February 24, 2026

Capitalizations Index – B ∞/21M

Equity Markets vs. Cryptocurrency Markets: Weekly Performance Review, Feb. 17-23

Equity markets vs. Cryptocurrency markets: weekly performance review, feb. 17-23

Equity Markets vs. Cryptocurrency Markets: Weekly Performance Review, Feb. 17-23

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

The market data is provided by the HitBTCexchange.

Chinese stocks led the way last week for global developed equity markets with the Shanghai Composite Index rising 89.86 or 2.81% to close at 3,289.02. Keep in mind though that Chinese markets were closed till Thursday and this performance reflects only two days of trading due to the Chinese New Year holiday. Regulators announced on Friday, Feb.23, that they would take over Anbang Insurance and the index was still able to advance against the news, a sign of strength.

The remaining six markets tracked in the table below mostly had positive but unexciting performance, while UK’s FTSE 100 index was the one negative market.

Overall, equity markets continue their counter-trend rallies following generally sharp drops off highs earlier in the month.

In Japan the Nikkei 225 index was the second strongest performing market last week, rising 172.53 or 0.79% to end at 3,289.02. On Friday signs of inflation were reported with the CPI inching up 0.9% in January from a year earlier. The third best performer was the US with the S&P5 500 index gaining 15.08 or 0.55% to wrap up the week at 21,892.78. Downward pressure was seen for most of last week with the S&P 500 trading largely sideways before strength came back by Friday. The index closed strong, at the high for the week and a three-week closing high.

Hang Seng Index: Three-week closing high

The Hang Seng Index ended at a three-week closing high, which is a sign of strength, up 151.80 or 0.49% for the week at 31,267.20. Since the 2016 swing low of 21,488.80 the index has been progressing higher in a relatively well-formed parallel trend channel.

Two weeks ago the bottom trend line of that channel was tested as support, along with the 100-day moving average and 78.6% Fibonacci retracement, and it held, subsequently ending a two-week 13.01% correction. As of last week’s 31,477.90 high the index had bounced 8.06% from that low and retraced at least 50% of the prior decline.

Tvc

For the past five days, the Hang Seng has been consolidating within a range. Therefore, a move through the bottom of last week’s low at 30,720.50 likely leads to further weakness and a possible test of the recent bottom from three weeks ago. A move through the top points to a continuation of the bounce into the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement at 31,820.50, which would complete a gap fill from the decline at 31,712. This is followed by a price zone from around 32,394.9 to 32,552.10, consisting of the three-week high and 78.6% Fibonacci retracement, respectively.

BSE 30 Sensex Index: finally bottoming?

The BSE 30 Sensex Index has been technically lagging the other equity indices as it has barely budged off its recent 34,008.42 swing low. That low was reached three weeks ago along with support of the lower parallel channel line, the 100-day moving average, and the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement. It ended an 8.13% decline off the record high of 36,443.98 from two weeks prior. Last week the Sensex was up 131.39 or 0.39% to end at 34,142.15.

Nvy0

Nevertheless, the bottom developing in this index may be more reliable than what is being exhibited in the other indices as a potential double bottom trend reversal pattern has formed. The three-week low was tested as support with last week’s 33,554.37 low and the index bounced from there to close near the high for the week. This is short-term bullish behavior, and it is occurring at a strong support zone given the confluence of indicators noted in the paragraph above. A breakout of the double bottom occurs on the move above 34,535.

Cryptocurrencies: All weaken together

Leading cryptocurrencies were weak across the board last week and clearly underperformed equity markets. Regardless, the moves were mild historically. It is interesting to note that some of the top cryptocurrencies remain correlated as to direction. In other words, since moving into corrective mode from record highs, they have been generally moving up and down, of course to different degrees, somewhat together.

We will continue to watch the evolving relationships in the coming weeks for signs of a leading index and divergence. Further short-term weakness would not be surprising in the coming week or two as cryptocurrencies continue to sort out a sustainable bottom. So far the recoveries have been V-shaped and are not as reliable as consolidation bottoms of some sort.

IOTA was the worst performer last week, falling $0.39 or 18.4% to close at $1.71. Two weeks ago the IOT/USD pair broke out of a bullish descending wedge pattern, and last week it pulled back towards the top downtrend line of the pattern to test it as support. That process has not yet completed as a short-term downtrend (7-days) remains. Therefore, the expectation is for the cryptocurrency to turn back up once the pullback is complete.

Ethereum exhibited similar price behavior last week as it pulled back to its 100-day moving average support, $791.04, at last week’s low of $787.0. That followed a breakout of an internal downtrend line two weeks ago. Last week the ETH/USD pair was down $84.82 or 9.0% to end at $852.56.

bitcoin: Watch for continued retracement lower to Fibonacci support levels

Bitcoin was the stronger performer last week, down only $29.90 or 0.30% to end at $10,166.10. Since hitting a bottom at $5,920 three weeks ago, the BTC/USD pair has rallied as much as 98.96% as of last week’s $11,780 high, 50% retracement. That rally included a breakout of an internal downtrend line.

