,黑色的油迹不再能被洗净,成为另一种肤色,“别人问我汽车修得怎么样,我就把手伸过去给他们看。” 夏德平说话的时候总是夹杂着普通话,接近二十年在广东顺德的打工经历,多少对他有所改变,也影响了他对“好工作”的定义。 对于“好工作”,夏德平用了几个指标:“工资不少于8000元,包吃住,每周休息一天半”。 工资8000元,这已经低于他在顺德的工资,但三天来夏德平总是碰壁。其中原因之一,是随着大量农民工从沿海返回,人力资源的紧缺度缓解,用工单位有了更多的选择和议价空间。 来自四川省统计局的数据也显示,目前四川省“缺工”与“招工难”并存,企业用工结构性矛盾依然明显,求职者对薪酬期望过高、符合岗位要求的应聘者较少,分别占到总体影响因素的45.9%和29.5%。 尽管做好了再回顺德的准备,但夏德平仍希望可以在成都找到工作,这几天他不断在调低自己的要求,工资“再低一点也可以接受”。 至于选择回乡就业的原因,夏德平说,除身体状况外,年事已高的父亲需要赡养也是重要因素——这几乎是第一代农民工选择回乡就业的主要因素:首先是自己普遍到50岁左右年纪,身体状况不再能够承受高强度工作,养老是第一需求,不再追求高工资;第二是父母年事已高,不具备劳动力,需要就近就业,方便赡养老人。 事实上,整个西部地区的农民工正在加速回流。21世纪经济报道记者从贵州省就业工作联席会议制度办公室获得的数据显示,截止到2016年12月底,贵州省农村劳动力返乡创业就业90.65万人,比去年同期增加9.75万人,增长12.05%。 另外,一个数据也客观反映了这样的现象:来自四川省经信委数据显示,2017年春运期间四川省交通运输部门将发送旅客1.4亿人次,同比下降7%,减少客流超千万人次。这是四川省春运史上首次出现客流量明显下降,其中原因之一,是外出务工人员减少所致。 四川省社科院副院长郭晓鸣称,农民工回流将是未来一个趋势,就四川省而言,四川省基础设施建设投入、电子和新材料等产业的快速发展,吸引在外农民工回流,“除非整体经济情况出现重大变化,否则这些现象会在未来相当一段时间内继续,也可能成为一种趋势。” 大量的90后农民工也选择不再外出务工,陈萍刚刚从成都的一家制鞋工厂辞职,来成都市锦江区人力资源市场,是希望找到一份“更体面”的工作,她的兄弟姐妹中,除表哥在广东打工外,其余均选择就近工作。 21世纪经济报道记者通过采访后总结了如下因素:第一是随着经济发展,西部的就业机会随之增加,同时工资收入差别缩小;第二是和父辈相比,90后的农民工受教育程度更高,有能力适应具备技术含量的工种;第三,父辈为其积累了一定财富资源,大多数90后农民工不再背负沉重的家庭负担;第四,部分90后农民工,经历过长期和父母分别的“留守”时期,不希望该现象再发生在其子女身上,因此也选择就近就业。 陈萍也注意到身边另一个现象:同龄“农民工”不再去沿海打工的另一个原因,是为生二胎做准备。 她对21世纪经济报道记者称:第一是和大城市居民相比,乡村或三四线城市的房价与生活水平对其产生的压力相对较小,使其有能力生育二胎;第二,目前农村地区对于教育质量的重视程度相对偏低,“农村教育质量低,但学费也低,能够负担两个小孩的学费”。 自主创业面临“融资难题” 大量农民工回原籍就业,也对当地的新增就业岗位的扩张能力提出考验。如2017年春节后,四川省金堂县已经在各乡镇和工业区开了13场巡回招聘会,据各用工单位提供的数据,今年361个企业预计有近万个就业岗位,目前与企业签订了意向就业的有2960人。 在开展形式多样的招聘会的同时,自主创业成为西部地方政府近年热推的举措。来自四川省人力资源和社会保障厅的数据显示,2016年,该省免费发放《农民工返乡创业政策宣传手册》13万册,制作返乡创业政策解读动漫宣传片,举办多期返乡创业政策培训班,组织力量赴省内外川籍农民工集中的园区、企业开展返乡创业专项宣传活动,为支持农民工返乡创业营造了良好的社会氛围。 据粗略统计,2016年全省全年新增返乡创业农民工7.1万人,创办企业1.8万个,实现产值140.5亿元,2月16日,四川还召开了表彰大会,对返乡创业先进个人进行嘉奖。 但尽管近两年西部从省到县市,均出台了一系列支持农民工回乡创业的政策,但数量仍偏少。如贵州2016年返乡的90.65万农民工中,选择创业的人数仅7.11万人。 […]