Btc

Since hitting last week’s high bitcoin has been pulling back. Next watch for support to be found that can turn the cryptocurrency back up for a second leg up off the $5,920 bottom and possibly get above last week’s high. The 61.8% Fibonacci retracement is at $8,158.96, and the 78.6% retracement is at $7,174.61. Watch for support to be seen at either of these price areas.

bitcoin Cash: Looks to be heading lower

Bitcoin Cash continues to show relative weakness on a technical basis. Year-to-date it is the third weakest performer with a drop of 47.8%, and last week it fell $277.30 or 18.1% to end at 1,255.60. It broke out of its internal trend line two weeks ago and rallied into resistance at $1,636.80 before slipping into a retracement, which is where it remains. At that high, the BCH/USD pair was 118.24% above the bottom of the recent correction at $750.0. From the December peak of $4,000.1, the price had fallen 81.25% at that low.

Bch

Next watch for a continuation of the decline into potential support at the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement of $1,088.80, followed by the 78.6% retracement at $939.80. Once the pullback is complete, the cryptocurrency can be expected to further recover along with the rest of the cryptocurrency sector.

The market data is provided by the HitBTCexchange; the charts for the analysis are provided by TradingView.

Published at Mon, 26 Feb 2018 01:29:17 +0000

bitcoin[wpr5_ebay kw=”bitcoin” num=”1″ ebcat=”” cid=”5338043562″ lang=”en-US” country=”0″ sort=”bestmatch”]

Previous Article

CryptoFacto – Shitcoin Lite – $TX Transfer Coin

Next Article

Bowhead Health

You might be interested in …

忙しい人のためのliberal radicalism – unchained –

忙しい人のためのLiberal Radicalism – Unchained –

忙しい人のためのLiberal Radicalism – Unchained – 0. 概要 ペーパーの目的を一言で表すと、「公共財である分散型、自己組織化エコシステムの(ほぼ)最適な提供を可能にするための、慈善的または公的資金による播種を提供すること」です。これを聞くとDAO(自律分散型組織)を思い浮かべますが、その違いは公共物の最適提供を可能にする慈善的な方法をカバーしているかそうでないかだと言えます。 このアイデアはGlen WeylがRadical Marketで提唱したQuadratic Voting(以後QV)を公共物の資金調達メカニズムとして拡張しています。QVは従来の一人1票や定量購買法とは異なり、投票者が購入する票の数の2乗ずつ値段が上がります(例:1票が100円、2票が400円、3票が900円 )。QVにより、多数決ではなく、最も関心の持たれていることに投票されるため、最適な公共物の提供が導かれるという考えです。 Liberal Radicalism(以後LR)は従来のマーケットのリニアーなファンディング原理とは異なり、貢献者による貢献の平方根ルートの合計の2乗です。 後半には金融、ニュースメディア、オープンソースプロジェクト、都心公共プロジェクトなどへの応用例や、中立的で非権威主義的な規則を提供することによって、政治哲学における古典的なリベラルコミュニティー主義の解説についての議論を行います。 1. 序章 著者がQVを使って解決しようとしている問題は大きく分けて以下の3つです: フリーライダー問題による不公平性、資金不足の問題。 一人1票ではプロジェクトの重要性に基づいた選択がされない問題。 マッチドネーションの非効率性。 フリーライダーとは公共物を貢献などのコストなしに利用する人や組織を指し、経済学上での公共物とはnon-excludableかつ、non-rivolourious である — つまり個人の利用を妨げたり、誰か一人が利用することにより他の者の利用を妨げることはできない特徴を持つサービスやモノを指す。i.e. 国防や公園。 マッチドネーションは企業が従業員の寄付をあらかじめ決められた上限までスポンサーするシステムです。例えば従業員Aが寄付$100すると企業から$100のスポンサーを受けるため、合計$200の寄付をしたことになるということです。従業員Bが$1000寄付した場合は合計の$1100が寄付されます。ここでの問題は、従業員による寄付金とスポンサー額の割合が従業員Bだと小さいため、大きな寄付をするインセンティブを適切に与えられていません。よって任意の限度額や割合を決めるシステムの採用が必要です。 まとめると、このペーパーでは、(1)と(2)の問題と、(3)の問題を解決する価値が最大化される最適な任意の限度額を決めるデザインについて議論します。 LRを採用することにより、貢献度の最も高い人の優位性を最小限に抑え、貢献度の最も低い人には貢献のインセンティブを与えることができます。よって最も重要と考えられる公共物がより多くの資金を供給され、かつ一人1票の問題である多数派意見の優位性、少数派意見の抑圧を解決します。 2. 背景 このチャプターはフリーライダー問題に関する言及から始まります。個人が自己中心的な利益のみを追求した場合、他のエコシステム参加者を除くその個人のみが受益者となるため、資金調達総額は受益者の数に比例して増加しません。 国防やインフラは国の徴税によって運営されているじゃないかと考えられますが、ここで焦点を当てられているのは、公共物として浅い歴史をもち、限られた資金のみしか提供されていない公共物です。 第一に、公共物は固定のものではありません。オープンソースソフトウェアやビッグデータに始まり、ジャーナリズムや公共物として認められた方が価値が増加する産業も公共物となるかもしれません。 さらに、小さなコミュニティにのみ価値が認められているもの(資金調達の自伝であまり知られていない、誤解されているなどの理由より)は、大多数のコミュニティからの資金を得ることができません。つまり少数派のコミュニティは民主主義から資金を受け取りにくいです。これが少数派コミュニティが一人1票よりもチャリティや資本主義により資金を受けることが多い理由となります。 以下は従来の資金調達方法による問題点です: […]